V
Valtiel
Guest
is the pivatal passage for the faith alone doctrine, how do I handle this???
Even Evangelicals recognize that the formula “believe in and confess Jesus” is an abbreviated summary of what is required for salvation, not a thorough and precise soteriological prescription. For example, Romans 10:9 does not mention repentance from sin, but few Evangelicals deny that it is not possible to be saved without repentance. Likewise, most Evangelicals agree saving faith involves more than the two beliefs that Paul mentions—the lordship of Christ and his Resurrection. If someone accepts these two doctrines but also believes that we can get to heaven by good works apart from grace, Evangelicals would say (quite rightly) that this person believes a false gospel, though he “fulfills” Romans 10:9.
Evangelicals require a number of other beliefs for Christian faith—the Trinity, the deity and personality of the Holy Spirit, creation, the Fall, man’s inability to save himself, the Virgin Birth, Christ’s sacrifice on the cross, the Second Coming, the inspiration and inerrancy of Scripture. If someone denied all of these doctrines, few Evangelicals would regard that person as a saved Christian, no matter how fervently he professed his belief that Jesus Christ is Lord and that God raised him from the dead. (There are further problems, too. If Romans 10:9 were a theologically precise formula of salvation, all mute people would be damned to hell, since Paul says not once but twice that one must confess Christ with one’s lips to be saved!)
Romans 10:9 is just one of a number of abbreviated accounts of salvation that do not mention everything necessary. The message preached by both Jesus and John the Baptist was “Repent and believe,” but in Acts 2:38 Peter said, “Repent and be baptized,” without even mentioning belief. Later in Acts, Paul tells the Philippian jailer, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved” (Acts 2:31), without mentioning repentance or baptism. All of these descriptions of salvation are partial. They do not intend to set forth everything necessary.
Ironically, the same Evanglicals who insist on a closed-box interpretation of Romans 10:9 run to the opposite extreme when confronted with passages that speak of those who do good or who persevere and are saved: They deny causality altogether, arguing that the saved will in fact do these things, but they are not saved because they do these things. Our contention, in the case of the present verse, is more modest: We say that those who believe in and confess Jesus can be saved but not merely because they believe in and confess him. It takes more than that.
Simple: God despises “faith alone.” Proof: The Parable of the Good Samaritan. A robber leaves a robbery victim in critical condition in the gutter. A priest passes by, making a wide circle around the victim in the gutter. *He *represents “faith without works.” A Levite (of the priestly tribe) passes by, making a wide circle around the victim in the gutter. *He too *represents “faith without works.”is the pivatal passage for the faith alone doctrine, how do I handle this???
Works are evidence of faith. They do not add to nor do they maintain salvation. They are the product of a right relationship with Jesus Christ. They do not enable faith, they do not confer grace.Simple: God despises “faith alone.” Proof: The Parable of the Good Samaritan. A robber leaves a robbery victim in critical condition in the gutter. A priest passes by, making a wide circle around the victim in the gutter. *He *represents “faith without works.” A Levite (of the priestly tribe) passes by, making a wide circle around the victim in the gutter. *He too *represents “faith without works.”
Finally, a Samaritan, regarded by Jesus’ Jewish listeners as “not having faith,” by definition, passes by. He stops, bandages the guy up, takes him to an inn, pays for his room and board, leaves extra money, and makes plans to pay more money. *He *represents “works without faith (sort of).”
*Clearly, *who does Jesus prefer? “Mr. Faith-Alone #1”? “Mr. Faith-Alone #2”? Or “Mr. Works-Without-Faith (Sort Of)”?
See the answer in Luke 10:30-37.
Now, was Paul stupid? No. The answer is that Paul emphasizes different things at different times, and we have to be careful to not mindlessly enslave ourselves to that emphasis.
If Paul was really a Lutheran, why does he write what he writes at 1 Corinthians 13:13?
So, relax! Salvation is NOT “by faith alone.” God really does despise “faith alone.”
Instead, faith is INHERENTLY a “works machine.”
In effect, if we symbolize a “works machine” with this…
cartoonclipart.com/pages/steamshovel.html
…then this is what “faith” looks like…
cartoonclipart.com/pages/steamshovel.html.
Never, not once in the history of salvation, did the Holy Spirit give out a grace of faith which is dead to works. It never happened.
“Faith alone” does not really exist.
Proof: In the Parable of the Good Samaritan, which of the three would Jesus say had “faith”? “Mr. Faith-Alone #1”? “Mr. Faith-Alone #2”? Or “Mr. Works-Without-Faith (Sort Of)”?
If they are but a product and evidence, then why does James speak of them as a seperate entity which works in union with faith?Works are evidence of faith. They do not add to nor do they maintain salvation. They are the product of a right relationship with Jesus Christ. They do not enable faith, they do not confer grace.
Peace
True we are saved by grace through faith working in love…it is the grace that saves us - through our faith, BUT one cannot have faith without works (well we can, but it is a DEAD faith!)For by grace are you saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them. (Eph. 2:8-10)
We are saved by God’s grace, received through our faith. We are to live IN God’s grace, BY FAITH as well. And if we do, then it is UNTO GOOD WORKS. The works are the by-product of grace received and faith in Jesus Christ.
Peace
But you just provided another verse… you didn’t answer my questions. Please, can you?For by grace are you saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them. (Eph. 2:8-10)
We are saved by God’s grace, received through our faith. We are to live IN God’s grace, BY FAITH as well. And if we do, then it is UNTO GOOD WORKS. The works are the by-product of grace received and faith in Jesus Christ.
Peace
I was thinking the very same thing.But you just provided another verse… you didn’t answer my questions.
Nah, I disagree.Works are evidence of faith. They do not add to nor do they maintain salvation. They are the product of a right relationship with Jesus Christ. They do not enable faith, they do not confer grace.
Peace
Additionally, re-read the Parable of the Good Samaritan. Clearly, both of the two men having “faith alone” were being implicitly condemned.Nah, I disagree.
Faith and works are not ultimately philosophically distinguishable. Works are “faith in motion.” Faith is a work. If one has “faith,” one has “works will.” Proof: No one in the history of the world has ever had just “faith,” dead to works, generated by the Grace of Faith.
Faith and “works” are not so fundamentally distinguishable that works are mere “evidence of” faith. Sorry, but saying that I have “faith alone,” so that I am saved, is like saying, “I have bread, but without the grain.”
The error of Luther is assuming that there is a fundamental distinction between the two.
There is not.
As JPII simply put it, “Salvation is not by faith alone.”
“Faith alone” is a unicorn. It never existed.
You are not judged by what you do! What you do is evidence of what you are. You are judged by Christ on the basis of what you are. The fruit you bear is evidence of the type of tree you are. A bad tree cannot bring forth good fruit…If they are but a product and evidence, then why does James speak of them as a seperate entity which works in union with faith?
“You see that faith was active together with his works, and by works, faith was perfected.”
Also, if they are evidence, why are we judged by them? (Romans 2:6-8, Revelation 20:13-14) Wouldn’t we be judged simply by our faith? Can’t God read our heart? Does He really need evidence to know if we have true faith?
I’m very confused… Why didn’t He justify Abram when he had faith in Genesis 12, but instead wait until Abraham performed works and “sacrificed” his son in Genesis 22? Why does James tell us that it was Abraham’s works that justified him, instead of saying it was his faith that justified him but that his works proved it? Why does God tell Abraham that He will bless him “because [he] has done this thing” (Genesis 22:16)?
But Revelation says specifically that the dead will be judged based on their deeds. Also, I know a lot of atheists who do lots of wonderful things, but they’re bad trees… dead trees in fact. If we are judged by what we are, then why does John tell us differently in Revelation, and why does Paul say that we will be rewarded based on out works, and then go on to say it is a matter of salvation in Romans 2?You are not judged by what you do! What you do is evidence of what you are. You are judged by Christ on the basis of what you are. The fruit you bear is evidence of the type of tree you are. A bad tree cannot bring forth good fruit…
Why does James say specifically that his works justified him and not say anything about evidence or perspectives or anything like that? Also, can you show me a Bible verse which explains how Abraham’s justification was about perspective and evidence?Abraham’s works justified him from the perspective that they were evidence of the type of faith he had.
I agree with that completely, but I never though they were. I asked why James and God said that Abraham was justified by his works and why it didn’t say that his works were only a proof of his faith. You’re the one that seemed to say that works only prove faith. I was asking why the Bible doesn’t say that.Works are the outworking of Christ’s presence in us, they aren’t something we do to prove faith.
But I’ve been told that Catholics don’t try to prove righteousness to God through works, and that they know their works only come from God’s Grace. Also, where does it say this about legalism in the Bible?Legalism is attempting to prove our righteousness to God through our works.
Peace
It doesn’t work that way. Let’s look at what Jesus is saying here:So what if a tree is good but still can’t bare fruit? Isn’t that tree a dead tree. I say that because not all good trees give fruit.
In verses such as Eph 2:8-9 and Rom 3:28 St. Paul teaches that Christians are not required to perform the works (Greek: ergon) of the Jewish faith to be saved (e.g., circumcision, dietary regulations, purification rituals, etc.)You are not judged by what you do! What you do is evidence of what you are. You are judged by Christ on the basis of what you are. The fruit you bear is evidence of the type of tree you are. A bad tree cannot bring forth good fruit…
Abraham’s works justified him from the perspective that they were evidence of the type of faith he had. Works are the outworking of Christ’s presence in us, they aren’t something we do to prove faith.
Legalism is attempting to prove our righteousness to God through our works.
Peace