E
Edward_H
Guest
I think these threads need greater sincerity and objectivity.
We seem to be mixing concepts and “buying” the use of various secular terms.
“Orientation”, SSA. These are not objective, undisputed concepts, or human processes.
There are many people, some here, who would like to accept these concepts as proven and given, and natural and normal. They’re far from it.
Before accepting them firmly, one needs to look sideways to other forms of sexual behavior - masturbation, bestiality, pedophiles, voyeurism, etc etc. What logically is stopping us from labeling them similarly as orientations and “attractions” of various sorts? Nothing.
To lazily label something as SSA as if doing so makes it real is irrational.
It’s all backwards. I have these feelings, there must be a name or state for them, they must be real, they must be normal, they must be accepted…it goes like this almost unchallenged.
We seem to be mixing concepts and “buying” the use of various secular terms.
“Orientation”, SSA. These are not objective, undisputed concepts, or human processes.
There are many people, some here, who would like to accept these concepts as proven and given, and natural and normal. They’re far from it.
Before accepting them firmly, one needs to look sideways to other forms of sexual behavior - masturbation, bestiality, pedophiles, voyeurism, etc etc. What logically is stopping us from labeling them similarly as orientations and “attractions” of various sorts? Nothing.
To lazily label something as SSA as if doing so makes it real is irrational.
It’s all backwards. I have these feelings, there must be a name or state for them, they must be real, they must be normal, they must be accepted…it goes like this almost unchallenged.