B
Balto1
Guest
A lot of people do confuse depiction for endorsement.
It idoes not contain material that meet the description of 18 U.S.C. §2252. That’s not to say that it isn’t disturbing though.Balto1:![]()
And this is not? Having sexualized pictures of minors has landed people in jail.and it’s illegal to produce child pornography.
I am wondering the same thing with all these threads. I have never heard of this before here. I decided to watch the trailer. Fortunately, it seems like such a chick flick and teen flick, I could care less. Maybe it is supposed to be like aversion therapy where all the mush is enough to make most men lose their lunch.Are you advertising this movie?
In a different CAG subforum there was a related discussion. It was centered on the CardiB and Megan Thee Stallion video WAP expressing concerns that young girls may see the video and it shape their behaviour and perception on what is okay. From the NPR interview with the creator, it sounds like the movie was motivated by similar concerns. Only instead of a music video being the source of the concerning images, it is social media.What are people’s gut reactions? I get their explanation back, that they claim they are exposing this exploitation of children.