I am sorry to be cruel but your argument has as much credence as the argument that every bacteria has the right to survive b e i n g G O D created it.
Not saying a child/fetus is bacteria. But the living are far more important. If we can not care for our weakest members of society, that have grown beyond the womb, how can we demand protection for the unborn.
We do such a dismal job in looking after the chroniclly sick, we have no right to demand a child be born. If we can not honestly say it will be cared for. So a child is born a six month premmie and drug addicted, with out arms, and blind. Well we take care of it?
Where is that in the health care bill, why isn’t it a bigger issue? Why because it is nice not to worry about what hasn’t happened yet.
I am tired of hearing about anti-abortion campaigns and all the dollars spent while I have family members that I can afford to care for and know they waste away their days in a half profit/half government funded home. It does not matter she sits for 6 hours a day facing a cafeteria because the group home hasn’t the funds for recreation.
This is my sister, and no one seems to care …she was born ,…now she has to perform… well Val can’t… should I leave her to faith, to society. At least the government gives her bed and food. I don’ t know of any Church that would do the same.
So don’t ask me to tell heartbroken girls to feel worse for then they do, to assume they feel nothing. Spend your time and mo ney helping the worse of the weakess and then I will follow you cause. But until I see my 48 year old sister cared for and loved by all, I am not with you. The living should come first.