S
Siddhartha
Guest
There are many perspectives regarding Truth, yes. Is there only one way to skin a cat? Is it possible to be Christian and not venerate Mary?So there are many verions of the TRUTH?
There are many perspectives regarding Truth, yes. Is there only one way to skin a cat? Is it possible to be Christian and not venerate Mary?So there are many verions of the TRUTH?
SDA’s say i have to be baptized by full immersion and worship on Saturday to be saved. Baptists say that I merely need to accept Jesus Christ as my peronsonal Savior and I am saved. Catholics say i need to have faith in jesus Cheist and obey his commands to be saved. Jehova Witnesses claim i am condemned if I am given a blood transfuson and that regardless only 144,000 will gain heaven, Mormons deny the trinity but say I can beocme a god.There are many perspectives regarding Truth, yes. Is there only one way to skin a cat? Is it possible to be Christian and not venerate Mary?
Yes, perhaps Protestants should give a bit more attention to Mary. But the problem has been that Mariology has gone much too far in the Catholic Church. When I attend mass (as I often do) visible signs and symbols often appear to make more out of Mary than Jesus. I sense that the"Hail Mary" is a much more popular prayer than the “Our Father”. Etc. One cannot help but wonder if pagan goddess worship didn’t invade Catholicism way back when. After all, the first books of the New Testament were the epistles of Paul, and he doesn’t even mention Mary once in all those letters. Yet, we look to Paul for guidance and instruction when it comes to our core beliefs as Christians.
Hi Roy,
You pick out some interesting points.
However, we can’t judge an entire religion on a single “church” or parish. The things you see, hear, and otherwise experience in one parish may not be the same in another. You may be attending a parish that is devoted to the Blessed Mother, in that case then yes, they would be giving her special acknowlegement. You could even be attending a parish that practices bad habits. It happens. The Church does not condone the worship of Mary and states that very fact in the Catechism. I would go by that if I were a person trying to discern what catholicism is all about.
You also mention the *Hail Mary *devotional prayer. It’s always a curious topic to me since the devotion is to Mary as Christ’s mother and that is it. Period. She is who she is and is revered as such in that prayer. The prayer is a call to mind of her obedience and willingness to bear the Savior of the world. I can hardly equate that with pagan goddess worship, unless of course you consider Christ’s mother a pagan goddessI’m sure you don’t, I’m just saying…
We don’t see Mary mentioned in probably 90 percent of Scripture. What does that really mean? Nothing. She’s there at His birth. She’s there during His ministry. She’s there at His death. Hmmm, that’s pretty much all the time Christ is mentioned in Scripture (outside of the references to Him as The Word of course). She was there. It doesn’t matter who acknowledges her because God acknowleged her. That’s pretty much all that is needed.
Your acknowlegement of Paul’s guidance is very catholic. Sorry, had to get that in.
It’s not about protestants’ lack of emphasizing Mary. I don’t think that will play out particularly badly, but now emphasizing their simplistic view of Mary, HmmmmI found it interesting to read that on July 26 (or thereabouts) Pope Benedict XVI defrocked Fr. Vlasic, who was former ‘spiritual director’ of the six visionaries who claimed that Mary visited them 40,000 times over the past 28 years at Medjugorje. Doesn’t that suggest something? I am a friend of a couple who went there about 20 years ago. The Catholic wife was sure she saw Mary in the sky. Her Protestant husband didn’t see a thing. It makes you wonder. Over thirty nillion pilgrims have visited Medjugorje, many claiming that they also saw Mary. Apparently, Fr. Vlasic has been accused of heresy as well as refusal to cooperate with the Vatican. And he also has been charged with covering up a sexual relationship he had with a nun! It’s difficult to trust such leadership. Witness the recent scandal involving the departed priest who headed the Legionnaires of Mary.That may not play out so well. She is *not *just the mother of Christ. She has always been known to God as Blessed and as the Virgin Mother of Christ. Since the Word was with Him in Heaven, Mary was known to God. I think God’s plan for Mary is a good enough reason for me to venerate her in the same way God does, made evident through God’s message to Mary through Gabriel. Gabriel did not call Mary full of Grace, God did. Gabriel was the messenger.
I’ve never ever ran across a catholic who is obsessed with Mary. I’ve have run across some non-catholics on this forum who seem to be obsessed with proving that phenomenon. I think there are catholics who have a special bond with the Mother of Christ. Are you saying that’s wrong?
Just for curiosity, if we imagine all the angels in Heaven at the time of Christ’s birth on earth, how do you imagine they would address His Virgin Mother? What would *they *call her? We don’t address her in any way that is contrary to that scenario. We as catholics truly believe Mary is revered in Heaven this way.
If these same Protestants were to read what their founders had to say about Mary, though, it wouldn’t have come as any surprise or wrench in their understanding of Catholic thought. Luther and Calvin believed in the Immaculate Conception. And they wouldn’t have thought the Assumption strange or over-the-top, either since both understood Catholic understanding of Mary and accepted it. The Protestant world has long moved away from their positions to ones they would not recognize.A BRIEF REJOINDER
Code:I have never heard a Protestant criticize Mary. That is ridiculous. This thread raises the issue of Protestants and Mary, which is why we are discussing her here. There is a big gap between Catholic veneration of Mary and Protestant appreciation of Mary. This became accentuated when in 1854 Pius IX defined the Immaculate Conception - Mary the only human to be born without sin - and in 1950 when Pius XII defined the Assumption of Mary.
The Catholic Church does respect the views of other Christians, but it cannot deny the truth in order to be accommodating. Most Protestants are what is termed material heretics, which simply means they aren’t culpable of heresy having been taught from birth to believe those things that are in opposition to Church teaching. And the Church teaches that there is truth in every body of believers, even non-Christians. What it says about itself is that the fullness of truth subsists within the Church. That means the Church has all the truth necessary to salvation, not that it has a corner on all truth.Code:Most Protestants who give the subject thought (and many don't) simply disagree with several key Catholic doctrines and rites that focus on Mary. Ecumenical Protestants like myself are willing to respect different Christians and their beliefs. We believe in the 'big tent' - the idea that Christians should be free to embrace various understandings of the gospel. The problem arises in large part because the Catholic Church keeps insisting that it alone has the full truth and that Protestantism in whatever form is a heresy that needs to be condemned. Sorry, but that's what I keep reading here on CAF. Fortunately, millions of Catholic laity are more open-minded than that, including my Catholic friends. Different strokes for different folks. I'm sure that God in God's enormous wisdom and compassion will not condemn Christians who seek to serve the Kingdom but have opinions that differ from one another.
Code:Some people need an authoritarian faith that preaches the one and only truth. Perhaps it gives them a feeling of superiority. Many of us don't mind that, but we want to explore issues of faith without limits imposed by any church. My own view is that this contributes to the majesty and mystery of God.
I hold absolutely to the truths of the Catholic Church but I in no way feel superior to those who don’t. I feel privileged to have access to the whole truth that will aid me to salvation. I respect fellow Christians for all the good things they hold to and the good work they do in the world. I pray daily for all who do a good work because those who are working for the same things are my brothers be they Catholics, Protestants, Hindu or whatever.Code:God bless all those who seek to serve our one Lord, and may religion become a bridge and not a barrier between us.
Above all the prophicies summed up elequently.:yup:
God breaks into history through Mary’s yes reverseing, the devil’s interpretaton,>>[surely you shall not die]<< of God’s command to Adam and Eve not to eat of the tree. Mary’s yes reverses death to a flow of life to the world, allowing the Word into the world.:yup:
Peace and God bless onenow1
Calling her a vessel isn’t criticism? I can almost understand males being ignorant enough to say this, but even women say this.I have never heard a Protestant criticize Mary.
All this is very sweet but doesn’t fit well with your other posts. I’m glad you’ve had a change of heart.God bless all those who seek to serve our one Lord, and may religion become a bridge and not a barrier between us.
Practical and theoretical knowledge should also do to assume that a virgin would not become pregnant in the first place, especially when no man was involved in any way.Do you really think I wouldn’t know that?
Come one! I finished school, have a college degree and I am married. Practical and theoretical knowledge should do to assume that a hymen would not survive birth… During history there were however people who claimed that God made it easy for Mary and the question is: How can we base such a strange assumption on scripture and why should He do that?
We can’t base it on scripture and there is no good reason to assume that this teaching that was talked about back then was true. All this does is emphasize Mary’s supposed status, but emphasis is not a good reason to assume truthfulness.
I wonder at the notion that 2+2 can be viewed in several ways. To those who accept the truth, the answer is always 4. To those who think there are many paths to the truth, believe that so long as you are sincere in your belief, 3, 5, 6, or 1,346 are all legitimate persepctives regarding the truth.There are many perspectives regarding Truth, yes. Is there only one way to skin a cat? Is it possible to be Christian and not venerate Mary?
That is something that you can hear from Catholics are lot more often than from Protestants… It is however true that God uses people to do His will. It is actually an honor.Calling her a vessel isn’t criticism? I can almost understand males being ignorant enough to say this, but even women say this.
So you think God “used” Mary? Oh My. !That is something that you can hear from Catholics are lot more often than from Protestants… It is however true that God uses people to do His will. It is actually an honor.
"Practical and theoretical knowledge should do to assume that a hymen would not survive birth… "Do you really think I wouldn’t know that?
Come one! I finished school, have a college degree and I am married. Practical and theoretical knowledge should do to assume that a hymen would not survive birth… During history there were however people who claimed that God made it easy for Mary and the question is: How can we base such a strange assumption on scripture and why should He do that?
We can’t base it on scripture and there is no good reason to assume that this teaching that was talked about back then was true. All this does is emphasize Mary’s supposed status, but emphasis is not a good reason to assume truthfulness.
Again, it is protestant’s simplistic view that is so utterly hurtful. Very much proof that they don’t enjoy the fullness of Truth, IMHO.So you think God “used” Mary? Oh My. !
Yes.So you think God “used” Mary?
Wait! I never did that. I said somebody else did so (and I linked to the text.)"Practical and theoretical knowledge should do to assume that a hymen would not survive birth… "
I apologize for the way this is about to sound, but since when is virginity based on the physical state of a person’s body or any part thereof? There are people born without them for goodness sake! This is rediculous and very grammer-school.
I can’t believe you’ve actually diminished The Blessed Virgin Mary’s role in Christ’s life to a question of an intact *hymen. *
Quit telling me I said something I never did say or mean. Apart from the fact that I think that she had other children after Jesus (detroying her virginity that way) I found that there were Catholic teachers who assumed that the birth was miraculous too… and that is what I described.Well when I was Catholic I wasn’t aware of that teaching either…
I just read it somewhere… Thomas Aquinas’s teachings (Summa Theologiae III.28.2) state that Mary gave birth painlessly in miraculous fashion without opening of the womb and without injury to the hymen as did Pope Paul IV’s Cum quorundam of 7 August 1555 at the Council of Trent… I was trying to get a link for Cum quorundam, but for whatever reason said pope is left out on papalencyclicals.net…
So Mary was a “baby mamma” ,so to speak? Her only importance was a warm womb for God to park his son in for 9 months?Yes.
Wait! I never did that. I said somebody else did so (and I linked to the text.)
Okay, would you say there is room for error here on earth? Don’t get so excited if you didn’t actually say something. I misread your post.A hymen can be lost during sports activities… Virginity not. The teaching that Jesus was born without the hymen being broken was not my idea… and I also never said that Mary’s virginity was lost during birth. I only said that her physical wholeness must have been lost due to childbirth…
I apologize.
I think we are getting off-track with our own interpretations here.Yes.
I don’t follow.That is something that you can hear from Catholics are lot more often than from Protestants… It is however true that God uses people to do His will. It is actually an honor.
Originally Posted by estesbob forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_khaki/viewpost.gif
So you think God “used” Mary?
That just doesn’t sound like the God who is Love.Yes.
I think we have an aversion to Mary being viewed as a “womb”. It wouldn’t matter if you called said “womb” an ark…I don’t follow.
Do you mean Catholics are calling Mary a vessel?
Or Catholics are accusing Protestants of calling her a vessel?