Snerticus, I noticed back in post #39 you told japhy:
In post #43 he then
showed you two church documents confirming that praying the rosary is allowed during Mass.
I’m just scratching my head here over your response…“
those documents you referred to are old.” What exactly are you looking for? “New” Church documents from the past 10-20 years confirming that Rosary during Mass is allowed? If so, why? You asked for Church documents and you got them. What else would it have to take to convince you?
I hope it doesn’t seem like I’m picking on you…I was just browsing this thread and that exchange jumped out at me.

I was thinking it might be an oversight.
Sorry, I haven’t been here a while because I was through debating. It seemed like japhy was taking a lot of what I said out of context and you can’t debate with someone who does that. I decided to come back because I just saw a lot of hypocricy in not what japhy said, but another poster. So anyway, in answer to your question:
Well, I know a lot of things changed in the mass after Vatican II. And I think everyone would agree. Not the substance of the mass, mind you, but the way it is presented. (and just to give you an idea of how japhy was taking things out of context, I would guess that if he/she were to respond to this idea, they would only quote my first sentence and comment on that, not including the rest of my point - ie. the sentences after that - to make it look like I think Vatican changed the whole mass, substance and all.)
Obviously Latin gave way to the vernacular, that’s one change. Another as I pointed out, was that people were not expected to say the rosary. This happened AFTER those documents japhy presented to me were written. One thing that I think may have been discussed then, is the part the rosary plays in mass. Obviously, the quote I gave saying that people were no longer expected to say the rosary leads one to believe that in pre-Vatican days, they
were expected to. So, now that they were no longer expected to, I’d imagine in some post-Vatican document somewhere, it would explain something about it, wouldn’t you agree?
After all, while I respect those documents, parts of them may be invalid today, just as parts of older (say centuries old) documents regarding the liturgy in those times may be invalid for today’s mass. I would like up-to date information regarding this. Sedevacantists can say we can do a lot of things today because they were done back then too, so what I’m looking for is current - or at least as current as possible - documentation.
I hope you understand that.