R
rien
Guest
The person leading the RCIA at the parish closest to m - this is in the US - teaches that beleif in the real Presnce is optional and emphasizes the social Gospel. She is bringing in a good number of converts but this once orthodox parish is now anything but. About half the orthodox beleivers have converted to Eastern Orthodoxy or dropped out altogether. As in giving up. No support from the bishop here or frankly from Rome either.One can actually learn more about Catholicism - in some cases - outside the Catholic Church than within it. For example, you may take RCIA from someone who believes in liberation theology, under the guidance of a priest who deemphasizes spirituality for resistance to corporate greed, in a parish sympathetic to homosexual rights. You may never learn of the resurrection, which is preached over at First Baptist. Core Catholic doctrine may be denied or ignored, as documented on posts on CAF, in favor of theological novelty by those who disregard both the authority of Scripture and of the Church. Meanwhile, down the street, First Baptist may vociferously preach, teach and model a Biblical lifestyle wholly in accord with Catholicism, while departing on some issues. The priest in this case might reject almost all of Catholicism, while the Baptist pastor in this situation might, oddly, be far more Catholic in his theology and teaching than the priest. The question is who is closer to truth when you look past the label.
Problem is, many priests and bishops really don’t beleive - if they did and felt they’d lose their souls for leading sheep astray they would not have allowed the catechital disaster of the past several decades. I am talking US here but the situation in Brazil is probably generally analogous.