Foreknowledge does not negate free will.
Yes it does. Look it up in the dictionary. It is synonymous with foresightedness. You can’t get any more unpredictable than free will. The two are in direct opposition to each other. If you say a person is destined to reject the gospel or is inherently hateful towards it, then you are in direct rejection of that person’s ability to choose his/her salvation.
What you’re talking about is called pragmatism and we don’t base our evangelism on pragmatism, but on what the word of God says. If the word of God says that we’re to warn people about Hell and call them to repent, then it really doesn’t matter whether or not you think it “does us good”. God tells us to go, we go, He takes care of the rest.
Once again, I am not saying you shouldn’t preach about hell
at all. I am merely saying that too much emphasis on hellfire will result in reinforcing stereotypes non-believers have about Christianity being a religion of fear.
First of all, you’re misquoting me. I never said anything about the frequency of which He spoke of Hell in relation to other topics. I simply said that Jesus (and, by extension, the rest of the Bible) spoke of it frequently.
First, let’s focus on Jesus’ words and only His words for this discussion. Secondly, I am asking you to do a simple calculation of how frequently He spoke of Hell (much less threatened people with it) and compare to how frequently He spoke of other topics. You will find the former to be significantly less.
Second, like I pointed out to you, frequency has nothing to do with it. We do not get our doctrine from how many times something is said, but what is said.
Actually it does. When you give a speech, the best way to emphasize certain points is to constantly repeat it. Never fail to refer to it. Always having people to constantly focus on it.
Go into a black neighborhood and throw the “N-word” around a couple of times and then explain to them, “Oh, but I didn’t mean you”. Let me know how that works out for you.
I despise political correctness, too. But that doesn’t give me an excuse to be rude to you.
One thing I’ve learned in Linguistics class is that words must accumulate enough negative connotation over extended periods of time before they even start sounding offensive.
Fundie hasn’t reached that level I assure you. I’ve bashed with people like this and they never get worked up like you are. One even deliberately called himself TheFundie.
Furthermore, it’s that very phenomenon that causes me to despise political correctness. First ****** was bad, but then people are already getting all worked up just by the word black and instead insist on African-American. Gimme a break. Please realize that the world is not a place to make people conform to oversensitive standards.
Actually, it isn’t a good alternative for a couple of reasons.
The first and most obvious is because that isn’t how God told us to do it.
The second is that my “living via example” will not make someone understand the Gospel.
If that is how we’re supposed to practice evangelism, then why don’t we see that in the Bible?
And preaching on a soapbox is the only method that you find worth doing? Come off it. These days, all people do is talk. It’s another thing to actually do something. Talking and arguing with people (as you yourself have admitted) can be futile so why not just simply show it instead of trying to convince others with your words?
You know what they say, seeing is believing. Actions can speak louder than words.