K
Kendy
Guest
Yes, I agree that consequences are necessary, but only after proper instruction.Addressing the 90% failure rate. . .
One does have to put some responsibility on the students here. Let me tell you, it is entirely possible to teach, using every single command and technique at one’s disposal, teaching directly, specifically, and to the ‘comfort and perception’ of each individual student. . .but no matter how carefully one teaches, some students will not (not ‘cannot’, but will not) learn.
You can give an open book exam on a question which they have already done (as homework), had graded, had any errors corrected and the correct information given. . .there will still be some who fail, even with every possible ‘help’ given.
The fewer the perceived immediate ‘negative’ consequences to a student should he not study, and the greater the perceived immediate ‘positive’ consequences (time spent with peers or doing ‘fun’ activities), the more likely a student, even a ‘good’, capable, well balanced, well taught, carefully supervised and lovingly brought up student, will not study.
Let’s compare the average U.S. Catholic of the last 40 years. What immediate ‘negative consequences’ does he or she perceive from ‘not following’ church teaching, on any given subject of course, but let’s take contraception/abortion. Is the person subject to any perceived punishment? (and punishment does NOT mean somebody tells him or her that contraception is wrong, I mean being held to consequences like confession, repentence, restitution, etc.)
What immediate ‘positive consequences’ does he/she receive from not following? No need to consider tiresome morality, to be chaste and continent, to pursue marriage as a sacrament, to give the gift of sexual relations within a sacred and valid marriage, to consider children as anything other than ‘choice’. So the ‘positive’ consequences are ‘freedom’ in sex, ‘freedom’ of ‘choice’, freedom from ‘authority’ (after all it is one’s ‘personal choice’), ‘acceptance’ by the majority, etc.
So we have a generation and more of those for whom disregarding church teaching not only does not give them immediate ‘negative’ consequences, the disregard gives them the immediate ‘positive’ consequences of sexual ‘pleasure’ at will, acceptance by the majority, and the ego boosting of self-perception as ‘the one who chooses’. Pride, in other words. . .pride in one’s intellect, pride in one’s actions, even sinful actions; pride in one’s refusal to ‘subject’ to ‘someone else’. . .