Roy Moore's Accuser Count is now up to 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoshuaIsLord
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It says that he is lying, which is a further indication that the charges against him are true.
To you, yes. Your hatred for him is quite evident, so you are unable to see any possible explanation.

I see it as an indicator that he did, indeed, have contact with her as a young woman. Yes, it helps her story. Does it prove anything? No
 
–separation of church and state. As a member of a larger and more diverse community, I cannot force my individual religious beliefs on others. I am sure you would not want all women in the US to be wearing hijabs.
Thank you.

But would you extend this to other behaviors? Do you support continuing to force our individual religious beliefs on others with our laws against murder, theft, and rape? Taking your point to the admittedly illogical extreme, why are you imposing your individual religious beliefs on Moore simply because you think he is a pedophile?
 
Last edited:
To you, yes. Your hatred for him is quite evident, so you are unable to see any possible explanation.

I see it as an indicator that he did, indeed, have contact with her as a young woman. Yes, it helps her story. Does it prove anything? No
I don’t hate Roy Moore - I simply think he should be in jail. Of course, I am weighing the circumstantial evidence and including Moore’s weird excuses (I am their mother before I date them) and lying (I don’t know any of those women) as a component, it is clear to me that he is guilty. I doubt you would entertain any doubts if you didn’t have a political attachment to him and he were Joe Schmoe in your local town.
 
I don’t hate Roy Moore - I simply think he should be in jail. Of course, I am weighing the circumstantial evidence and including Moore’s weird excuses (I am their mother before I date them) and lying (I don’t know any of those women) as a component, it is clear to me that he is guilty. I doubt you would entertain any doubts if you didn’t have a political attachment to him and he were Joe Schmoe in your local town.
You would imprison a man with so little evidence? I can certainly understand someone not wanting to vote for him (I wouldn’t want to vote for him), but not imprisoning him…that’s scary!

I have no political attachment to him other than some respect for his apparent originalist constitutional views.
 
Society has Laws (murder, rape, etc.) Religions have beliefs (Christmas, Easter, etc.)
Society has laws, created by legislators, elected by people, who are often guided by their religious beliefs. I can’t think of a culture/society whose laws are not guided by the predominant religion…and our laws certainly reflect our religious beliefs.

Religions also have laws. Sharia law for mohammedists. The Torah is full of laws. et cetera.

But I’m not sure how you are differentiating between NOT forcing your religious beliefs on others to protect unborn children, but yet supporting laws which force our religious beliefs on others to outlaw murder/rape/theft.
 
Typical Democrat voter I guess.

You would vote for a pro-abortion candidate? Are you Catholic??
You know, I’m getting tired of people using the faith as a club to beat people into voting for the party of their choice (usually the Republican Party). I’ve noticed that the people who do this pick one thing in particular and manage to completely ignore, or even reject, the vast majority of Catholic social teaching. It’s pretty suspect.
 
Some teachings are more important than others.

I’m tired of people pretending to be Catholic/Christian and ignoring the basic teachings (which don’t include making the Govt your mama)
 
Anyone know what the law is in Alabama regarding the replacement of a Senator who resigns? Would the governor appoint a successor? I assume the Alabama governor is a Republican?

If so, then I hope Moore wins, but then resigns and is replaced by an appropriate Senator.
 
You would imprison a man with so little evidence? I can certainly understand someone not wanting to vote for him (I wouldn’t want to vote for him), but not imprisoning him…that’s scary!

I have no political attachment to him other than some respect for his apparent originalist constitutional views.
You really think that ‘so little evidence’? Wow. It’s a wonder anyone gets convicted by a jury in this country.
 
So I take it that’s a yes, you would imprison a man for that? No wonder there are so many innocent people in prison!

No, I don’t. From what I see in the media, I think there is a reasonable doubt. Of course, a trial may change my mind, and I certainly have not followed the story extremely closely.
 
So I take it that’s a yes, you would imprison a man for that? No wonder there are so many innocent people in prison!

No, I don’t. From what I see in the media, I think there is a reasonable doubt. Of course, a trial may change my mind, and I certainly have not followed the story extremely closely.
Based on the testimony of the victims, collaborating evidence provided by others and Moore’s own problems with the truth, yep, he’d get convicted. Maybe you should follow the story more closely if you are going to post on it as much as you do with such conviction instead of proclaiming that doubt exists and, in the very next sentence admit you aren’t following the story closely.
 
Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) has scheduled a news conference for Thursday after a quick flood of Democratic senators – led by Democratic women – called for him to resign Wednesday in the face of a seventh sexual-harassment accuser.
Why Al Franken is done for and Roy Moore isn’t? Because Republicans don’t mind their candidates being sexual predators and, in Moore’s case, child sexual predators.
 
. Maybe you should follow the story more closely if you are going to post on it as much as you do with such conviction instead of proclaiming that doubt exists and, in the very next sentence admit you aren’t following the story closely
Maybe…but the articles I have read all say the same thing: Multiple allegations,some corroboration with family and friends, 40 years ago but no public accusations during that time, scant physical evidence…and he adamantly denied.

A trial would be where the jury actually listens to the accusors, the corroborators, and maybe the accused. If I were on the jury I might indeed find him guilty at that point, but I’m not ready to imprison him from news reports.
 
Maybe…but the articles I have read all say the same thing: Multiple allegations,some corroboration with family and friends, 40 years ago but no public accusations during that time, scant physical evidence…and he adamantly denied.

A trial would be where the jury actually listens to the accusors, the corroborators, and maybe the accused. If I were on the jury I might indeed find him guilty at that point, but I’m not ready to imprison him from news reports.
Then you haven’t paid enough attention. Plain and simple. Yes, he adamently denied it AFTER saying he always asked the mother’s permission to date. He said he didn’t know any of the woman and one woman turned up a card he gave her on her high school graduation.

Really, it’s silly that you keep posting so much about it given your state of ignorance on the matter.
 
I admit I do not have full knowledge of the situation, and that allows me to critically assess the info I do have.

You seem to think you know everything, so you must be RIGHT!

I think you are the ignorant one my leftist friend.
 
Jig - personal question for you…what do you do? I ask because you are seemingly on these boards ALL THE TIME! Do you have a job?

Obviously you don’t have to answer this, but I am curious…and in no way attacking you!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top