B
bbarrick8383
Guest
Interesting, so your bishop likes to play God?My bishop assures me I won’t be going to hell for voting for obama.
Interesting, so your bishop likes to play God?My bishop assures me I won’t be going to hell for voting for obama.
That’s all I’m willing to say. Believe me or not. It makes no difference to me. I was answering your rather snarky initial statement. The LOL one.I think we need a bit more than " my Bishop assured me in private" before jumping to the conclusion that any member of the hierarchy stated it was OK to vote for Obama
Take the abortion equation out of Obama’s pro abort policies altogether…It is really amazing to me that people actually voted in someone that had been in the Senate for 2 yrs and voted “present” 90% of the time, and also had no other experience in Washington…the only background he had was a Chicago Community Organizer, and they thought he could run the most powerful (or used to be) Country in the world??? …REALLY?Not a lot to hope for on the economic horizon now, and the change has been one disaster after another.
And the main response of Democrats here is to still blame Bush?!!
If Obama has had no effect, nor is capable of doing anything, then he should never been elected in the first place.
Not at all. Why in the world would you say that?Interesting, so your bishop likes to play God?
REALLY? Where do you get your information/ Is there a secret vault with talking points that can’t be disputed? Here’s his voting record.Take the abortion equation out of Obama’s pro abort policies altogether…It is really amazing to me that people actually voted in someone that had been in the Senate for 2 yrs and voted “present” 90% of the time, and also had no other experience in Washington…the only background he had was a Chicago Community Organizer, and they thought he could run the most powerful (or used to be) Country in the world??? …REALLY?![]()
Source, please?It is really amazing to me that people actually voted in someone that had . . . voted “present” 90% of the time
What would you have said if he told you that you were going to hell?Not at all. Why in the world would you say that?
That goes on the government ledger as adding to the debt, without actually spending a penny of it or having it approved by Congress. But I see your point. Madoff couldn’t have done better.None of these financial crises we are seeing are black swans. Tens of thousands of people saw them coming and these crises are a natural and inevitable result of our stupid debt based monetary system.
In order for QE3 (aka printing money out of thin air) to be effective, Uncle Ben needs at least $900 billion. He can’t do it with $600 billion. Then QE4 $1.5 trillion. QE5 $3 trillion, etc. Eventually we get an end game. I don’t know which of the every bigger hit of QE\heroine it’s going to take to kill us but we certainly know one day it will.
Obama did have a lot of “Present” votes in the Illinois legislature, for sure.Take the abortion equation out of Obama’s pro abort policies altogether…It is really amazing to me that people actually voted in someone that had been in the Senate for 2 yrs and voted “present” 90% of the time, and also had no other experience in Washington…the only background he had was a Chicago Community Organizer, and they thought he could run the most powerful (or used to be) Country in the world??? …REALLY?![]()
This is what I don’t really understand about the Democrat’s position.None of these financial crises we are seeing are black swans. Tens of thousands of people saw them coming and these crises are a natural and inevitable result of our stupid debt based monetary system.
In order for QE3 (aka printing money out of thin air) to be effective, Uncle Ben needs at least $900 billion. He can’t do it with $600 billion. Then QE4 $1.5 trillion. QE5 $3 trillion, etc. Eventually we get an end game. I don’t know which of the every bigger hit of QE\heroine it’s going to take to kill us but we certainly know one day it will.
This will be the death knell of democracy. Just as our government was founded on the principle that taxation without representation is evil, so will it fall because it allows representation without taxation, power without responsibility. This current economic crisis is but the begining.In principle it is wrong for people to be able to vote for tax increases on others if they are in no way ready to shoulder the burden too.
Yes… democrats would have us believe that 1/4 of 1/2 of 1/3 of the government is to blame.This is what I don’t really understand about the Democrat’s position.
forget who to blame, and making political hay by playing the blame game.
Don’t they see these trillions of dollars of debt, with money being printed out of thin air, as a real existential problem for the country?
How can the Tea Party be responsible? I mean, if this is the reality, wouldn’t the problem be even bigger if forces of a more conservative fiscal party were not their reigning in the spending so that even bigger wads of cash are being created in order to pay for interest on the debt?
I guess they must be thinking that if Obama had even more money to spend, he would be able to spend America out of debt, or that money has no real relationship to the economy of the country anyway and is really just as easy as hitting a computer button to get more, with no consequences?
Maybe I am too simple to understand, but it is as the left is in a whole different reality than the one that I can relate to.
Excellent points.This is what I don’t really understand about the Democrat’s position.
forget who to blame, and making political hay by playing the blame game.
Don’t they see these trillions of dollars of debt, with money being printed out of thin air, as a real existential problem for the country?
How can the Tea Party be responsible? I mean, if this is the reality, wouldn’t the problem be even bigger if forces of a more conservative fiscal party were not their reigning in the spending so that even bigger wads of cash are being created in order to pay for interest on the debt?
I guess they must be thinking that if Obama had even more money to spend, he would be able to spend America out of debt, or that money has no real relationship to the economy of the country anyway and is really just as easy as hitting a computer button to get more, with no consequences?
Maybe I am too simple to understand, but it is as the left is in a whole different reality than the one that I can relate to.
People on BOTH sides are to blame, but what MoveOn is spouting is nonsense.Yes… democrats would have us believe that 1/4 of 1/2 of 1/3 of the government is to blame.
Oh and please get ready for the Democrat talking points word of the week “tea party downgrade”.
Moveon gave its followers the word and now on the Sunday shows its being spewed out there. John Kerry and Axelrod used it today.
Typical liberals… need someone else to form their thoughts for them.
Not possible. Greece can’t print its own money. Theoretically, the U.S. needs no tax revenues at all. Politically, it’s a different story.“‘The Tea Party hasn’t destroyed Washington — Washington was destroyed before the Tea Party got there,’ Mr. Graham said. ‘The hope is that the Tea Party and middle-of-the-road people can find common ground to turn this country around before we become Greece. I hope we can.’”