Roy Moore's Accuser Count is now up to 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoshuaIsLord
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sen. Lindsey Graham bemoaned President Donald Trump’s support for Alabama Senate Republican candidate Roy Moore on Sunday, calling the move a lose-lose situation.

"If he wins, we get the baggage of him winning, and it becomes a story every day about whether or not you believe the women or Roy Moore, should he stay in the Senate, should he be expelled?" Graham said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” "If you lose, you give the Senate seat to a Democrat at a time where we need all the votes we can get.
 
It’s pretty clear to me that even if Moore is 100% innocent, the North American left doesn’t want to believe it. I can assume they are just that desperate to try and get at Donald J. Trump—even though Trump endorsed Moore’s opponent in the primary.

This is all coming apart for the left and now they are doubling down instead of admitting wrong-doing.
 
It’s pretty clear to me that even if Moore is 100% innocent, the North American left doesn’t want to believe it. I can assume they are just that desperate to try and get at Donald J. Trump—even though Trump endorsed Moore’s opponent in the primary.

This is all coming apart for the left and now they are doubling down instead of admitting wrong-doing.
How does one reach the conclusion that the 9 women, 30 sources, police that said they were watching out for him at high school football games and mall employees that say he was banned from the mall are all lying?
 
It’s pretty clear to me that even if Moore is 100% innocent, the North American left doesn’t want to believe it. I can assume they are just that desperate to try and get at Donald J. Trump—even though Trump endorsed Moore’s opponent in the primary.

This is all coming apart for the left and now they are doubling down instead of admitting wrong-doing.
Give it a rest. He’s been accused publicly by nine women. At this point, I have to ask why anyone would still be supporting him.
 
40.png
SuperLuigi:
It’s pretty clear to me that even if Moore is 100% innocent, the North American left doesn’t want to believe it. I can assume they are just that desperate to try and get at Donald J. Trump—even though Trump endorsed Moore’s opponent in the primary.

This is all coming apart for the left and now they are doubling down instead of admitting wrong-doing.
How does one reach the conclusion that the 9 women, 30 sources, police that said they were watching out for him at high school football games and mall employees that say he was banned from the mall are all lying?
Because, at the end of the day, all that really counts is political expediency. Morality is something you use to pummel your opponents over the head with, but it must never ever ever be applied to anyone on your side of the aisle.
 
Key word: accusations. Too many people are assuming Moore is guilty. Farthest I’ve gone with the Clintons (no pun intended) is to say I believe Juanita Broadrick. Doesn’t mean that Bill Clinton is guilty of rape, though.

Furthermore, I call upon ALL Alabama voters to vote PRO_LIFE in this election!
 
If Moore is innocent, he SHOULD double down.

But my reference was to those commenting about the situation, not those directly involved.
 
Last edited:
If Moore is innocent, he SHOULD double down.
I disagree. I think even if he is innocent (which he isn’t, and we all know it), he should still step down, because even if he wins, he’ll damage the GOP. But then again, he’s one of Bannon’s boys, and none of them give a darn about the Republican party.
But my reference was to those commenting about the situation, not those directly involved.
Why, are those commenting not permitted to draw a conclusion based upon the weight of the evidence provided?
 
Key word: accusations. Too many people are assuming Moore is guilty. Farthest I’ve gone with the Clintons (no pun intended) is to say I believe Juanita Broadrick. Doesn’t mean that Bill Clinton is guilty of rape, though.

Furthermore, I call upon ALL Alabama voters to vote PRO_LIFE in this election!
Too many people? Wow. So, if 5 witnesses say they saw Joe Blow kill someone instead of 3, you’d say Joe is innocent because too many people saw it happen.

By your last statement, I wonder if you really care if Moore is guilty or not, but rather are using this as an opportunity to push a false view of Church teaching that you can’t back up by actual teachings.
 
Sure. My comment isn’t really directed at you or your comment specifically. It’s just a general observation. I haven’t cared to follow the Moore story closely enough to form an opinion. I pray the truth wins out.
 
40.png
niceatheist:
I think even if he is innocent (which he isn’t, and we all know it),
I don’t know that, and I doubt you do either.

Desperado…
Yes, I’ll stand by it. There’s a balance of probabilities here, and thus I will state that Roy Moore is guilty of chasing and sexually assaulting teenagers.
he should still step down, because even if he wins, he’ll damage the GOP.
Yeah, cause you have the best interests of the GOP at heart.
The question is do you?
 
Key word: accusations. Too many people are assuming Moore is guilty.
His recent criminal activities that resulted in him being removed from the Office of Judge gives it’s own credibility to the accusations. As it has been pointed out before, voters do not require a Trial Court to deduce guilt. Voters only need to considered all of the verbal evidence to date, which is largely disproportionate to that of Roy Moore’s, he has very little.
 
Last edited:
40.png
niceatheist:
Yes, I’ll stand by it. There’s a balance of probabilities here, and thus I will state that Roy Moore is guilty of chasing and sexually assaulting teenagers.
Interesting. So then looking at the probabilities of Bill Clinton and Muslim male refugees in Europe…
Of course. But I’m not going to condemn every Muslim in the world for the bad apples.
The question is do you?
Principle before party.
I’m not seeing much principle in your stand.
 
His recent criminal activities that resulted in him being removed from the Office of Judge
I wonder if what he did is actually “criminal”? liberals here love to say illegal aliens are not really committing a crime because it not actually against the criminal code. Is what Moore did “criminal” using that same definition?
 
40.png
JoshuaIsLord:
His recent criminal activities that resulted in him being removed from the Office of Judge
I wonder if what he did is actually “criminal”? liberals here love to say illegal aliens are not really committing a crime because it not actually against the criminal code. Is what Moore did “criminal” using that same definition?
Quick, let’s bring up something totally unrelated!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top