As have I.I’ve been watching her cause with interest
Definitely. She called herself an anarchist but she clarified in one article that it wasn’t your typical anarchism i.e. down with the state! It was a little confusing but interesting.I believe she transcends easy left/right pigeonholing, however, and I pray for her canonization.
Amen to that. Someone who was firmly against abortion who dedicated her life to what we today would call “social justice” issues. She’d drive both political parties nuts today.she transcends easy left/right pigeonholing,
Heavens no! Trump personifies the scourge Dorothy Day resisted. She would have firmly supported the new American Solidarity Party.Pro Life Dorothy Day would quite likely be a supporter of Pro Life President Trump.
Pro Life Dorothy Day would quite likely be a supporter of Pro Life President Trump.
Maybe we just focus on Dorothy Day and resist the urge to make everything about Trump.Heavens no! Trump personifies the scourge Dorothy Day resisted. She would have firmly supported the new American Solidarity Party.
Wikipedia officially puts her down as an Anarcho-Pacifist, but that school of thought in and of itself is an incredibly broad one.Definitely. She called herself an anarchist but she clarified in one article that it wasn’t your typical anarchism i.e. down with the state! It was a little confusing but interesting.
Yeah…no. Day was a pacifist who was appalled at American partisan politics. Not even slightly. She remained a pacifist even in the face of the Second World War. She was a woman who saw politics as too compromised. She was not pro-life in a Republican sense, but a Catholic sense. She saw the dignity of ALL human life from conception to natural death as sacrosanct. Accepting a party that is ok with the death penalty and warfare was unconscionable to her.I think she would have been smart enough to realize that voting for a weak third party that only seems to show up at presidential elections would hurt the Pro Life movement.
No…yeah. That is your opinion. The battle lines are so clearly drawn now that politics is part of spiritual warfare. She may very well have realized that and rejected the ‘seamless garment’ ideology which allows for liberals to vote for pro abortion ideology. She might have been influenced by Saint Teresa of Calcutta…Yeah…no.
No it was her opinion. She lived for almost a decade after Roe, and never felt the need to subvert her ideals for a political party. She knew that ALL of them exist for the sole purpose of expanding their own power at the expense of everyone else, and therefore are fundamentally anti-Catholic.That is your opinion.
At the very least anyone familiar with her would have to call her a leftist.Another interesting fact about Dorothy Day is that she never voted in U.S. elections, but that doesn’t stop political conservatives and liberals from claiming her as their own. I believe she transcends easy left/right pigeonholing, however, and I pray for her canonization.
She didn’t align herself to any political party. She was an anarchist. You’re creating an issue where none exists.Maybe, maybe not. The liberals claim her but she was Pro Life and the way things stand now it is not out of the question that she would support Pro Life President Trump. Obviously she would not be accepted in the leftist ideology of the democratic party that proudly voices there is no room for Pro Life in it’s political ideology. I think she would be like Mother Teresa.
No I’m not.And you are fitting her into your political box. Anarchist or not she was Pro Life and she very well could have come to realize that Pro Life must be prioritized as the Catholic Church teaches because the left went over the deep end and advocated for pro abortion/infanticide.
Given that she worked as a journalist with The Masses, a socialist newspaper, and that she strongly identified with a lot of progressive movements, I’d imagine she’d be more favorable towards left-leaning candidates if she absolutely had to pick a party, but she detested partisan politics. And the system. And injustice in general.An anarchist then as I am now, I have never used the vote that the women won by their demonstrations before the White House during that period."
Bad form there, as you are doing the exact same thing, my friend.And you are fitting her into your political box.