P
Penitent60
Guest
there were 6 masses instead of the usual 3 with 2 priests. therefore, the congregation is approx. 600.
That is along the lines of what I was wondering.there were 6 masses instead of the usual 3 with 2 priests. therefore, the congregation is approx. 600.
Very likely. We were talking in a meeting last night that we will likely only see a window between mid-June to mid-September where we can provide masses under the “new normal”. We strongly suspect that the governor will shutdown churches during the flu season from October through February.I expect to see the obligation suspended for a long time.
Yes, that’s at the midpoint of a normal week. The priests are really trying to see what they can do to accommodate everyone they can so we first looked at what that would look like; basically undoable. The pastor really doesn’t want to have to go to something like assigning families to one Sunday a month if we can avoid it.That presumes 100% normal attendance at 1/3 seating capacity, though, right? Do you think you’ll get those kinds of numbers?
That’s my point, though. It’s not going to be a normal week, when we come back.Yes, that’s at the midpoint of a normal week.
Right. That’s the tough question. And it seems to have no real answers yet, other than “we’ll wait and see.”We are also looking at alternative numbers and trying to asses what percentage of various groups might actually come. Like many parishes we have the dichotomy where a high percentage of the most likely to want to come every week are also the most vulnerable (elderly couples or windowed people). The question is if we have 300 people that are 65+ that come every week, how many of them would come versus staying home.
Oh, I agree. We just used it as a starting point to say what would be required. We also expect that the rules might be in place through 2022 so trying to see what might be possible after the rabid fear starts to drop off.That’s my point, though. It’s not going to be a normal week, when we come back.
I think it’s going to be quite a shock. We still haven’t tallied the losses for the Trump election and the latest round of child abuse scandals, and now this. A large number of the parishes in the US were running on fumes as it was. A lot of the gray heads are going to opt for “early retirement”. A lot of the young people who were working their way towards the exits will stay away, too. That puts a heavy burden on those of us who will stay.The real scary question will be how many never return .
I suspect that has a lot to do with the area one lives in. My diocese is much more red than it is blue, so Trump’s win likely did nothing but increase our numbers. We’ve certainly had some parishioners leave because they felt our clergy were to stringent, but the parish still has had good growth over the last 15 years.We still haven’t tallied the losses for the Trump election and the latest round of child abuse scandals, and now this. A large number of the parishes in the US were running on fumes as it was.
…
We just had half of the parishes in our diocese closed ten years ago. I’m afraid more closures will be in store once the dust settles.
And I’m just so glad that there will be public masses again!"Safeguarding the health and welfare of others,
not just oneself, is the moral duty of Christians."
With adequate training and supplies, why not?Parish has to pay people to work approx 12 hours on Sunday doing cleaning (I cannot fathom folks volunteering to be janitors during this pandemic).