J
jcrichton
Guest
Hi, Brian!On this we may well agree. I believe in all of the scriptures and I believe in the relevancy of tradition (thus am more inclined toward the High Anglican Protestant Church) than many Protestants and, with candor, find that element of the Catholic faith very attractive. However, I didn’t follow how this reply related to the question of whether the reference to the “Rock” was Peter or Christ (or the confession of Christ) nor to the fact that the Catechism appears to intepret this verse as referring to the confession of faith.
Blessings,
Brian
It’s been my experience that the argument against the primacy of Peter blinds non-Catholics when they are faced with the Holy Scriptures… they seem to want to contort Jesus’ Word to mean anything but what Jesus is saying. Even suggesting that Jesus, for no apparent reason, renames Simon Kephas/Cephas only to then tell him that “I am the Rock on which I will build my Church,” does not seem cartoonish to them–they rather believe anything but what the Word is telling them.
Since I am not one of the Bishops in charge of defining the Catholic Faith/Doctrine, I cannot tell you the exact reason why the Catechism of the Catholic Church made such distinctive acclamation… still, my understanding of the definition is that the Church sought to clarify that Jesus’ institution of Peter was not just of the man but of the office, hence the Church does not end at Peter’s or the other Apostles’ death. The succession of the Apostles was instituted by Christ as He states that nothing will prevail against His Church!
Maran atha!
Angel