M
Matt241
Guest
I’d like to read people’s opinions on this world-wide survey of the Traditional Rite. Is this cause for concern?
It’s always going to be something of a specialty item, but there are a lot of Catholics who have never had and cannot reasonably get the chance to experience it to see if they like it, because it’s simply not available most places. Diocesan priests are for the most part not trained to say it and don’t have much interest in saying it on top of all their other responsibilities.the EF has achieved or is very close to stasis; meaning that it is not given to any serious growth.
One also has to publicize the Masses to people who might attend. I know that until the Archdiocese here established a Latin Mass parish, it was a chore just trying to find where a Latin Mass might be on a given Sunday. There was a website but it was not kept up very well. I presume there were also e-mail lists and forums somewhere for the very committed, but for someone like me who is not going to be going to TLM every weekend but does want to go a few times a year, and is deluged constantly with other e-mails, the information was hard to find unless I stumbled on it via a flyer or a random Internet post.Around here the Latin Mass parishes seem to be growing and are very popular. I wouldn’t describe that as stasis.
+Lefebvre was a Holy Ghost Father and missionary in Africa. He eventually became Apostolic Delegate in Africa under Pius XII.If the TLM is not as attractive to African or Asian Catholics, it could well be that it resonates more with speakers of Romance or Germanic languages, or that it speaks to a uniquely European cultural identity.
Well, I hope not. Pope Francis has actually been pretty good to us where the TLM is concerned. His approach reminds me a lot of Bishop Walter Sullivan of Richmond (Virginia), who was wide-open to every theological stripe imaginable — including the traditionalists in his diocese. He was very generous in making the TLM available in Richmond, more generous than he had to be, per regulations at that time. Any bishop who would serve hot dogs and soda to the homeless in celebration of his having been consecrated couldn’t be all bad. Requiescat in pace.I see no cause for concern. It’s reasonable for the Pope at his point to want to collect some information on how EF Masses are coming along 10+ years after Summorum Pontificorum. Who knows, he may decide to promote them more widely based on the survey results. He’s certainly aware they are very popular with a significant group of committed Catholics.
A single priest “responds to a true pastoral need” every time he offers the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass — whether there are other people there or not. The world needs the graces of the Mass more than it needs anything else in all of creation.My only concern is the question of whether celebrations of the old rite “respond to a true pastoral need or is it promoted by a single priest”
That strikes me as a false dichotomy. A single priest can most certainly respond to a a true pastoral pastoral need. Why would Rome think it might be otherwise? Alternatively, a single priest can be a true instrument of God gathering the faithful to him and to Him, cf Francis of Assisi (Ok he was only a brother), Ignatius of Loyola, Dominic, Augustine, Kolbe, etc., etc. Why be concerned about a single priest doing God’s work? That question, on its face, is disturbing.
In my diocese, there is one priest who is responsible for ministering to the TLM community (another priest also says the EF mass but only for his parish) and he says mass for groups in about three or four different parts of the diocese. In that sense, it is promoted (effectively) by a single priest. However, I believe what the question is getting at is personality cults that can develop around particular priests. In other words, situations where there’s no significant devotion to the TLM except for one priest and his bad of followers.My only concern is the question of whether celebrations of the old rite “respond to a true pastoral need or is it promoted by a single priest”
Heck that can happen around any priest. I’ve seen it time and time again in the Church and I’ve only been confirmed since 2013!However, I believe what the question is getting at is personality cults that can develop around particular priests.
Africa is the hot spot for vocations these days. We have many young African francophone priests filling the void in Québec. As far as I can tell, almost all from an Ordinary Form background. I don’t think Asia is doing so bad either.Rome might well wish to consider also the many vocations that are coming from Latin Mass adherents.
Much of that issue could be part of the inquiry from the Vatican. I see lots of anecdotal information with no facts (like a head count). It appears that Rome may want that information; and we can all sit back and see what comes of that, if anything.I reckon that the percentage could at least make it up into the double digits if they were.
Just found this in Wikipedia:HomeschoolDad:
Africa is the hot spot for vocations these days. We have many young African francophone priests filling the void in Québec. As far as I can tell, almost all from an Ordinary Form background. I don’t think Asia is doing so bad either.Rome might well wish to consider also the many vocations that are coming from Latin Mass adherents.
@camoderator, can these threads be merged?Apologies if a topic on this has already been made; I couldn’t find any. Needless to say, I’m interested to see the results of the survey.
The survey pertains to the Missale Romanum of 1962, but will not include use of earlier versions before 1962, without approval. The survey is an extraordinary form Mass survey.… I’d like to read people’s opinions on this world-wide survey of the Traditional Rite. Is this cause for concern?
The last version of the Missale Romanum prior to the Council, which was published with the authority of Pope John XXIII in 1962 and used during the Council, will now be able to be used as a Forma extraordinaria of the liturgical celebration. It is not appropriate to speak of these two versions of the Roman Missal as if they were “two Rites”. Rather, it is a matter of a twofold use of one and the same rite.
As for the use of the 1962 Missal as a Forma extraordinaria of the liturgy of the Mass, I would like to draw attention to the fact that this Missal was never juridically abrogated and, consequently, in principle, was always permitted