D
devoutchristian
Guest
Vatican 2 stated that those who deliberately remain outside of God’s Church can not be saved. Would the Orthodox disagree with this?All of Vatican 2 And papal infallibility In Vatican 1
Vatican 2 stated that those who deliberately remain outside of God’s Church can not be saved. Would the Orthodox disagree with this?All of Vatican 2 And papal infallibility In Vatican 1
Homophobia? That’s a nonsense term. If you were in a public place and saw 100 people, could you pick out the gay one? Of course not.That would indeed be a much better model for Russia to follow, but sadly the Russian administration does not seem that bothered about tackling the rampant homophobia that exists in Russia, but is instead using this homophobia to gain increase its popularity through introducing laws that play on this.
The fact that people arrested on suspicion of murder will attempt to mitigate their crime through claiming that they did it because the victim was homosexual, and that a section of the public think that this is a fair enough reason to kill someone and are happy to say so, says a lot really.
Putin isn’t interested in creating a moral society, he’s just out to gain more public support through appealing to the lowest common denominator and making political capital out of prejudices, regardless of the costs. I’ll predict that alongside his anti-homosexual legislation there will be absolutely no attempt to try to tackle the extreme homophobia that exists in Russia. As far as Putin is concerned there would be no political capital to be gained from that at all, quite the contrary.
I wonder if Putin is interested in tackling the issue of abortion in Russia? Russia has the highest level of abortion per women of child-bearing age in the entire world. More children are aborted than born in Russia, where there are 13 children aborted for every 10 children born. But then again abortion is widely accepted amongst the Russian population, so there’s no political capital in tackling that moral issue.
This law has nothing to do with morality, and everything to do with capitalising on people’s prejudices to make political capital.
Not dumbed down but conditioned. It’s Psychological Warfare 101. You keep repeating the same thing, over and over and over again and it sinks in. Do advertisers spend millions on ads for no results? Same strategy.Great post as always. The only part I disagree with was the last part of your post. Nothing would happen if somebody were to pervert children’s minds on this topic here in the US, Ridgerunner. Absolutely nothing. Some conservatives would write angry letters and they would be ridiculed and laughed at and then ignored. The book below is read in some US schools by children 5-8 years old. This is what the Russians are trying to prevent.
amazon.com/King-Linda-Haan/dp/1582460612/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1371113201&sr=8-1&keywords=king+and+king+book
Why does this happen? You need look no further than this thread. After I (literally) stopped laughing, I realized how sad it is that even well-meaning Catholics who take their faith seriously have been so profoundly dumbed down my homosexual propaganda that they cannot understand or even see what this issue is even about. PATHETIC.
Sorry but “gay” is another one of those made up words that tries to distract people from what we are actually talking about. The most accurate was to describe it is "people who are opposed to homosexual behavior and attempts to normalize and affirm it in our society.With regard to homophobia, the preferred, and more accurate term is anti-gay.
Orthodox, Catholic East/West, Most Protestants are anti-living the life of a homosexual in action=gay…With regard to homophobia, the preferred, and more accurate term is anti-gay.
Sorry, but gay people are part of society. It’s rather egotistical to think it is all yours. While the church and LGBT movement look at it on different terms, the LGBT movement does a better job of understanding the entire person than does the church. Thus, gay is better, less clinical than ‘homosexual.’Sorry but “gay” is another one of those made up words that tries to distract people from what we are actually talking about. The most accurate was to describe it is "people who are opposed to homosexual behavior and attempts to normalize and affirm it in our society.
Homosexual i is as homosexual does. No need to disguise deviant sexual behavior with euphemismsSorry, but gay people are part of society. It’s rather egotistical to think it is all yours. While the church and LGBT movement look at it on different terms, the LGBT movement does a better job of understanding the entire person than does the church. Thus, gay is better, less clinical than ‘homosexual.’
It is irrational to hate someone who you do not know, or have had b no dealings with. Finding homosexual acts disgusting is one thing, but to hate individual homosexuals is something entirely different. How can you rationally hate a person that you have not even had any contact with? How can you hate someone who has caused you no personal ill will?I believe that people don’t like Homosexuals rationally. You don’t have to be irrational to find homosexual acts disgusting. Watching people march in parades, publically expression homosexuality causes a rational repulsion. There is nothing irrational about it. So if the basis of Homophobia as described is “irrational”…
So quote me from the Catechism where I have twisted Church teaching?Implying that a law designed to protect public morality constitutes “unjust discrimination”.