U
UnityofTrinity
Guest
what kind of wine did the missionaries use for the Eucharist in places like Asia where vine isn’t something locally grown? Could the priests have used another alcoholic beaverage instead?
No. They had to use grape wine. Nothing else could be substituted–not ever.what kind of wine did the missionaries use for the Eucharist in places like Asia where vine isn’t something locally grown? Could the priests have used another alcoholic beaverage instead?
Although no grapes are growing here, imported grape wine, fit for the Eucharistic Celebration, is readily available. This is what we use.No. They had to use grape wine. Nothing else could be substituted–not ever.
Granted, we can’t trust everything we read on the internet, however, according to this site
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_wine
wine was being made in China as early as the 2nd millenium BC.
Hello Father;No. They had to use grape wine. Nothing else could be substituted–not ever.
Granted, we can’t trust everything we read on the internet, however, according to this site
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_wine
wine was being made in China as early as the 2nd millenium BC.
Probably the best thing I can do here is refer you to these linksHello Father;
I assume when you speak of any grape wine, that it too must have been fermented?
Correct me if I’m wrong but somewhere (though unclear) I had heard where no fermented grape wine was available that pressed grapes used to make mustum in preparation of wine making was acceptable under extremely rare cases. Could you please clairify.
I had always thought a minimal amount of alcohol in the fermentation process was required to make grape wine acceptable for consecration.
Yours In Christ Jesus
Chris
no it must be wine made from grapes and no other ingredients.what kind of wine did the missionaries use for the Eucharist in places like Asia where vine isn’t something locally grown? Could the priests have used another alcoholic beaverage instead?
In the Soviet gulag, priests would manage the Divine Liturgy in four minutes (!) using a palm for the Holy Table and bread and grape they managed to hide from their meager meals.I have read that priests imprisoned for the faith in Communist and prison labor camps, etc. have secretly celebrated mass using only a few drops of juice pressed from grapes they were able to obtain.
Interesting question this brought up, Father… the link you sent RE: 2003 states the following:Probably the best thing I can do here is refer you to these links
From 1995
vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19950619_pane-senza-glutine_en.html
And again in 2003
vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20030724_pane-senza-glutine_en.html
No.Interesting question this brought up, Father… the link you sent RE: 2003 states the following:
- A priest unable to ingest even a minimal amount of wine, who finds himself in a situation where it is difficult to obtain or store mustum, when taking part in a concelebration, may with the permission of the Ordinary receive Communion under the species of bread only.
Would that cover the case of no wine or grape juice available as well? As in, there is no wine, and due to lack of grape growing capability in some regions, back in the days before the global economy, could a missionary priest have obtained permission of the Ordinary to carry out the mass with only the bread?
Thank you for the clarification, Father! I missed the concelebrant part (too little sleep, not enough coffee!)No.
Different situations.
The paragraph you quoted refers to a priest who is a con-celebrant. The main celebrant must still consume under both species, and certainly must consecrate both.