Roy Moore's Accuser Count is now up to 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoshuaIsLord
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
When I looked at the yearbook the first time, I thought that someone, perhaps her, added the notation of the date and restaurant name, after he signed it originally. Remember what her original story is. She trusted him to giver her a ride home. Instead, he drove around to the back of the building and assaulted her. She fought him off, falling or being pushed out of the car on to the ground laying on the pavement.
Click to expand...
This was just posted by coachbo at

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...es-writing-was-forged/?utm_term=.9b880cdaf6d3

Remove the two mentioned notations above. You have a fluid signature. I had thought the same thing about the first set of 1977 and name of the Restaurant, that they looked added. I was a little reluctant to mention it earlier. Coachbo put it into perfect context.
 
Last edited:
Xystus said:
you don’t need to be an expert to see the 7’s are clearly different.
Click to expand...
So what? I don’t know about you but there is often variation in how we write. Are all your 7’s identical?
 
I still have friends who insist that Dan Rather did not use falsified typed documents to attack George W. Bush when was an Air Force pilot- lieutenant.

But we know that the type face that Dan Rather relied on did not exist at the time.

But Dan Rather insists to this day that his article attacking George W. Bush was correct.

And my friends believe Dan Rather.
 
coachbo is a commenter in the article:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...es-writing-was-forged/?utm_term=.9b880cdaf6d3

This is this commenters comment:
When I looked at the yearbook the first time, I thought that someone, perhaps her, added the notation of the date and restaurant name, after he signed it originally. Remember what her original story is. She trusted him to giver her a ride home. Instead, he drove around to the back of the building and assaulted her. She fought him off, falling or being pushed out of the car on to the ground laying on the pavement.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
This woman told her sister right after it happened, told her mother 4 years ago. AND told her husband.

People like conspiracies, maybe
  1. Moore has a twin separated at birth who has been running around impersonating him looking for jail bait.
Or
  1. Hillary must have planned this for years, and planted fake memories in these women’s minds. That guy with the pen doesn’t really medicate Hillary. That pen is a secret brain memory implanter.
Or
  1. Roy Moore did these things, and women now are coming forward because they are no longer scared girls, and are tired of living with the memories.
 
Last edited:
F_Marturana said:
Hillary must have planned this for years, and planted fake memories in these women’s minds. That guy with the pen doesn’t really medicate Hillary. That pen is a secret brain memory implanter.
Click to expand...
R…O…F…L…M…A…O…
 
You laugh, wait till the gateway breitbart picks it up as a story.

🤔 😉
 
Seriously though, for those of us that have sane and rational thought.
Roy Moore “is/was/and will continue” to be an embarrassment to us Alabamians.
 
I think the guy should resign,
but I also think some of these additional examples are not that telling.

A guy trying to kiss a girl at the end of a date in the late 70’s was standard procedure, it wasn’t considered sexual assault at the time.
 
Are you referring to the girl he called at High School?

He forcibly kissed her. After calling her at high school. That’s pretty daring. He knew she was in the 14-18 range.

I find it creepy the school put the call through.
 
Theo520 said:
I think the guy should resign,
but I also think some of these additional examples are not that telling.

A guy trying to kiss a girl at the end of a date in the late 70’s was standard procedure, it wasn’t considered sexual assault at the time.
Click to expand...
A thirty-something year old guy trying to plant one on a highschool student was not “par for the course” in the 1970s.
 
Was trying to force a girl to perform oral sex against her will considered sexual assault at the time?
 
Last edited:
I found the same link and posted it.

I’m pretty confident his political career is over.
 
Theo520 said:
40.png
niceatheist:
A thirty-something year old guy trying to plant one on a highschool student was not “par for the course” in the 1970s.
Click to expand...
Older men trying to date younger women was pretty common, though skeevy.
Click to expand...
If he was after 20 year olds, maybe. I guess even 18-19, while questionable, isn’t going to cause a crisis. But 14 year olds. Sorry mate, not even in the 1970s.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top