Saddam and al-Qaeda Connections

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

gilliam

Guest
From Austin Bay:

As for Saddam and Al Qaeda: terrorists, tyrants, and criminals all inhabit the same sewer of illicit money, covert communications, and blackmarket weapons. Though secular fascists (like Saddam) and theo-fascists (like Osama bin Laden) have very fundamental philosophical differences, they share a common enemy: the US.

As I mentioned in a recent post, Saddam and Zarqawi: Al Qaeda’s Shellgame, Jordan’s King Abdullah and his intelligence services certainly believed Saddam and Zarqawi connected. Now Roger L. Simon points to information that former Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad Allawi has evidence of Saddam-Al Qaeda connections (via Mystery Achievement blog).

Who was Saddam’s visitor in 1999, according to Allawi? : Al Qaeda bigwig Ayman Al-Zawahiri.

The quote is from Italy’s AKI, with Mystery Achievement providing an English translation. Here’s the lede and key information from Allawi:

Baghdad, 23 May - (Aki) - “Al-Qaeda’s number two man, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, visited Iraq under a false name in September 1999 to participate in the ‘Ninth Islamic People’s Congress’": revealed former Iraqi Premier, Iyyad Allawi, to the Arab daily, “Al-Hayat". The Shiite political figure supplied to the newspaper certain information discovered by the Iraqi Secret Service in the archives of the previous regime which clarify the ties between Saddam Hussein and Islamic terrorist organizations. “Al-Zawahiri was summoned by Izza Ibrahim Al-Douri,” said Allawi, “[who at the time] was vice president of the Council of the Direction of the Revolution, in order to participate in the congress along with 150 Islamic authorities coming from 50 Islamic countries.”

According to Allawi important information was also gathered about the presence of Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi’s presence] in the country. “The Jordanian Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi secretly entered Iraq in the same period,” he affirmed, “and began to form a terrorist cell, although the [Iraqi Secret] Service did not have precise information about his entry into the country.”

These revelations were released only following those made by the Jordanian king, Abdallah II (also to “Al-Hayat,") concerning the refusal on the part of Saddam to transfer Zarqawi to authorities in Amman. Regarding those revelations, Allawi said: “The words of the Jordanian king are precise and important. We have proven [the fact of] the Zawahiri’s visit to Iraq, but we do not have the exact date of Zarqawi’ entry into the country, even though it probably took place during the same period.”

According to the ex-Iraqi premier, Saddam’s government would have thus sponsored the birth of Al-Qaeda in Iraq, as well as coordinating other terrorist groups, be they Islamic or Arab. “The Iraqi Secret Service had communications with these groups through someone named Faruq Hajizi,” Allawi continued, “who was the ambassador to Turkey and was then arrested after the fall of Saddam’s regime while trying to sneak into Iraq. The Iraqi Secret Services were helping the terrorists enter Iraq and taking them to the Ansar Al-Islam camps in the Halbija. area.” In sum, the ex-premier maintains that Saddam’s government also tried to involve Abu Nidal in its terrorist network, and his refusal to cooperate with the Islamist groups became his death sentence, which was carried out in the summer of 2002…

I googled “AKI” and “Allawi” and turned up this link to AKI’s own English-language version (Mystery Achievement did a pretty good job.)

Unless I missed a column, William Safire of the NY Times still insists on an Al Qaeda-Saddam connection. I certainly do and I base my conclusion on the ugly way of the covert world. Saddam was a Middle Eastern tyrant, a terrorist and he employed terrorists. Al Qaeda is terrorist organization with Middle Eastern roots. At some point –a moment of mutual convenience, perhaps– the thugs connect.

austinbay.net/blog/index.php?p=356
 
more from the article:

Unfortunately a vast swath of the US national media “concluded” in the run up to the 2004 presidential campaign that “Al Qaeda-Saddam connections weren’t proven.” “Not proven” is accurate, at least not proven to support a court case– but we’re in a war and operating inside the fog of war. I use the verb “concluded” instead of “argued": the cynical tone and intensity of the MSM “argument” vis a vis Iraqi-Al Qaeda connections left the impression that these connections didn’t exist at all. The truth is there were numerous indications of connections and possible collaboration, indications that would have raised eyebrows prior to 9/11 but would not have raised alert levels. But “not proven” echoed “no WMD,” and both worked into the 2004 press template “Bush lied, people died.”

A covert, terrorist organization survives via stealth. It has to cover its tracks. Some information about Al Qaeda, its people, its connections, its intentions, will take years to uncover. King Abdullah and former PM Allawi now offer evidence of Saddam-Al Qaeda connections and Allawi’s suggest potential collaboration. Abdullah’s information implies a tangential conection, but Allawi’s indicates direct dealing. Where’s the front-page reporting and 24/7 cable chitchat? Newsweek needs to follow this lead. Will Dan Rather –while he’s looking for Lucy Ramirez– try to find Faruq Hajizi, the “former ambassador” Allawi names? That’s a 60 Minutes interview we all need to hear.
 
Yep and there’s a connection with THe Saudi’s and terrorism. Are they next on Bush’s list?
 
40.png
Bantamchicken71:
Yep and there’s a connection with THe Saudi’s and terrorism. Are they next on Bush’s list?
They have always been on the list. Just handling them differently. al-Quada can’t stage in Saudi Arabia, for example. They have to go to Syria for that. They can only recruit in Saudi Arabia and the Bush Administration has been pressuring the Saudi’s to change the school system there so that they are not teaching hate. Also the state placing a blind eye on the funding of terrorism has been shut down. The Saudis know that if they don’t reform that they are on the list.

Saddam had state sponsorship of terrorism, and refused to stop it. He had to go down.

One step at a time, one step at a time. As we have been told over and over again, this will be a very long war.
 
The people who refuse to see a tie between Sadam and al-Qaeda are the same types who refused to see any connection between Vichy France and the Nazis.
 
…as hard as you may try… they were not a threat, were never a threat and as hard as some try to sell it… it doesn’t wash… we are wrong to be in iraq… IMHO…
 
Seems logical there was some terrorist connection to Iraq.

If not, why would so many of them be killing themselves and others both to get us out and to prevent a democracy from taking hold?
 
space ghost:
…as hard as you may try… they were not a threat, were never a threat and as hard as some try to sell it… it doesn’t wash… we are wrong to be in iraq… IMHO…
So what is your solution? Just leave and let al-Qaeda take over Arabia and some of Europe, while attacking the US?
 
A must read:

Secret History of the Iraq War

by Yossef Bodansky

In the months leading up to March 2003, fresh from its swift and heady victory in Afghanistan, the Bush administration mobilized the United States armed forces to overthrow the government of Iraq. Eight months after the president declared an end to major combat operations, Saddam Hussein was captured in a farmhouse in Al-Dawr. And yet neither peace nor democracy has taken hold in Iraq; instead the country has plunged into terrorist insurgency and guerrilla warfare, with no end in sight. What went wrong?

In The Secret History of the Iraq War, bestselling author Yossef Bodansky offers an astonishing new account of the war and its aftermath – a war that was doomed from the start, he argues, by the massive and systemic failures of the American intelligence community. Drawing back the curtain of politicized debate, Bodansky – a longtime expert and director of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare – reveals that nearly every aspect of America’s conflict with Iraq has been misunderstood, in both the court of public opinion and the White House itself. Among his revelations:
  • The most authoritative account of Saddam Hussein’s support for Islamic terrorist organizations – including extensive new reporting on his active cooperation with al-Qaeda in Iraq long after the fall of Baghdad
  • Extensive new information on Iraq’s major chemical and biological weapons programs – including North Korea’s role in building still-undetected secret storage facilities and Iraq’s transfer of banned materials to Syria, Iran, and Libya
  • The first account of Saddam’s plan for Iraq, Syria, and Iran to join Yasser Arafat’s Palestinian forces to attack Israel, throw the region into turmoil, and upend the American campaign
  • The untold story of Russia’s attempt to launch a coup against Saddam before the war – and how the CIA thwarted it by ensuring that Iraq was forewarned
  • Dramatic details about Saddam’s final days on the run, including the untold story of a near miss with U.S. troops and the stunning revelation that Saddam was already in custody at the time of his capture – and was probably betrayed by members of his own Tikriti clan
  • The definitive account of the anti-U.S. resistance and uprising in Iraq, as the American invasion ignited an Islamic jihad and Iran-inspired intifada, threatening to plunge the region into irreversible chaos fueled by hatred and revenge
  • Revelations about the direct involvement of Osama bin Laden in the terrorism campaigns in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the rest of the Middle East – including the major role played by Iran and HizbAllah in al-Qaeda’s operations

    Drawing upon an extraordinary wealth of previously untapped intelligence and regional sources, The Secret History of the Iraq War presents the most detailed, fascinating, and convincing account of the most controversial war of our times – and offers a sobering indictment of an intelligence system that failed the White House, the American military, and the people of the Middle East.
 
Another after the fact quarterback. You act on the intelligence you have, not on what may or may be found later. Having said that, the WMDs we did find are well documented, and the ones in Syria… well, we may have a chance to document them in the future. As far as fighting terrorists in Iraq, better there then in New York City, which if Saddam had his way would be where we would be fighting them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top