This is in respect to church and the liturgy. Women are also commanded to cover their heads. But this is not applicable to every day activity. You need to read the entire passage and not simply pick and choose too quickly.That’s just a bunch of hooey.
1 Timothy 2:11-12 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
1 Corinthians 14:34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
reason: chaos created in the churches Paul is adressing in his letters.That’s just a bunch of hooey.
1 Timothy 2:11-12 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
1 Corinthians 14:34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
Isaiah 19:1
Women were still told to be subordinate to men so your claim that women are 100% equal to men in Christianity is false.This is in respect to church and the liturgy. Women are also commanded to cover their heads. But this is not applicable to every day activity. You need to read the entire passage and not simply pick and choose too quickly.
yet did not call Him blasphemer on every occasion. Sometimes they cried blasphemy , sometimes they wondered at the power of His authority, sometimes they just left, sometimes they accused Him of magic…different responses to different contexts…If Jesus said I AM the Alpha and Omega, they must surely shout blasphemy…it has nothing to do with being a false Messiah anymore, it has to do with pure explicit blasphemy.They didn’t believe he was from God.
Didn’t they have to PROVE that Jesus was not from God but from Satan before they would be allowed to cast stones at him? Just thinking that somebody is from Satan doesn’t prove that this somebody actually is! Didn’t the Jewish authorities have to make sure beyond a doubt that it is before declaring that Jesus uttered a blasphemy? Didn’t they know their Torah well enough? How then did they happen to rule over Israel on religious and moral life, if they didn’t? Like you said, Jews are not stupid, as they were not then. On the contrary! Something in what Jesus said must have seemed so obviously a blasphemy in their eyes, mustn’t it?They didn’t believe he was from God, they thought he was crafty from the power of Satan, and that his claims to be from God were false and therefore blasphemy.
If they really thought he was from God they wouldn’t have rejected him, Jews aren’t stupid. Just mislead.
Matthew 9:34 But the Pharisees said, He casteth out devils through the prince of the devils.
He is uttering about Himself the words God uttered about Himself as if they are One or equal. Pure blasphemy…
the Alpha and Omega , the Judge, the searcher of hearts and minds is speaking…do not forget this.Revelation 3:21 To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.
First, you don’t seem to have a grasp of the concept of equality. Christianity does not say men can bear children or that women can hold the priesthood. These are “ROLES” which are clearly defined. In a marriage, there are clearly defined roles as well: Husband and Wife. They are EQUAL in responsibility and power, but at the HEAD is the husband (any husband who is physically able should provide for his family unless both husband and wife agree otherwise). And being the HEAD does not make a woman unequal in the eyes of God. Nor does it diminish her mental capacity as stated in the Qur’an. Nor does it mean she is worth less inherritance as stated in the Qur’an. It simply means she has a definied role in the context of marriage. And if she never gets married (like many women)? Then this is a non-issue.Women were still told to be subordinate to men so your claim that women are 100% equal to men in Christianity is false.
Ephesians 5:23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
Yes, and the message was twofold: Woman, submit to your husband; husband, love your wife and sacrifice yourself for her: in the Lord, this is what’s beautiful! So, it’s not just the woman toward her man, but also the man toward his woman. Very mutual indeed…Women were still told to be subordinate to men so your claim that women are 100% equal to men in Christianity is false.
Ephesians 5:23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
They stoned Stephen for for blasphemy of just SAYING he saw Jesus sitting at God’s right hand.yet did not call Him blasphemer on every occasion. Sometimes they cried blasphemy , sometimes they wondered at the power of His authority, sometimes they just left, sometimes they accused Him of magic…different responses to different contexts…If Jesus said I AM the Alpha and Omega, they must surely shout blasphemy…it has nothing to do with being a false Messiah anymore, it has to do with pure explicit blasphemy.
Except for the part of women having to be quiet in church.Yes, and the message was twofold: Woman, submit to your husband; husband, love your wife and sacrifice yourself for her: in the Lord, this is what’s beautiful! So, it’s not just the woman toward her man, but also the man toward his woman. Very mutual indeed…
Apparently they had enough proof to charge Jesus, for them. Maybe not for you since hindsight is 20/20. Like I said they stoned Stephen for just repeating what Jesus said so the blasphemy was for being a false prophet, not because Jesus or Stephen claimed to be God.Didn’t they have to PROVE that Jesus was not from God but from Satan before they would be allowed to cast stones at him? Just thinking that somebody is from Satan doesn’t prove that this somebody actually is! Didn’t the Jewish authorities have to make sure beyond a doubt that it is before declaring that Jesus uttered a blasphemy? Didn’t they know their Torah well enough? How then did they happen to rule over Israel on religious and moral life, if they didn’t? Like you said, Jews are not stupid, as they were not then. On the contrary! Something in what Jesus said must have seemed so obviously a blasphemy in their eyes, mustn’t it?
inJESUS said “Paul praised women preachers” so I think you two have a contradiction. So you guys don’t even agree amongst yourselves.Christianity does not say men can bear children or that women can hold the priesthood.
We agree. You just don’t know what you are talking about. A preacher is NOT a priest. Two entirely separate concepts.inJESUS said “Paul praised women preachers” so I think you two have a contradiction. So you guys don’t even agree amongst yourselves.
Like Jean de la Fontaine once said in a fable, “I know many men who, on this particular point, are women!” Do you think that men didn’t have to be quiet in church, too?Except for the part of women having to be quiet in church.
All right! Tell me then: what was blasphemous about what Stephen said about having just seen JESUS sitting at the right hand of God almighty? And again, what was blasphemous in what Jesus answered the High Priest? What is considered a blasphemy in Jewish Law? You can’t tell why?Apparently they had enough proof to charge Jesus, for them. Maybe not for you since hindsight is 20/20. Like I said they stoned Stephen for just repeating what Jesus said so the blasphemy was for being a false prophet, not because Jesus or Stephen claimed to be God.
Do you have women preachers in the RCC?We agree. You just don’t know what you are talking about. A preacher is NOT a priest. Two entirely separate concepts.
Who is going to do the teaching, animals?Like Jean de la Fontaine once said in a fable, “I know many men who, on this particular point, are women!” Do you think that men didn’t have to be quiet in church, too?
Blasphemy is telling a lie about God, in these cases, saying that Jesus was a man from God.All right! Tell me then: what was blasphemous about what Stephen said about having just seen JESUS sitting at the right hand of God almighty? And again, what was blasphemous in what Jesus answered the High Priest? What is considered a blasphemy in Jewish Law? You can’t tell why?
And what was their proof that Jesus actually was a false prophet? They were not able to PROVE that he casted demons through the prince of the demons…Apparently they had enough proof to charge Jesus, for them. Maybe not for you since hindsight is 20/20. Like I said they stoned Stephen for just repeating what Jesus said so the blasphemy was for being a false prophet, not because Jesus or Stephen claimed to be God.