Scientific Dissent From Darwinism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniel_Marsh
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Daniel_Marsh

Guest
Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture today announced that over 700 scientists from around the world have now signed a statement expressing their skepticism about the contemporary theory of Darwinian evolution. The statement, located online at www.dissentfromdarwin.org, reads: “We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”

discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2732

dissentfromdarwin.org/

pssiinternational.com/
 
Daniel_Marsh said:
Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture today announced that over 700 scientists from around the world have now signed a statement expressing their skepticism about the contemporary theory of Darwinian evolution. The statement, located online at www.dissentfromdarwin.org, reads: “We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”

discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2732

dissentfromdarwin.org/

pssiinternational.com/
Click to expand...
It is amazing that this list keeps showing up on these forums.

Here we go. Are you familiar with Project Steve? No? Well, then, let me help you out.
talkorigins.org/faqs/steve/

Enjoy!

Peace

Tim
 
buffalo said:
Strawman Steve">Project Strawman Steve 🙂http://www.uncommondescent.com/archives/835
Click to expand...
Project Steve is a parody of the OP’s link. And regardless of what Dembski writes, it is not to show that the participants in the DI project are wrong. The point is that the DI list is a bit of a joke. Evolution deniers cannot win with the data so they are trying to show that a large number of scientists don’t accept evolution. Great argument.

Peace

Tim

ps - when is Dembski going to produce some research showing the scientific validity of ID? Or rather, when is he going DO some research on ID? I didn’t find any on his webpage.
 
Orogeny said:
Project Steve is a parody of the OP’s link. And regardless of what Dembski writes, it is not to show that the participants in the DI project are wrong. The point is that the DI list is a bit of a joke. Evolution deniers cannot win with the data so they are trying to show that a large number of scientists don’t accept evolution. Great argument.

Peace

Tim

ps - when is Dembski going to produce some research showing the scientific validity of ID? Or rather, when is he going DO some research on ID? I didn’t find any on his webpage.
Click to expand...
Gee, Tim you think we shouldn’t spend any more time and money on this?😉
 
This is just ridiculous. The websites posted talk about how harmful “morphological” changes and modifications are, yet they seem to forget basic morpholigical changes within the Human species.

Black people have tendons attatched to bones significantly higher in the hip region. They also have 5x the melanin than Caucasians. When’s the last time you heard of a very dark skinned person getting skin cancer? Larger nasal passages to cool the air in hot enviornments.

Down’s syndrome is a PERFECT example. a trisomy at a chromosone locus, evidence of gene/chromosome duplication. HOWEVER, this trisomy is HARMFUL. But, what if it were beneficial, very beneficial? Suppose a trisomy at chromosome 14 would yield a massively strong, fast young person?

It boggles my mind that people still can’t accept Evolution. Hey guess what? **Reletivity CANNOT be reconciled with Quantum physics (Yet). ** However, I don’t see petitions of scientists screaming to teach some other theory instead. Math, biochemistry, statistics ect all are able to describe parts of the mechanism of Evolution. We still dont know the whole picture, as we dont know the whole picture of Reletivity/quantum physics.
 
BioCatholic said:
It boggles my mind that people still can’t accept Evolution. Hey guess what? **Reletivity CANNOT be reconciled with Quantum physics (Yet). **However, I don’t see petitions of scientists screaming to teach some other theory instead. Math, biochemistry, statistics ect all are able to describe parts of the mechanism of Evolution. We still dont know the whole picture, as we dont know the whole picture of Reletivity/quantum physics.
Click to expand...
Yes. And I remember seeing an article about that…something like “Einstein may be wrong”…I guess the scientists that are challenging his theory are just Relativity deniers, rather than physicists…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top