D
Defensor_Fidei
Guest
Pere i Pau:
-Ted
Last Year on another board there was a discussion on whether Fred Rogers was saved or not. Sure he was a great guy, but he also was a protestant minister and his seminary formation surely touched on those people who left the Catholic Church in the reformation. I really think people like him are in deep water.Exactly Tim. This goes back to the whole invincible ignorance argument we have been hearing in Catholic circles and OBOB. We all respect the superficial layer of IV, but I feel it has been spread too thick. Much like "extra"ordinary ministers have become ordinary, so IV appears to have a broad definition, though intended for limited instances. Surely God judges, but to paint a broad stroke and claim a lack “knowledge” in the full faith allows that window of opportunity to creep in is bound to be divisive.
What is knowledge? Who has evidence, as only a limited amount of people had evidence historically like St. Paul, so is one accountable if he leaves the Church? Is a Muslim handicapped, even if he has the right resources to discover the truth? Does being a part of something an acknowledgment of truth or is one accountable because he is persuaded otherwise? Seems like everyone is going to Heaven with the current definition and thought on this issue.
I think this is the flaw in proponents of IV’s new interpretation.
-Ted