H
He_Man
Guest
It’s very obvious, and predictable.I can’t help but notice that the posters here who are most critical of the new changes are Obama supporters.
Obama, a man with very little track record, says “Hope and Change,” and people lap it up.
The Church, with a staunch 2000 year history, makes a change more befitting the actual translation, and it is met with skepticism and doubt.
Weird.
Regardless, the change was made because every word of the Masss matters, and those words were not as accurate as they should be. Whether or not it “sounded better” or “more people liked it” were both irrelevant. People’s enjoyment or lack thereof of the new translation are merely anciallry to the real, more fundamental reasons for the change.
