Scientists Unveil Missing Link In Evolution

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Riseof_Rome said:
So you are a liberal…explains a lot. I tried discussing this with you before on a mature level but apparently that’s not going to happen. You keep spamming links to random websites while avoiding real issues people are asking you. Make up your own mind and defend your beliefs, don’t hide behind what someone else has posted on another website.
Click to expand...
Hey, why not get your head out of the propaganda sand pit, I am neither. The world is nothing but black and white to you, isn’t it? You can sprout your Pravda-esque nonsense all you want but my points are made very clearly in the links I provide, which are neither long or hard to understand. But if you are so lazy that you can’t even click a link then get out of here and don’t bother us.
 
buffalo said:
Let’s start here:

CCC

[371](javascript:openWindow(‘cr/371.htm’)😉 God created man and woman together and willed each for the other. The Word of God gives us to understand this through various features of the sacred text. "It is not good that the man should be alone. I will make him a helper fit for him."242 None of the animals can be man’s partner.243 The woman God “fashions” from the man’s rib and brings to him elicits on the man’s part a cry of wonder, an exclamation of love and communion: "This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh."244 Man discovers woman as another “I”, sharing the same humanity.
Click to expand...
So? What does that have to do with anything?
 
I’m not the brainiest fellow nor the most thorough of readers, so I’ll ask here, to the evolutionists, of course, if it would be possible for humanity to… evolve.

Y’know, further. Into something different. And if those “something different’s” would be “ensouled”.

Because, see, I’ve my own ideas about where the species is headed… *(Just a hint, it’s a combination of Law and Order and Nietzscheanism)

Oh, okay! You dragged it out of me! Sociopathy! The only sensible step in human evolution!
*

Hey wait! That “made it God’s own image” part, that was just referring to the “soul” bit, right?
 
buffalo said:
It states Eve was fashioned from Adam’s rib.
Click to expand...
“The Word of God gives us to understand this through various features of the sacred text…”

Notice the carefully worded explanation here. Nowhere does this state that the rib pulling is a literal event. It does not say it is allegorical but it also does not exclude it being allegorical either.
 
greg_b said:
“The Word of God gives us to understand this through various features of the sacred text…”

Notice the carefully worded explanation here. Nowhere does this state that the rib pulling is a literal event. It does not say it is allegorical but it also does not exclude it being allegorical either.
Click to expand...
“God formed man and crowned his brow with the diadem of his image and likeness. . . . Only from man could there come another man who could call him father and parent;****and the helpmate given to the first man also comes from him and is flesh of his flesh . . . . Her name comes from the man, because she was taken from him.” Pope Pius XII
 
greg_b said:
Why do you keep on insisting on the literal Eve coming from Adam’s body? That has not been defined as “Ex Cathedra”, therefore it can be considered allegory/symbolism and therefore does not contradict evolution.
Click to expand...
Adam and Eve, our first parents. All Catholics are required to believe this.

Peace,
Ed
 
space_trojan said:
It was neither an insistence of the literal eve coming from adam’s body nor it is an issue of it being contradictory to evolution…being of it not within ex cathedra scope is obviously not the point either, but rather, do you believe and agree that polygenism is out by disagreeing that eve came from adam? It is such a simple question but you had to drag in ex cathedra thingy while you know very well(or did you really know what ex cathedra meant at all?) that it is off tangent for the very reason that ex cathedra (whether of the Church at large or of the pope) is affirmed only in regard to doctrines of faith or morals, but within the province of faith and morals its scope is not limited to doctrines that have been formally revealed.

Makes one wonder where on earth you learned how to debate like an beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep…but hey I don’t want to be issued warnings of membership denial or termination:shrug:
Click to expand...
Yea unfortunately I got a warning for the same thing.

This issue of creationism vs. evolution should not even be an issue. I thought this was solved long ago. Anyway, I’ll keep saying It doesn’t matter in the long run because it has nothing to do with our eternal soul. Whether or not evolution is real it should not affect our spiritual growth positively or negatively. This shouldn’t be an issue of twisting what the Church has said in the past to promote one’s own agenda.
 
We cannot accept , as catholic and christian,
the evolution theory for the following reasons:
This theory suppose the existance of a common
ancestor between us and beasts, which is wrong
because in Genesis it is clearly noticed that God
has formed the man from the dust of the Ground
and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life.(Gen2/7)
Which means this act has been made singularly:
Form from dust then give it life.( act completed)
If we accept the evolution theory , there must be suspension,
and giving life for some other form of creature, then let it
live and die, then take copie of it , let it grow with special
conditions and effects, then let it become human.
Why God has to do all these stages to form human been.
Is God somehow getting tired or has no power to make
man as it is explained in Genesis litteraly?:confused:
We are not beasts or descendants of beasts.
We are very special creatures who are destined to become
The Sons Of Gods in Gods plan for us.
The Word Of God is going to incarnate in our bodies,
and they are going to become the temples of The
Holy Spirit. They will resurrect with our Souls in the
Second coming of The Son Of God.
The creationist admit and insist in the Greatness
and Perfection of God’s Creation . Which imply
that God created every single creature, put his
holy wiseness and wisdom on it , and made it single
and distinct from any other creature.
We are only giving to understand and observe
God’s Creationist Work , But never to explain how
it is done or to imitate it.
That’s my beleif and I am proud of it
and refuse every theory that diminish God’ s work
in the Creation.
Peace and Good
Nohamaria:)
 
Once again, you people are taking Genesis like it was a modern day eye-witness account when it is not supposed to be read that way at all. One day there will be evolution evidence that will come along that even you can no longer ignore, and when that day comes the church of course will have no problem with it, but you people who, like forest pagan’s of old who believe their tree contains a God within it, are so set on hating God’s way of making life (evolution) that when that evidence comes your heads will blow steam out of their ears and you are gonna go crazy because you will say to yourselves “that’s it, evolution is real after all, so now God and my church are all false”, and meanwhile us sane Catholics the whole time will be “we’ll we knew this all along so we saw this one coming”
 
buffalo said:
The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to corrupt
Click to expand...
This is very accurate. I watched the slow, gradual poisoning of many in Christian America. Fortunately, there is an antidote. Live according to the teachings of the Church. If you have been away, come back. Turn off your TV. Pick up a Catholic newspaper or magazine. Get the Catholic perspective. Avoid fornication movies, and other immoral movies. Do not buy books or magazines that promote immoral living.

We are taught in the Bible that if a thing have any virtue, think on those things.

Invest your time and energy in doing what is right. Avoid the bad and corrupting.

Peace,
Ed
 
greg_b said:
Once again, you people are taking Genesis like it was a modern day eye-witness account when it is not supposed to be read that way at all. One day there will be evolution evidence that will come along that even you can no longer ignore, and when that day comes the church of course will have no problem with it, but you people who, like forest pagan’s of old who believe their tree contains a God within it, are so set on hating God’s way of making life (evolution) that when that evidence comes your heads will blow steam out of their ears and you are gonna go crazy because you will say to yourselves “that’s it, evolution is real after all, so now God and my church are all false”, and meanwhile us sane Catholics the whole time will be “we’ll we knew this all along so we saw this one coming”
Click to expand...
excuse me?..modern?..who ever said the book of Genesis was “modern?”…oh boy, you really don’t know what you’re talking about, do you?..so you said “one day” there will come along that evidence of evolution…by that statement alone, you’re agreeing that evolution is nowhere being a fact?

i think you’re the pagan who doesn’t know what he’s talking about…you can’t even defend what you believe in…
 
space_trojan said:
excuse me?..modern?..who ever said the book of Genesis was “modern?”…oh boy, you really don’t know what you’re talking about, do you?..so you said “one day” there will come along that evidence of evolution…by that statement alone, you’re agreeing that evolution is nowhere being a fact?

i think you’re the pagan who doesn’t know what he’s talking about…you can’t even defend what you believe in…
Click to expand...
I DIDN’T say it was modern, I said people like YOU treat it like it was modern. Good lord, I also said evidence will come along that will convince even you, I already know the evidence is right here in front of my eyes. You can’t even read English! Why not read what someone says instead of instantly pressing reply and bashing your head on the keyboard?
 
greg_b said:
I DIDN’T say it was modern, I said people like YOU treat it like it was modern. Good lord, I also said evidence will come along that will convince even you, I already know the evidence is right here in front of my eyes. You can’t even read English! Why not read what someone says instead of instantly pressing reply and bashing your head on the keyboard?
Click to expand...
ummm…errrrr,ahhhhhhh…uhhhh…of course you didn’t SAY it…you TYPED it…and your post is right there wide open, care to have it analyzed by a 7 year old what your post exactly said?

and as for wikipedia, oh boy…it is a user based application which means anyone can contribute articles to it, accuracy regardless, and anyone is free to edit articles.

indeed, little knowledge is sooo dangerous…good night, YOU!
 
space_trojan said:
ummm…errrrr,ahhhhhhh…uhhhh…of course you didn’t SAY it…you TYPED it…and your post is right there wide open, care to have it analyzed by a 7 year old what your post exactly said?

and as for wikipedia, oh boy…it is a user based application which means anyone can contribute articles to it, accuracy regardless, and anyone is free to edit articles.

indeed, little knowledge is sooo dangerous…good night, YOU!
Click to expand...
Wow, I pray you are not a lawyer, you would lose every case before a judge.
 
greg_b said:
Conspiracy theory nonsense. The Frankfurt School was pretty stupid, but it wasn’t anything like that article says. Wikipedia has the accurate info on it. In fact, many of the goals listed in your link are contradictory to Communism. Kind of odd to shoot yourself in the foot, eh?
Click to expand...
Oh Yeah - I forgot - Wikipedia is an authority. NOT!
😦
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top