Sean Hannity rails against James Comey, Hillary Clinton and “deep state crime

  • Thread starter Thread starter MonteRCMS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Trump could simply let Mueller dangle and twist in the wind … becoming increasingly irrelevant with each passing day.

Comey and Mueller became totally dependent on Hillary Clinton’s and the DNC-provided Steele “dossier” … written BY Putin and his henchmen … pure fiction. And really bad fiction.
 
Comey and Mueller are coming across like slimy bureaucrats.

The Inspector General issues a report demanding and justifying that Comey or Rosenstein get fired for lying … and poof … Sessions and Trump say “Sorry Charlie …, you’re gone”.
 
That is why it is called corruption.

Comey described the wrong person as being like a mob boss.

The Obamas and the Clintons are corrupt

I want my country back!
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

Obama Admin was spotless so far.
 
7_Sorrows:

The democrats have been using all their schemes and plans to make sure thw Republicans don’t have any power.

And yet people keep posting lists of the Trump administration’s accomplishments here at CAF.

7_Sorrows:

I pray that everything the liberal media and the democrats have done is never forgotten and comes back to destroy them.

That’s kind of a strange prayer.
Reminds me of the prayer the Jews put in their daily prayers against Christians during the Council of Jamina.
 
Rather, I pray that both Republicans and Democrates as well as Libertarians and Socialists and Green Party or any party, can come together respecting each other’s perspectives in civil dialogue for the Common Good.
That is quite reasonable.
 
Michael Cohen has three clients. And Sean Hannity, mentioned in the OP, has been named as one of them, although there is some question as to how serious a client he was.
Well 2 of them have paid “Hush Money”. What are the odds that Hannity has paid “Hush Money” as well. And maybe that is why Hannity is railing.
 
40.png
dvdjs:
No I haven’t. I have heard comment that Trump considered having the FBI see if they could prove that there was no tape of the episode in question. That is odd. But if no one cares about Stormy, why would they care about what is on the tape?

More important - if the report on the Prague trip are true - what was the deal with Cohen’s trip and why did he lie about it?
What I find interesting is that Trump is concerned about Melania having 1% chance of finding out that the tapes exist.

EXIST

Trump is scared that a tape exists. If a tape exists than the episode of the Golden Showers did in fact happen.

That could explain Melania’s distant behavior toward Donald in public. She believes the content of the Dossier. Does she have reason to believe the content?
No, you have it wrong. According to Comey’s words Trump was concerned with his wife believing the pee thing happened, not that the tapes exist. Comey attributed these words to trump ““If there’s even a 1 percent chance my wife thinks that’s true, that’s terrible.””

The possible existance of tapes where trump asks comey to look into the pee thing to prove it did not happen does not in any way shape or form prove that it did happen, as you seem to think.
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: And then unprompted, he brings up the golden shower again.

JAMES COMEY: Correct, yeah. He brings it up and says he may want me to investigate it to prove that it didn’t happen. And then he says-- something that distracted me. 'Cause he said, you know, “If there’s even a 1 percent chance my wife thinks that’s true, that’s terrible.”

And I-- and I remember thinking, “How could your wife think there’s a 1 percent chance you were with prostitutes peeing on each other in Moscow?” I’m a flawed human being, but there is literally zero chance that my wife would think that was true. So what kind of marriage to what kind of man does your wife think there’s only a 99 percent chance you didn’t do that?

And the reason I’m recounting this is I remember-- I wasn’t listening to him, 'cause I’m running this through my head, like, how could that possibly be true? And I said to him, “Sir–” when he started talking about it, “I may order you to investigate that,” I said, “Sir, that’s up to you. But you’d want to be careful about that, because it might create a narrative that we’re investigating you personally. And second, it’s very difficult to prove something didn’t happen.”
 
Comey says the conversation took place at a private dinner on Jan. 27, 2017, days after the publication of an intelligence dossier alleging the Kremlin had a tape of Trump in 2013 paying prostitutes to perform the dirty deed on a bed in a Moscow Ritz-Carlton suite once occupied by President Barack Obama.

Why does Trump think it is Comey’s job to prove a negative?
 
Last edited:
Oh yes, and all those Democrats and Republicans and independents in the DoJ are all going after your Super-Hero, Donald J. Trump. Tell us, do you know them all? most of them? And I betcha believe that Trump & Co are saints that shouldn’t be investigated, right?
SUPERHERO???

Goodness. You’d almost think my family didn’t campaign and vote for Ted Cruz…🙈🆘
I don’t see any group as being saints or demons, so I want investigations to go forth if there’s any suspicion of wrong-doing, regardless of party affiliation.
You were missed from 2008-2016. Where were you?
 
Oh? It’s better to have 2 ex wives, lots of ex mistresses, 130 dollar settlement to a porn star, 150 to a playboy bunny and 4 kids raised by your ex wives, one across the country.

That’s much better. What character. What was I thinking.
You are definitely not thinking right 🤔 On second thought, ignore that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top