Reverence vs Rights

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lux_et_Tenebrae
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why do you assume someone who wants to kneel is feeling the need to make a statement? Are you trying to judge their motives?
Of course they are trying to make a statement! They are saying: Look, Lord, here I am kneeling before your great presence and begging your forgiveness, and that you may nourish me in your love. I look to you as a child to a parent, a creature to a creator, a slave to a master. I am not worthy that you should come under my roof, and yet here you are, greeting me and giving me your very life.
 
Why do you assume someone who wants to kneel is feeling the need to make a statement? Are you trying to judge their motives?
Because, there is a hundred-and-one ways to be reverent, without making a statment in front of, and disrupting dozens or hundreds of others.

It’s called “humility”. Humility isn’t reserved only towards God, it applies to everyone and everything.
 
Because, there is a hundred-and-one ways to be reverent, without making a statment in front of, and disrupting dozens or hundreds of others.

It’s called “humility”. Humility isn’t reserved only towards God, it applies to everyone and everything.
Once again, you’re presuming to judge based on a specific action. A person kneeling to receive communion may be making a statement, but we have no way of knowing that’s his or her intention. Only God knows that.
 
Once again, you’re presuming to judge based on a specific action. A person kneeling to receive communion may be making a statement, but we have no way of knowing that’s his or her intention. Only God knows that.
The same logic applies to those who defend said action. You don’t know that they AREN’T making a statement as to “how much more holy they are than those around them who participate in the horrible indult/US norm of receiving in the hand while standing…” :rolleyes:

The most holy and reverent people I have known in my lifetime are contrite and humble. They do not make statements. They do not bring attention to themselves. They pray rather than criticize.

They follow Christ’s admonition to do their good works and deeds quietly and privately so as not to bring attention to themselves…lest they lose their reward in Heaven because they’ve already received it here on earth.
 
A proper catechesis on the subject would explain clearly why the bishops prefer standing to kneeling, and why kneeling is still to be allowed to individuals, just as reception on the tongue is allowed.

BTW, I receive standing but prefer kneeling. My kids (!) sometimes spontaneously kneel, especially when the liturgy is more reverent, such as at the Cathedral here in St. Louis.

It is a sin against charity to read negative motives into people’s actions when there is no other evidence.
 
Because they’re focused on receiving the Eucharist instead of what some non-conformist in front of them is doing?

When everybody is together, things work just fine. It’s when somebody feels the need to make a statement, that things go awry.
If we are all focused on the Eucharist then we should all look out for our neighbor and presume the best possible motives. Kneeling in a Catholic Church, especially to receive communion, is not a foreign happening in the Latin rite.

Finding fault with some person who kneels is the problem. Why do we want so much to fault them?
 
Because, there is a hundred-and-one ways to be reverent, without making a statment in front of, and disrupting dozens or hundreds of others.

It’s called “humility”. Humility isn’t reserved only towards God, it applies to everyone and everything.
Why do you assign a “statement” to these people? Not only is it an authentic right it is a long tradition, well established.
 
The same logic applies to those who defend said action. You don’t know that they AREN’T making a statement as to “how much more holy they are than those around them who participate in the horrible indult/US norm of receiving in the hand while standing…” :rolleyes:

The most holy and reverent people I have known in my lifetime are contrite and humble. They do not make statements. They do not bring attention to themselves. They pray rather than criticize.

They follow Christ’s admonition to do their good works and deeds quietly and privately so as not to bring attention to themselves…lest they lose their reward in Heaven because they’ve already received it here on earth.
The burden of proof is on those making accusations, not those defending the practice.

And good for those you know who pray rather than criticize. Maybe there should be less criticism of those who kneel at communion and more praying, right? 😉
 
The same logic applies to those who defend said action. You don’t know that they AREN’T making a statement as to “how much more holy they are than those around them who participate in the horrible indult/US norm of receiving in the hand while standing…” :rolleyes:

The most holy and reverent people I have known in my lifetime are contrite and humble. They do not make statements. They do not bring attention to themselves. They pray rather than criticize.

They follow Christ’s admonition to do their good works and deeds quietly and privately so as not to bring attention to themselves…lest they lose their reward in Heaven because they’ve already received it here on earth.
How can you say all this? We are told to presume the best of others. When I see kneeling I am edified. I think how much better I should be.
 
You know, I think it is good to hear the assumptions that other people have about me kneeling to receive. It is good to realize how proud this worm must be to even be at Mass, let alone to receive my Creator and Savior! And yet, and yet He Himself calls me there. I am nothing, I dare not try to hide that and receive as if I were worthy.

How anyone else receives is their own business. It is between them and God, not me. I have no doubt that they are more worthy than I am to receive.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ethelzguy View Post
The same logic applies to those who defend said action. You don’t know that they AREN’T making a statement as to “how much more holy they are than those around them who participate in the horrible indult/US norm of receiving in the hand while standing…”

The most holy and reverent people I have known in my lifetime are contrite and humble. They do not make statements. They do not bring attention to themselves. They pray rather than criticize.

They follow Christ’s admonition to do their good works and deeds quietly and privately so as not to bring attention to themselves…lest they lose their reward in Heaven because they’ve already received it here on earth.

How can you say all this? We are told to presume the best of others. When I see kneeling I am edified. I think how much better I should be.
Quote=ethelzguy
Quote:
Originally Posted by ethelzguy View Post
Because they’re focused on receiving the Eucharist instead of what some non-conformist in front of them is doing?

When everybody is together, things work just fine. It’s when somebody feels the need to make a statement, that things go awry.​

Seems ethelzguy is in a habit of opening his mouth without thinking. How does what he say reflect back to our Pope and the Church. Is our Pope a “nonconformist making a statement” — “bringing attention to himself and loosing his reward in heaven” – by his actions of having those who receive from him kneel and receive on the tongue.
 
Seems ethelzguy is in a habit of opening his mouth without thinking. How does what he say reflect back to our Pope and the Church. Is our Pope a “nonconformist making a statement” — “bringing attention to himself and loosing his reward in heaven” – by his actions of having those who receive from him kneel and receive on the tongue.
I am not going to blame Ethylz or anyone else, but in general I think it is a gotcha game. People see others define themselves as traditional and then use the GIRM to yell gotcha you are being a cafeteria Catholic and so on.

The problem is kneeling is not prohibited and the Vatican has said so. What else can they use now?
 
I am not going to blame Ethylz or anyone else, but in general I think it is a gotcha game. People see others define themselves as traditional and then use the GIRM to yell gotcha you are being a cafeteria Catholic and so on.

The problem is kneeling is not prohibited and the Vatican has said so. What else can they use now?

My guess – if they can’t makeup something new --they will continue to use the same canards they are using now.
 
I have seen this line of argument before and I find it peculiar. Why are Catholics “stumbling” over other Catholics that kneel? Is kneeling now foreign to so many?
No, it’s just unexpected. Have you ever had a child come to a dead halt in front of you when you’re moving forward in the communion line? I have, and were it not for being able to grab onto a pew I would have fallen on top of said child.

If people walked up to a communion rail and knelt it would be simple. But when there’s no communion rail – and when we’ve been told by our bishops, as approved by Rome, that our common posture at that time is to stand – it’s a problem.
Why do you assign a “statement” to these people? Not only is it an authentic right it is a long tradition, well established.
I keep wondering why people bring up “rights” in terms of the Mass. Demanding one’s rights seems a strange way of worshipping one who is meek and humble of heart. Humility is such a difficult virtue to attain. I think it’s easier to choose when to be humble. “I’ll show my humility by kneeling to receive communion” may be easier for some people than “I’ll show my humility by following the instructions of those who have authority over me.”
 
No, it’s just unexpected. Have you ever had a child come to a dead halt in front of you when you’re moving forward in the communion line? I have, and were it not for being able to grab onto a pew I would have fallen on top of said child.

If people walked up to a communion rail and knelt it would be simple. But when there’s no communion rail – and when we’ve been told by our bishops, as approved by Rome, that our common posture at that time is to stand – it’s a problem.

I keep wondering why people bring up “rights” in terms of the Mass. Demanding one’s rights seems a strange way of worshipping one who is meek and humble of heart. Humility is such a difficult virtue to attain. I think it’s easier to choose when to be humble. “I’ll show my humility by kneeling to receive communion” may be easier for some people than “I’ll show my humility by following the instructions of those who have authority over me.”

It isn’t–once we acknowledge that Rome as the highest authority has clarified and spoken on our communion posture—this being that people have the full freedom to kneel, are **not **to be imposed upon --called disobedient, and/or charged with illicitness.

What is really disturbing is for someone to continue charge another with lack of humility/humbleness --for kneeling—which our own Pope then Card. called a “particularly expressive sign of adoration, completely appropriate in light of the true, real and substantial presence of Our Lord Jesus Christ under the consecrated species”.

By the way --seems you have shot your own foot. If you’ve almost tripped over a standing child --then the excuse of people “tripping” over a kneeling person goes out the window.
 
I keep wondering why people bring up “rights” in terms of the Mass. Demanding one’s rights seems a strange way of worshipping one who is meek and humble of heart. Humility is such a difficult virtue to attain. I think it’s easier to choose when to be humble. “I’ll show my humility by kneeling to receive communion” may be easier for some people than “I’ll show my humility by following the instructions of those who have authority over me.”
I don’t think the faithful have a right to kneel when receiving Holy Communion. They do have a right to receive on the tongue. In any case, when the Holy See has recognized that the faithful have a right, then in obedience the rest of us are required to respect that pronouncement. There is no lack of humility in “presuming” to do what the highest authorities in the Church have taught you that you are allowed to do. The lack of humility is when someone who is one knotch up from you decides that they know better than your bishop, or Rome.
How anyone else receives is their own business. It is between them and God, not me. I have no doubt that they are more worthy than I am to receive.
Well, yes, it is not our business, but it certainly is the business of the bishop. As the catechism instructs, “liturgical services are not private functions, but are celebrations of the church.” The faithful do not have a right to each throw in their own little piece of pious chaos, in order to make the liturgy suit themselves. Still, when it is a minor thing, it is good to overlook it, as you suggest. I would hope others overlook my failures, well-meaning or not, in the same way.

You are right that this is not the business of most of us. I can’t see how it is more humble to chide people, even when they are showing off, than to quietly pass over their behavior, when the duty of enforcing sacramental integrity wasn’t given to you. (Clergy and teachers or catechists with their charges are obviously a separate case.) Surely only the more serious abuses must be addressed immediately by the faithful. Humility starts at home, as it were, isn’t that right? IMHO, this is what Paul meant when he said he was willing to be all things to all people, so as not to give scandal to any.
 
By the way --seems you have shot your own foot. If you’ve almost tripped over a standing child --then the excuse of people “tripping” over a kneeling person goes out the window.
No…I said I almost fell on a child who stopped suddenly. Just like an adult who does the same thing and ends up at the same height. You think you’re stepping forward when there’s a sudden obstacle.
 
I’m not sure if anyone has posted this yet, but I think it is something important to keep in mind.

Many of the “liberals” look at this issue as an area where the “traditionals” are being hypocritical. They see the “traditionalists” being so adamant about their right to kneel to receive Communion, yet at the same time they’ll rail against the “liberals” for receiving in the hand, or for having altar girls or EMHC’s, or for celebrating Mass in the vernacular, or other such things that the Church allows.

Now, is this an unfair caricature? Absolutely. I am sure that not everyone who prefers to kneel feels that way about the other issues. But this is how it often comes across to those on the other side of the fence.

Is this a good enough reason not to kneel? Maybe, maybe not. I’ll let you decide. 😉
 
No…I said I almost fell on a child who stopped suddenly. Just like an adult who does the same thing and ends up at the same height. You think you’re stepping forward when there’s a sudden obstacle.

So then — by what you say —a case can be made against having children and adults (under a certain height) walking in the communion line. After all --they can “stop suddenly” causing the one behind to trip over them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top