Roy Moore's Accuser Count is now up to 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoshuaIsLord
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

JoshuaIsLord

Guest

Leigh Corfman - Statutory Rape at age 14 in Moore’s House - Took her clothes off and proceeded to fondle her and force her to fondle him.

Wendy Moore - Tried to date her at age 15 - Mother forbid it - Over the year it felt disgusting.

Debbie Wesson Gibson - Asked her out on a date at Age 17 after speaking to her Civics Class

Gloria Thacker Deason - Dated her at age 18 when she worked at Gadsden Mall. Gave her gifts of Wine

Beverly Young Nelson - Sexually Assaulted her at age 16, tried to force her into acts of Sodomy.

Tina Johnson - Groped her in 1991 during a visit to his law office with her mother.

Gena Richardson - gave her an unwanted forceful kiss after a date - Met her at same Gadsden Mall

Becky Gray - Repeatedly tried to ask her out when she was 22 when she worked at Gadsden Mall
She said she complained to her manager, who allegedly told her that it was “not the first time he had a complaint about him hanging out at the mall.”

Kelly Harrison Thorp - Sought a Date with her when she was 17 when he was in his 30s
 
Last edited:
It was a few days later, Richardson says, when she was called out of her trigonometry class.

Richardson says she was startled, thinking maybe her dad was calling, and that when she realized it was Moore, “I felt like every person in that office was staring at me.”

“At that point, he said, ‘Would you like to go out some time?’ ” recalls Richardson, who says she described the call right afterward to McLaughlin, who confirmed the account. “I said, ‘Well, I can’t talk right now.’ And being so naive, and so not worldly, I said, ‘I’ll be at work Friday or Saturday.’”
Click to expand...
Wow, that’s one of the creepier things I’ve ever heard. A teenage girl doesn’t give you her phone number so you call up her school to get her on the phone?
 
I’m sure there will be a 125 Accuser Count by the time this is over with.

I like how the original Catholic Answers Forum had custom emoticons; the current selection of emoticons, the same used on Twitter, are a bit mundane and unimaginative to my liking.
 
Dwyer said:
I’m sure there will be a 125 Accuser Count by the time this is over with.

I like how the original Catholic Answers Forum had custom emoticons; the current selection of emoticons, the same used on Twitter, are a bit mundane and unimaginative to my liking.
Click to expand...
Can we prepare for your version of the Cosby Defense?
 
The DA in the signature is not for “district attorney” - Its the initials of Roy’s former assistant, Delber Adams. The entire signature is a forgery, only the “message” part looks genuine. The accuser stole Roy’s signature and the DA [thinking it meant district attorney] from a divorce paper Roy signed in the 90’s for her…He was her divorce judge - She left that info out at her press conference - and why would she allow a judge she claimed try to rape her, oversea her divorce 18 some years later? That makes no sense at all, she would not trust him. She is caught LYING. She is a FRAUD.

And there is no doubt about the forgery. The “Moore DA” and everything after was in completely different ink, you don’t need experts and tests or anything like that. It’s really easy to see. It might show up better (higher resolution) in the CNN tweet that the photo originated from

“Really easy to see?” Uh huh. Cause nothing is ever altered on the internets. Is it? You can rely that everything you see and hear on the internets must be so. Just as presented. No. There are forensic ways to verify, say for instance, how long the ink has been on the paper. Chemical analysis of the ink could probably determine who manufactured, where sold and when. Things like that. If this is a recent writing, there would be the possibility of chemical tags that were placed in the ink by the manufacturer.

So, no. I would only accept a forensic analysis of the signature and particularly the ink to determine authenticity or the lack thereof.
It is science. And science I trust.

“Cause nothing is ever altered on the internets” - who altered the photo CNN tweeted out? Was it an intern? Was it the Getty’s Images photographer? Was it someone at Twitter? Any explanation like that is a huge stretch. You don’t need a chemical analysis to see those are two different color inks. You just need to look at it at the right angle with enough lighting for the camera to pick it up, which is exactly what happened in the photo CNN tweeted out.
 
Last edited:
Divorce proceedings are normally sealed. How do you know who signed her divorce?
 
Gloria Allred and Beverly Nelson used the WRONG forgery … They forged the wrong signature!
 
Last edited:
Assuming the Signature is a fraud, does it negate the claim that he raped her?
Does it negate the claims by the other six?
 
Last edited:
Go ahead … keep manipulating … if at first you don’t find one argument that works, then maybe some other argument will stick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top