Roy Moore's Accuser Count is now up to 9

[Inisfallen]

Except you did hear about it when it came out that James O’Keefe was behind it.

That was actually funny. I enjoyed the comic spectacle of O’Keefe and his crew making fools of themselves.

 

[Jig_Saw]

That was actually funny. I enjoyed the comic spectacle of O’Keefe and his crew making fools of themselves.

And yet you will hear how biased the Washington Post is and clearly this is fake news from those on the right. If they are so anxious for fake news, why didn’t they bite when James O’Keefe gave them a juicy headline? Because they are professionals.

 

[Boatswain2PA]

Indeed. I wonder if Boatswain was around during that time, because you couldn’t turn on the news for a couple of years without hearing about Clinton’s sexual indiscretions.

Yes, had been in the military for about 8 years by then. Clinton’s “sexual indiscretions”, which likely consisted of forcible rape, only became headline news when physical evidence (the blue dress) was introduced. Before that, it was “allegations of”.

The leftists here want to string up Moore on allegations, yet were willing to look the other way when Bill Clinton (or Conyers, or Franken, or Weiner) are “simply accused” of things.

How many of you approved of Bill Clinton in 1999 after news on his scandal broke?

1999 - that would coincide with his acquital in the Senate. What as you referring to as the scandal? And what all do you mean by “approve”?

SuperLuigi:

And here dv shows his extreme leftist bias. To him, Billy was acquitted in the senate, so MUST be innocent. Meanwhile, Moore is accused in the media, so MUST be guilty.

 

[Boatswain2PA]

they can justify their vote for a child molester or not.

Correction:

They can justify their vote for an ALLEGED child molester, or justify their vote for a leftist, big-government, pro-abortion Democrat.

 

[Boatswain2PA]

far more compelling than any evidence against, for example, Hillary Clinton in any of the matters that some fringe conservatives obsessed and make no shortage of judgement - even “legal” - about.

Well…except for the thousands of CLASSIFIED emails, including TS/SCI emails ,that she sent/received through her unsecured server.

That is a felony. If ANYONE in the military had done that, they would be in prison. She 's not in prison because she’s Hillary Clinton.

Some animals are more equal than others.

 

[Jig_Saw]

Correction:

They can justify their vote for an ALLEGED child molester, or justify their vote for a leftist, big-government, pro-abortion Democrat.

ALLEGED, if you choose to stick your head in the sand and deny, deny, deny, which plenty around here are quite good at.

 

[Boatswain2PA]

And if you wish to vote for a man who sexually assaulted at least nine teenage girls, that’s your prerogative.

Correction - vote for a man who ALLEGEDLY sexually assaulted at least nine teenage girls.

Alternatively, could vote for a self-avowed pro-big-government leftist who is also pro-abortion.

It’s up to the voters to decide which is less bad.

 

[Boatswain2PA]

You fail to recognize that many of the allegations were not made until after Clinton was elected and re-elected.

This is not true. There were MANY allegations that had been made against Billy C, but the media generally refused to pursue them.

With (seemingly) half of hollywood and the media now self-destructing under the sexual harassment claims, maybe the Left will come to terms with the fact that mysogeny isn’t related to conservatism.

 

[Boatswain2PA]

ALLEGED, if you choose to stick your head in the sand and deny, deny, deny, which plenty around here are quite good at

I’m denying nothing. I understand the allegations which may, or may not, be true. Or, as life generally teaches us, the truth may lie somewhere in between.

 

[Boatswain2PA]

Conservatives are supposed to be very much in favor of adherence to the Constitution. How do you explain their support (or at least the support of some of them) in view of the fact that Moore apparently doesn’t give a rat’s behind about what the Constitution says?

Conservatives favor adherence to the original text and meaning of the Constitution…no-where in which is there a “separation of church and state.”

 

[Boatswain2PA]

They sat on it until the Harvey Weinstein story officially broke and women realized people might take their experiences seriously instead of believing they were lying.

Why didn’t they come out with it when Billy Clinton had to tell the nation about what he did with a cigar and an intern?

 

[Jig_Saw]

I’m denying nothing. I understand the allegations which may, or may not, be true. Or, as life generally teaches us, the truth may lie somewhere in between.

If you think the truth is somewhere in between that doesn’t involve child molestation on at least one of the victim, then you are in fact denying. So, if you vote for Moore, you are knowingly voting for a child molester.

 

[Boatswain2PA]

We know for a fact that Moore has complete Disregard for the Law where he thinks he can get away with it as demonstrated below:

Placing the Ten Commandments monument in the Rotunda of the Judicial Building in clear violation of the 1st Amendment.

Failure to remove said monument when Lawfully Ordered to do so ( resulted in being removed from office)

Ordered subordinate Judges to Not issue Marriage Licenses to Same Sex People in clear violation of SCOTUS ruling

The first three “patterns” you have is of a judge who doesn’t follow the orders of others judges.

Conservatives, and especially constitutionalists, refer back to the original writing/meanings. In that light, please tell me where the First Amendment says a government building can’t have the Ten Commandments posted?

The fourth “pattern” I am not aware of, please provide a source.

 

[Boatswain2PA]

If you think the truth is somewhere in between that doesn’t involve child molestation on at least one of the victim, then you are in fact denying. So, if you vote for Moore, you are knowingly voting for a child molester.

Somewhere in between could be anywhere from “almost all the allegations are true and Moore is a pedophile” to “Moore contacted some of these young women for benign reasons”. I don’t know what happened, and neither do you.

If someone votes for Moore, they are voting for an ALLEGED child molester.

If someone votes for Jones, they are voting for someone who is a self-described big-government, pro-abortion leftist.

If I voted for Moore, I would be breaking the law because I don’t live there.

God help the voters in this election!

 

[Inisfallen]

Conservatives favor adherence to the original text and meaning of the Constitution…no-where in which is there a “separation of church and state.

See Article VI of the Constitution. Moore was quite clear that he didn’t care what the Constitution says, he wants to bar Muslims from Congress.

 

[MonteRCMS]

Muslims follow Sharia, which is unconstitutional.

 

[Stephen_C]

And where in the US is Sharia law followed? What this has to do with Roy I have no clue. Except he wants no one of Muslim faith to serve in Congress.

 

[MonteRCMS]

Well, there is the oath of office to uphold the Constitution.

 

[JoshuaIsLord]

Did you know that the 10th Century Arabic Speaking Jews called the Torah “Sharia”?

 

[JoshuaIsLord]

Well, there is the oath of office to uphold the Constitution.

So you are making the assertion, that Muslims are incapable of upholding the oath of office?