C
Catholic_Dude
Guest
Good question.Where’s Pax and Sycarl?
God Bless,
Michael
Good question.Where’s Pax and Sycarl?
God Bless,
Michael
Thank You.As I said earlier, I believe Rom 9-11 must be taken as a whole and I made some comments already about Rom 10, but I think I should make a few more when I get the chance.
Specifically 10:1-4 (“righteousness of God”) and v21.
He further claim that the good work that the criminal have done by rebuking the other thief
christmary4ever,Thank You.
My baptist friend state that Faith alone is
necessary for salvation. He backed this up by
mentioning that the criminal on the cross was not
even baptized.
and asking Jesus to be with him are just evidenceCode:He further claim that the good work that the criminal have done by rebuking the other thief
of faith. that faith always brings about good works
and hence w/o faith good works is impossible and
therefore Faith is the one that saves.
How are we to explain the fallacy of this doctrine.?
Thanks,christmary4ever,
Send me a pm and an email address and I’ll send you some helpful material. Also follow this thread carefully and you will have plenty of ammunition.
Since I have a feeling Catholic Dude has something prepared for us**Chapter 10
9
for, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.
10
For one believes with the heart and so is justified, and one confesses with the mouth and so is saved.
11
For the scripture says, “No one who believes in him will be put to shame.”
12
For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; the same Lord is Lord of all, enriching all who call upon him.
13
For “everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”
14
But how can they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how can they believe in him of whom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone to preach?
**
I do not believe that these verses contradict faith alone.This passage is typically invoked by Protestants as a “proof text” for faith alone and used against baptismal regeneration. It seems to say that all that is necessary is to believe in your heart. However, this verse contradicts the notion of faith alone! Why? What does Paul say in this passage? Does he say you only need to believe in order to be saved (i.e faith alone)? No! He says “if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved” In other words, Paul is conditioning salvation on faith and confessing with your mouth. In other words, Paul is saying that salvation is conditioned on faith and a work.
So I find it quite ironic that this passage that is so often used by Protestants actually contradicts faith alone because Paul adds “calling on the name of the Lord” or confessing with one’s mouth to believing in one’s heart/faith as a necessary condition for salvation.
God Bless,
Michael
Yes, Paul refers to both believing and confessing in verse 9. However in the next verse he separates them with each resulting in being saved. It could be argued then that confessing alone saves. But confessing is a compound action in that it presupposes faith in what is said. You don’t confess what you don’t believe.Romans 10:8-11 NASB
(8) But what does it say? “THE WORD IS NEAR YOU, IN YOUR MOUTH AND IN YOUR HEART”–that is, the word of faith which we are preaching,
(9) that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved;
(10) for with the heart a person believes, resulting in righteousness, and with the mouth he confesses, resulting in salvation.
(11) For the Scripture says, “WHOEVER BELIEVES IN HIM WILL NOT BE DISAPPOINTED.”
Faith with out works is a dead faith. Can a deadI do not believe that these verses contradict faith alone.
Yes, Paul refers to both believing and confessing in verse 9. However in the next verse he separates them with each resulting in being saved. It could be argued then that confessing alone saves. But confessing is a compound action in that it presupposes faith in what is said. You don’t confess what you don’t believe.
Belief results in justification; Paul clearly says this and it is reinforced by the quote in verse 11. Confessing, since it involves faith, can also be said to save without hurting faith alone. You can have other things combined with faith without making that other thing necessary.
Yes, Paul refers to both believing and confessing in verse 9. However in the next verse he separates them with each resulting in being saved.
It could be argued then that confessing alone saves. But confessing is a compound action in that it presupposes faith in what is said. You don’t confess what you don’t believe.
Belief results in justification, but that does not mean faith alone. Take for example the following:Belief results in justification; Paul clearly says this and it is reinforced by the quote in verse 11. Confessing, since it involves faith, can also be said to save without hurting faith alone. You can have other things combined with faith without making that other thing necessary.
I’ve been busy on some other threads and havn’t had time to get back here, what I can say in this quick bit regarding the ‘believe’ and ‘confess’ distinction, I am reminded of John 12: 42Yet at the same time many even among the leaders believed in him. But because of the Pharisees they would not confess their faith for fear they would be put out of the synagogue; 43for they loved praise from men more than praise from God.
44Then Jesus cried out, "When a man believes in me, he does not believe in me only, but in the one who sent me. 45When he looks at me, he sees the one who sent me. 46I have come into the world as a light, so that no one who believes in me should stay in darkness.
47"As for the person who hears my words but does not keep them, I do not judge him. For I did not come to judge the world, but to save it. 48There is a judge for the one who rejects me and does not accept my words; that very word which I spoke will condemn him at the last day.
The context here is that many DID believe Jesus was the Christ, but the social pressure (eg threat of persecution, violence) was great enough that they would not openly LIVE that belief. This passage proves there are two ‘stages’ here, and genuine ‘believing’ does not automatically lead to “confessing.”
I also just found 1 Tim 6 which uses the same Greek word for “confess”: 11But you, man of God, flee from all this, and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, endurance and gentleness. 12Fight the good fight of the faith. Take hold of the eternal life to which you were called when you made your good confession in the presence of many witnesses.
This “confession” is a public profession of a life-long lifestyle change for the sake of Christ.
