S
Snerticus
Guest
You said it below in that same post, and also:Was it? Where did I say that Snert?
As I see it, if a new teaching comes along that seems to contradict an older teaching, the contradictory teaching is the one that needs to be discarded if either of them do. Unless of course the new teaching officially abrogates the older teaching.
Fine, but I still hold to my original opinon. If you want to believe that a practice that was never encouraged in the NO Mass is okay solely by documents that never dealt with the NO Mass, that’s your prerogative. Unless the older documents do deal with the NO. I looked at the dates and just assumed there was no such thing as the NO back then.Nothing was overturned, that’s my point. Nothing was abrogated. We have two conflicting opinions in official Church documents re: a private devotion. You’ve come out and said that in this case, the *more recent *documents cancel out the older. That’s what I challenge.
The Pope that calls it a mistake may very well be a cannonized saint in the future. So if you place importance on saints, then it’s an even deal.If you want to ditch the older/newer argument entirely, let’s look at the number of opinions either way. There’s been at least three three official Church documents affirming the practice, one of them written by a saint and one (that I know of) that’s more recent which calls it a mistake.
Also, you can add from japhy evening the odds even further:
And finally, of course you’re going to find more documents for saying the rosary at mass. The Tridentine Mass was said prior to the NO. It was obviously encouraged at the Tridentine Mass. After the NO began being practiced however, there was no need for it to be encouraged anymore. There are relatively few Church documents after the NO was introduced than before. So by sheer logic alone, you will have more arguments for it, since before that time saying it was never a problem. It only became problematic after the NO. Which is what we have been talking about.It seems, from Marialis Cultus, that Pope Paul VI believed the Rosary to be a hindrance to participation in the liturgy. The Latin of paragraph 48 is:
Attamen non sine errore est, quod pro dolore?] adhuc alicubi fieri contingit, mariale Rosarium inter actionem liturgicam recitare.
The English translation on the Vatican web site is “However, it is a mistake to recite the Rosary during the celebration of the liturgy, though unfortunately this practice still persists here and there.”
I can’t seem to decipher the Latin properly. Here’s my attempt: “Nevertheless, it is not without error that, to [our] sorrow, it still occasionally happens that the Rosary of Mary is recited during the liturgical act.”
But we can throw both of these arguments out and go somewhere else for an opinion. Unless you’ve already been there. It discusses the reasons I’m against praying the rosary at mass and agrees with why I don’t condone it. But the biggest reason is that of scandal, as japhy figured out, and that I didn’t even realize it bothered me most until japhy mentioned it.
Especially to young kids - like me when I was little. One of the little old ladies I remember at mass whispered the rosary very loudly during the entire mass, or at least most of it. She never stopped when the priest said prayers or to any of our responses. The only thing she did do was go to communion. Not only was that distracting, it added to my already existing belief that you didn’t have to pay attention at mass. I really couldn’t figure out why I was getting yelled at to pay attention and here is this pious looking woman who wasn’t paying attention. Confounded the heck out of me. I think that’s what bothers me most. That even though you may be perfectly focused on the mass and the rosary at the same time, you still appear to be off in another world. I can see some adults even thinking that it is rude for someone at mass to not pay attention like that. Should we judge like this? No. Do we? Yes. I can’t make anyone else not judge something any more than you can make me have a different opinion.
And that’s my main concern with praying the rosary during mass. If, as japhy had asked me earlier, you said the rosary in your mind without the use of beads, that would be fine, as no one would percieve you doing your own thing. Or if you need the beads, they can be hidden in your hand and the rosary said silently. Again I say; it’s my opinion. But it is also other’s opinions, some who know much more about what’s appropriate in the Mass than you or I.
Of course you could be thinking about what’s for dinner or what movie you’re going to see too and it wouldn’t appear abnormal either. But that’s a subject for another discussion. One of which I fall guilty to every once in a while to my own dismay and horror.
