The error-sowing *wolf * in these cases loves to hide under the *sheep’s clothing *of *human rights *and
inclusiveness at least the severely maligned notion of these which is being pushd by the mainstream media today. Eventually it creates enough confusion to blur the line between what people are supposed to believe and are not supposed to believe . So a lot get duped or at least intimidated by this babble, because as soon as they start to think for themselves, they are quickly labeled,*prejudicial, judgmental *and/or
discriminatory . . . that is, by the accusers’ own standards - not God’s.
Some of the fluffy BS they come up with can be quite convincing on the surface too.
We’ve been given , as justification , little nuggets such as :
( I can’t help but like this one : first he says he doesn’t have his hand in the cookie jar but then admits to having crumbs on his fingers [sounds a little like me in the Confessional]

)
He said it is “inconsistent to exclude in principle a baptized person from the possibility of ordained ministry.”
The archbishop denied that the effort is a concession to “secular egalitarianism” but he said the Anglican Church must admit that “without secular feminism we might never have seen the urgency of this or the inconsistency of our previous position.”
. . . that, by the outgoing Archbishop of Canterbury ( a little too “
outgoing” , it would appear).
. . .
We utterly confuse those who already protest, hate and/or diminish the Christian faith e.g. they don’t see why we shouldn’t follow the Anglicans and ordain women or gays . . .
Now they appear to have it all in one package, and it is causing even more division among them. Actually , this same case tells us it is already at the point in the Episcopal church where women bishops are ordaining women bishops :
Election of lesbian agitates Anglicans
ladiocese.org/bishop/glasspool.html
I sure would not like to be an Anglican - :dts: - especially today. How can anyone be expected to know what they are supposed to believe when the guidlines are continually shifting to accomodate , um ,
"differences of opinion " ?
While this particular nugget from Australia’s third female anglican bishop also looks pretty on the surface ,
“It is a great thing that the gifts of women are being recognized and confirmed as being able to be used in Christ’s service.”
We can’t help but wonder when ever
"gifts of women" were not
“being recognized and confirmed as being able to be used in Christ’s service.” If we think about it, we discover it has actually been there since the beginning :
Is not Our Blessed Lord Himself, the supreme gift of women in His service ? . . . A gift given us by Mary - at her “Fiat” ? . . . and on that same note , what about His and Our Blessed Mother ? “** I am the handmaid of the Lord : Be it done unto me according to your word **.”
. . .

. . . Not only service, but profound humility too.
The gift of
self is the greatest gift .
Men and women are absolutely equal in dignity yet different in function. These differences run soul-deep. How narrow-minded it seems ,that rather than celebrating those differences - which compliment each other , some faiths would choose to pit man and woman against each other instead.
While the Russian Orthodox are spot on -
mess with ordination and you move away from unity , let’s not overlook the fact that this whole mess is causing more than several disgruntled Anglicans to exchange that floundering faith for a more solid footing in a Catholic home. Pope emeritus Benedict XVI did his utmost to prepare a “welcome mat” for them (from first linked article in this post)
Pope Benedict XVI has created a new Church structure called an ordinariate for converts from Anglicanism who wish to join the Church while retaining many of their customs and liturgical practices.