Actually I have this article handy,
raven1.net/ra1.htm this was a Precedent setting case won on Feb. 22, 1999. You can read the whole article yourself, but here is the Courts Memorandum.
**In the United States District Court
For the District of Nebraska
Paul A. Bonacci, Plaintiff 4:CV91-3037
vs
Lawrence E. King, Defendant Memorandum of Decision
On February 27, 1998, I found that default judgment should be
entered against the defendant Lawrence E. King in favor of the
plaintiff, Paul A. Bonacci. A trial on the issue of the damages due
the plaintiff by that defendant was had on February 5, 1999.
Two counts are alleged against the defendant: King in the
complaint. Count V alleges a conspiracy with public officers to
deprive the plaintiff of his civil rights, designed to continue to
subject the plaintiff to emotional abuse and to prevent him from
informing authorities of criminal conduct. Count VIII charges
battery, false imprisonment, infliction of emotional distress,
negligence and conspiracy to deprive the plaintiff of civil rights.
Between December 1980 and 1988, the complaint alleges, the
defendant King continually subjected the plaintiff to repeated
sexual assaults, false imprisonments, infliction of extreme
emotional distress, organized and directed satanic rituals, forced
the plaintiff to “scavenge” for children to be a part of the
defendant King’s sexual abuse and pornography ring, forced the
plaintiff to engage in numerous masochistic orgies with other minor
children. The defendant King’s default has made those allegations
true against him. The issue now is the relief to be granted
monetarily.
The now uncontradicted evidence is that the plaintiff has suffered
much. He has suffered burns, broken fingers, beating of the head
and face and other indignities by the wrongful actions of the
defendant King. In addition to the misery of going through the
experiences just related over a period of eight years, the
plaintiff has suffered the lingering results to the present time.
He is a victim of multiple personality disorder, involving as many
as fourteen distinct personalities aside from his primary
personality. He has given up a desired military career and received
threats on his life. He suffers from sleeplessness, has bad dreams,
has difficulty in holding a job, is fearful that others are
following him, fears getting killed, has depressing flashbacks, and
is verbally violent on occasion, all in connection with the
multiple personality disorder and caused by the wrongful activities
of the defendant King.
Almost certainly the defendant King has little remaining financial
resources, but a fair judgment to compensate the plaintiff is
necessary. For the sixteen years since the abuse of the plaintiff
began I conclude that a fair compensation for the damages he has
suffered is $800,000. A punitive damage award also is justified,
but the amount needs to be limited because of the small effect that
such a judgment would have on the defendant King, given his
financial condition and presence in prison. I deem the punitive
damage award of $200,000 to be adequate. Dated February 19, 1999.
By the Court /s/Warren Urborn United States Senior District Judge**
BTW, The False Memory Syndrome Foundation and Religious Tolerance have known each other for quite some time. They are as thick as thieves and have links to each others site and quote each other in their articles and newsletters. The FMSF is cited many times as one of their sources,
Tomorrow I will list all the original members, the complaints, and the charges against them.
Except for this one, Ralph Underwager, he is the disgraced co-founder, Lutheran pastor, and friends of the Freyd couple. He was forced to step down after his interview with PAIDIKA,
nostatusquo.com/ACLU/NudistHallofShame/Underwager2.html a pedophile magazine overseas:
** Paedophiles are too defensive. They go around saying, “You people out there are saying that what I choose is bad, that it’s no good. You’re putting me in prison, you’re doing all these terrible things to me. I have to define my love as being in some way or other illicit.” What I think is that paedophiles can make the assertion that the pursuit of intimacy and love is what they choose. With boldness, they can say, “I believe this is in fact part of God’s will.” They have the right to make these statements for themselves as personal choices. **
He received scathing remarks as an expert witness in this archived Journal of American Judges Association, go down to page 14.
aja.ncsc.dni.us/courtrv/cr35-1/cr35-1.pdf
He is a piece of work, said this to a group of British reporters in 1994:
"scientific evidence" proved 60% of all women molested as children believed the experience was "good for them."
I will link some of the actual Court documents tomorrow for a few of the other cases and the legal issues of the remaining co-founders, (married couple, formerly step siblings, who sexually abused his daughter) and advisers.