SALVATION: Who Should We Trust to Show us the Way?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChristianWAB
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
PraRFLEsEkHm:
For 2 Tim 3:16-17; the catholic view generally is: that the apostle Paul is telling Timothy “To obey tradition, and then teaches Timothy that one can come to faith in Jesus Christ without reading the new testament (since Paul is referring to the Old Testament only)” he uses 2 Tim 3:14,15 for this, which state: (ASV) 14 “But abide thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them.”
Can one come to faith in Christ without reading the New testament. Of course, because the main way people become Christians is through HEARING the word of God.

But once again, where does Catholic doctrine contradict Scripture, that one can’t become a christian through hearing the word? Where does Catholic doctrine say not to read the bible?

He learned them from Paul – One of those who was writing Scripture and came to belief directly from Christ, this is not ‘Tradition’ it is the oral transmission of the new testament while it was being written, backed up by another Epistle – 2 Timothy! 15 (ASV) “And that from a babe thou hast known the sacred writings which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.” Which only says, basically – that he (Timothy) knows that the things which are being taught to him agree with the scriptures. He is being urged to remember those scriptures, and compare them with what he has been taught. Which is only right – we must back up any oral transmission with scripture no matter who it comes from: Gal 1:8 “But though we, or an angel from heaven, should preach unto you any gospel other than that which we preached unto you, let him be anathema.” Paul can hardly contradict himself, now can he?

You have yet to show where Catholic doctrine, Oral Tradition contradicts scripture. If it is not about salvation, you’ll want to start another thread on this.

They further contend that since Paul was giving the “Oral Tradition”, that proves that their “Sacred Tradition” today is just as valid. First of all, the major flaw in this line of reasoning is the necessity of writing the scriptures to begin with. If we actually read the scriptures for what they say – rather than what we want them to say – we find that most scriptures are written (by the Holy Spirit) to correct oral tradition gone bad, the other obvious clue to those with eyes to see and willing to look is that the Holy Spirit obviously was NOT protecting these ‘Holy Traditions’ in any other way than the Written Word. Otherwise, scripture would be filled with praise for the church keeping it’s oral tradition, and filled with new information rather than what they are filled with overwhelmingly – corrections for failing to keep the oral tradition which necessitated the writing of scripture and which also provided them (and everyone else) with a written word to refer to. What is lacking in one book of Scripture is made up for in another – in this way, all things are covered, and the Apostles in question are not just sitting in one place forever writing out the entire New testament for each Church [A process that most assuredly would have taken up a lifetime], but out performing the rest of their work – spreading the Gospel to those who had not yet received it I.E: Preaching, which act was never - so far as I am aware at least - in question by anyone. What IS in question is the unquestioned obedience to (at least when it suits the Church itself, apparently) and elevation to the status of Divine Revelation, of ‘Sacred Tradition’.

Peace
Just one. Show me one Sacred Oral Tradition of the Catholic Church that contradicts the Bible. Since this thread is about salvation, it needs to be pertinent to that discussion. If not, start a new thread.

So far you are the only one to contradict Scripture by saying we are not justified by our works, James 3:24.
 
I hate to be blunt, but - you answered your own question. I am refuting the concept of Tradition stating that it is works by which we are justified. As well as Oral Tradition as a whole, and as it pertains to sanctification , [which - yes - is a major part of salvation, but separate from that in itself] since Justification and sanctification leads to salvation that ends in glorification…what else is there you were referring to for salvation?

As for your posts I refer you to the CCC:

1987 The grace of the Holy Spirit has the power to justify us, that is, to cleanse us from our sins and to communicate to us “the righteousness of God through ]faith in Jesus Christ” and through Baptism:34

But if we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him. For we know that Christ being raised from the dead will never die again; death no longer has dominion over him. The death he died he died to sin, once for all, but the life he lives he lives to God. So you also must consider yourselves as dead to sin and alive to God in Christ Jesus.35
1989 The first work of the grace of the Holy Spirit is conversion, effecting justification in accordance with Jesus’ proclamation at the beginning of the Gospel: "Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand."38 Moved by grace, man turns toward God and away from sin, thus accepting forgiveness and righteousness from on high. "**Justification is not only the remission of sins, but also the sanctification and renewal of the interior man./B]39

also paragraphs 1992 and 1995.

as for justification being entirely by faith scripturally:

Rom 3:24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:

Rom 3:25 Whom God hath set forth [to be] a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;

Rom 3:26 To declare, *, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.

Rom 3:27 Where [is] boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.
Rom 4:4 Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.

Rom 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

and many many more verses saying the same thing throughout Romans.

As for the passage in James…Works - Yes we are to have works - how else are we to Love? The Law is now Love, Not works for the sake of works or for gaining our salvation, or Justification even. We already have that - we are to uphold the Law [The Mosaic Law} in the spirit of Love - as Christ told us to, not in fear of condemnation for breaking it - which we surely will - but in Love. Love of God, and Love of neighbor. In this we are showing our Justification, which was freely given to us by God, from our Faith. Do you see?

Peace**
 
Also in the CCC Paragraphs 2017 - 2029 for justification being entirely by Grace through Faith…not works. Not ONE WORD about works - so how did this ''Tradition" start???

man - as it certainly wasn’t God.
 
40.png
PraRFLEsEkHm:
I hate to be blunt, but - you answered your own question. I am refuting the concept of Tradition stating that it is works by which we are justified.
:bible1: James 3:24 See how a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.

It is not Catholic Oral Tradition that states that. It is written Scripture.
As for the passage in James…Works - Yes we are to have works - how else are we to Love? The Law is now Love, Not works for the sake of works or for gaining our salvation, or Justification even. We already have that - we are to uphold the Law [The Mosaic Law} in the spirit of Love - as Christ told us to, not in fear of condemnation for breaking it - which we surely will - but in Love. Love of God, and Love of neighbor. In this we are *showing
our Justification, which was freely given to us by God, from our Faith. Do you see?

Where in Catholic doctrine does it say we earn our salvation? As for justifiction, Scripture clearly tells us we are justified by our works and not faith alone.
 
40.png
PraRFLEsEkHm:
Also in the CCC Paragraphs 2017 - 2029 for justification being entirely by Grace through Faith…not works. Not ONE WORD about works - so how did this ''Tradition" start???

man - as it certainly wasn’t God.
What “Tradition” are you talking about?

If you are talking about the MISINTERPRETATION of Catholic teaching, it started with Martin Luther. Otherwise, I really don’t know what “tradition” you are talking about. Could you please be more specific and cite Catholic doctrine?
 
I’m guessing that you didn’t even bother to read the CCC - supposing that you already know it, I’d guess also, is the reason. [Understanding of Church teaching doesn’t come through osmosis - you actually have to read] That being the case, I see no point in pursuing a conversation with you - as you clearly have no idea what your own faith teaches - which is that justification is by Faith - sanctification which follows Justification, and is considered [by the church] to be a part of justification, is by Faith and works. NOT works alone, or Faith alone. However - you appear to want to be vehemently anti-anything that even sounds like it might be anti-Catholic, especially when it comes from someone who is not Catholic. Therefore an honest dialog is impossible. It also appears to be obvious that your information has come primarily by word of mouth rather than honest study, that is too bad - because we all will have to answer for what we profess to know, as well as what we teach.

The tradition that I was referring to is the one most commonly held by people who profess the faith - and have no real idea what it [the Faith] teaches…which is the erroneous belief that justification is by works, rather than faith. which - if you bother to read the CCC as I suggested - you will learn. [it’s in the index under the heading of ‘Justification’, in case you don’t believe me on that either]

God Bless
 
40.png
PraRFLEsEkHm:
Using the reason and logic that the Catholic Church honors so much: does it make sense for God - who sent His only Son into this world to suffer and die for us - to leave us with only part of an inerrant, infallible knowledge of salvation in writing, and leave the rest of what we need to know for salvation in the form of an errant, fallible oral tradition? To allow the entire plan of salvation for the whole world to rest, intentionally, upon the feeble words and contrariness of man through an oral tradition? God alone is perfect, and therefore in His perfection He would not have Authored that something as priceless as the spilling of Christ’s own blood would depend upon reliable oral transmission and retention of tradition by unreliable, eminently fallible, wholly sinful human beings (See Romans 1:20-32). He is not the Author of confusion, we are; as we are all sold as slaves into sin (Ro 7:14). God does not want any to perish (2 Pet 3:19) so therefore what is needed for salvation must be contained in one place, complete, in His own Words and therefore inerrant, for any and all to find.
Oh, I see. So what you are saying is that it would be necessary for God to communicate everything in the written form, because this form prevents error and confusion? You are making the point that no person sincerly seeking truth can fail to correctly interpret sacred Scripture, correct?
 
40.png
PraRFLEsEkHm:
I’m guessing that you didn’t even bother to read the CCC - supposing that you already know it, I’d guess also, is the reason. [Understanding of Church teaching doesn’t come through osmosis - you actually have to read] That being the case, I see no point in pursuing a conversation with you - as you clearly have no idea what your own faith teaches - which is that justification is by Faith - sanctification which follows Justification, and is considered [by the church] to be a part of justification, is by Faith and works. NOT works alone, or Faith alone. However - you appear to want to be vehemently anti-anything that even sounds like it might be anti-Catholic, especially when it comes from someone who is not Catholic. Therefore an honest dialog is impossible. It also appears to be obvious that your information has come primarily by word of mouth rather than honest study, that is too bad - because we all will have to answer for what we profess to know, as well as what we teach.

The tradition that I was referring to is the one most commonly held by people who profess the faith - and have no real idea what it [the Faith] teaches…which is the erroneous belief that justification is by works, rather than faith. which - if you bother to read the CCC as I suggested - you will learn. [it’s in the index under the heading of ‘Justification’, in case you don’t believe me on that either]

God Bless
Well you are the first person on these boards to ever call me anti anything. Maybe you need to reread my posts?

If you wish to discuss this with others, I will ignore your posts and let others answer. In fact, I was thinking about you last night thinking I should invite someone else to this thread because I do not seem to be able to understand your points and now you seem to think I am a negative person.

And where in my post did I ever say that I though it was by works alone? I do know that the Catholic Church teaches that it is by Faith working in Love.

And as to what people believe, it is not what well educated Catholics believe in works alone, it was starting with Martin Luther, people telling Catholics this is what your doctrine states.

Ah, but here again, I am trying to dialogue with you. I try not to respond to you anymore since you find me so a disagreeable poster and I find myself wanting to return in kind.

You might wish to actually look into the definition of Sacred Oral Tradition. You also might wish to realize the fact that it is not usually Catholic who don’t understand their faith, but others who incorrectly state it and then people like you who assume that just because I quote James, I don’t understand either.

I will invite several others who may be able to shine the light of Christ which I so have miserably failed with you.

God Bless,
Maria
 
40.png
PraRFLEsEkHm:
Also in the CCC Paragraphs 2017 - 2029 for justification being entirely by Grace through Faith…not works. Not ONE WORD about works - so how did this ''Tradition" start???

man - as it certainly wasn’t God.
I finally realized that you were arguing the the official doctrine of the Catholic Church does not teach work based salvation, showing me from the Catechism, a fact that I was aware of;)

The “man” that started this “tradition of men” and that the Catholic Church supposedly teaches it was Martin Luther, the man who left the Catholic Church and founded the Lutheran Church. It is one of the most vicious lies of the Catholic Church that no well educated Catholic actually believes. But obviously, due to preconceived ideas of others, people seem to have trouble understanding what we mean when we quote James.

(Look at my posts. I never claimed that it was through works alone, I was simply trying to refute faith alone since James says it so plainly. It is simply through your preconceived idea of “what catholics believed” that you read works alone. I could have stated more clearly, Faith working in love and didn’t, I apologize for that.)

When most Non-Catholics refer to “traditions of men” of the Catholic Church, they honestly believe that the Catholic Church officially teach those things. They do Not mean that it is just a commonly held belief of Catholics. (Commonly held beliefs of former Catholics and non-Catholics? Yes. But not among Catholics themselves.)

As you found yourself, the Catholic Church has not taught nor ever taught that we earn our way to heaven on our works. The belief otherwise is NOT a “Tradition” of the Catholic Church, formal or informal.

It is refered to as a “Tradition of men” as a way to mock
authenticly Catholic “Sacred Oral Traditions” by those who are ignorant of the real teaching of the Catholic Church.

Just a note. Most Catholics here on these boards Have read their catechism, including me. You made some assumptions about me that were simply untrue. I unfortunately did not catch on as quick as I should have that you were arguing that the CCC did not teach works based salvation. I have never had that particular argument from a non-Catholic before, so forgive me for not realizing sooner what you were actually saying.

God Bless,
Maria
 
Tantum ergo:
Looks like it’s time for the OP to start another thread; Orion, Maria et. al have shown that there there is absolutely no contradiction in the teachings of salvation as shown in the Bible and as taught in the Catholic faith.

Next question?
Sorry for the delay. I had a major life crisis hit soon after starting this thread, so I apologize for not responding much sooner *(…though it looks like you guys did a pretty good job by yourselves). 😉 *

The one who said that we need **JESUS for our salvation is correct (…at least as far as I’ve learned about the Gospels and the Bible). However, I’ve been told quite a lot to the contrary over these past few years, which upsets me greatly because I fear that people are losing their focus. One good friend of mine who has been a faithful Catholic for over sixty years just recently told me that if I don’t pray the Hail Mary or the Rosary, I’d go to hell. I said, *“What about believing and trusting in Jesus?” *He said, “Well, that’s important, too.”

TOO?!?!? I couldn’t believe my ears.

From what I could gather in reading the Catechism, it teaches that salvation is available only through the Catholic church! The Second Vatican Council’s Decree on Ecumenism explains it like this: *“For it is through Christ’s Catholic Church alone, which is the universal help toward salvation, that the fullness of the means of salvation can be obtained.” (Pg. 215, #816) *

“…all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body: Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation…” (Pg. 224, #846)

The Catholic church also teaches that the sacraments are necessary for salvation as well*(Pg. 292, #1129),* but I won’t delve too deeply into that at the moment, lest I veer off-topic. So, I’ll start with just one question for now:

If the Roman Catholic church is what we need to be saved, then how do you explain the thief on the cross next to Jesus?

I never saw an account of him being baptized in the Bible and I’m fairly certain he neither ate Jesus’ flesh nor drank His blood. What I DID read, however, were the thief’s words, asking Jesus to remember him when He entered His kingdom. That, in my humble opinion, demonstrated that he **BELIEVED **in Jesus and believed that what He was saying all along was the truth. And, according to our Lord, that was sufficient.

So, I’ve placed my trust in Jesus for my salvation because I believe that only HE can save me.
 
Hi ChristianWAB,

First, I believe the Old Covenant was still in effect when the thief on the Cross repented and believed on our Lord Jesus Christ. The New Covenant officially took over on the day of Pentecost. From then on, the message was, in a nutshell, repent and believe on Jesus and be baptized. And there is also the need to persevere to the end of your life in faith and holiness. This is the teaching of Scripture. And the Church.

Do you agree?

Peace,
Gene
 
ChristianWABSorry for the delay. I had a major life crisis hit soon after starting this thread, so I apologize for not responding much sooner
I am sorry to hear that. I hope the crisis had a good resolution.
The one who said that we need **JESUS **
for our salvation is correct* …*However, I’ve been told quite a lot to the contrary over these past few years, which upsets me greatly because I fear that people are losing their focus. One good friend of mine who has been a faithful Catholic for over sixty years just recently told me that if I don’t pray the Hail Mary or the Rosary, I’d go to hell. I said, *“What about believing and trusting in Jesus?” *He said, “Well, that’s important, too.”

While I too would be distressed to hear a person say that, I certainly hope you are not going to blame faulty theology of one man on the entire Catholic Church. The Catholic Church is very Christ centered.

Although I do not know this for fact, I do what the prayers of the Rosary are. They are Christ centered medititions on Christ’s life, death and resurrection. Most who pray the Rosary BECAUSE it helps them to focus on Christ.
From what I could gather in reading the Catechism, it teaches that salvation is available only through the Catholic church! The Second Vatican Council’s Decree on Ecumenism explains it like this: *“For it is through Christ’s Catholic Church alone, which is the universal help toward salvation, that the fullness of the means of salvation can be obtained.” (Pg. 215, #816) *
“…all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body: Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation…” (Pg. 224, #846)

Read again what you yourself wrote down. …**All salvation comes from Christ. **Isn’t that what you believe? All salvation is through Christ alone?

The Catholic Church has defined more exactly what that means through Scripture that tells us that Christ is the Church. We can get into Scripture if needed, although I personally don’t have much more time today. I just came for a quick look and saw that you had finally been able to post again.

All salvation is through Christ, and the Catholic Church teaches this. And as I said, later I will post, or others will, the scripture that talks of Christ being the head of the body, the Church if needed.
So, I’ll start with just one question for now:
If the Roman Catholic church is what we need to be saved, then how do you explain the thief on the cross next to Jesus?

That would be explained through Baptism by Desire. God chooses to show Himself to us through the Sacraments, but is not limited by them.
So, I’ve placed my trust in Jesus for my salvation because I believe that only HE can save me.

It is a very good thing that you place your trust in Jesus because He is the only one who can save you. Catholic Christians do the same.

God Bless,
Maria

ps I had to edit your quotes due to length.
 
40.png
Flopfoot:
No, because his profile says that he is non-denominational. If he really was Catholic then that would be a lie.

If he was a Catholic who wanted to play devil’s advocate, he would have written ‘Christian’ there, because that would be true, but we would all assume that it meant he was not Catholic. (Same effect, without lying).
But Flopfoot, you and I both know that non-denomination IS Catholic. The Catholic Church is not a domination, it is the first Church. 🙂 😉
 
40.png
PraRFLEsEkHm:
Also in the CCC Paragraphs 2017 - 2029 for justification being entirely by Grace through Faith…not works. Not ONE WORD about works - so how did this ''Tradition" start???

man - as it certainly wasn’t God.
This is because Catholics differentiate between the intial grace of justification and in the continuing state to be justified for “He who holds out to the will be justified.” The CCC quotes you gave refer to the initial grace which no one can earn. Yet, once we become justified, we must freely cooperate with Gods’ Grace in our lives for “just man lives by faith”. See "lives"s an action word.
You cannot excerpt parts of the CCC and ignore others. This is a cut and paste mentality that has no place in Christianity.
 
Outside the Church there is no salvation:
**“Outside the Church there is no salvation” **
846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers?335 Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ **the Head through the Church **which is his Body:
Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence** they could not be saved who, knowing **that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.
Code:
 Works based Gospel?  Try the Council of Trent:
CANON I.-If any one saith, that man may be justified before God by his own works, whether done through the teaching of human nature, or that of the law, without the grace of God through Jesus Christ; let him be anathema.
CANON II.-If any one saith, that the grace of God, through Jesus Christ, is given only for this, that man may be able more easily to live justly, and to merit eternal life, as if, by free will without grace, he were able to do both, though hardly indeed and with difficulty; let him be anathema.
CANON III.-If any one saith,** that without** the prevenient inspiration of the Holy Ghost, and without his help, man can believe, hope, love, or be penitent as he ought, so as that the grace of Justification may be bestowed upon him; let him be anathema.
Works based Gospel? Anathema. Salvation outside the Church? Not possible. Scriptures say so (will provide if requested).

If these references are surprising to anyone, perhaps they don’t know the Church’s teachings as well as they think…

God Bless,
RyanL
 
Christ established the Catholic Church and that’s a TRUE fact there. The CC IS THE WAY, THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE!!!
 
Paris Blues:
Christ established the Catholic Church and that’s a TRUE fact there. The CC IS THE WAY, THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE!!!
Thats not what my bible says. :eek: God Bless
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top