Sean Hannity rails against James Comey, Hillary Clinton and “deep state crime

  • Thread starter Thread starter MonteRCMS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What is strange is that all the people who seem to think that this is obvious never come up with the goods. Do you evidence of Comey saying such a thing: lying to the FBI?
You have to put two things together; though not regarding statements given to the FBI. Clinton’s testimony before congress and Comey’s responses to Trey Gowdy’s questions are contradictory. Given what is now known about Comey, it’s now less clear which of them was not telling the truth, but Comey definitely contradicted some very significant elements of Clinton’s testimony. I saw it myself, and it’s difficult for me to imagine you did not. But granted, it was not Clinton’s statements to the FBI. Nobody but the FBI agents present know what she said.
 
Last edited:
You have to put two things together; though not regarding statements given to the FBI.
So the claim is false, on its face, is false, although it could be honestly phrased as a conjecture - about which the key facts are missing.

Got it.
 
Last edited:
So that the claim is false on its face, although it could be honestly phrased as a conjecture - about which the key facts are missing.

Got it.
What an ugly comment, and so undeserved.

I don’t know what the other poster’s source of information was for sure. I merely pointed out that the contradictions everybody (including you) knows about are between Clinton’s testimony before congress and Comey’s testimony before congress.

I happen to think the previous poster was mistaken in thinking the contradictions were with Clinton’s statements to the FBI. That’s not conjecture, it’s not a “false claim”, and it’s not a matter of “key facts” being “missing”.
 
What an ugly comment, and so undeserved.
It is unfair of you to call the comment ugly, but with that quick attack, I am sure that you can draw others into that line of thinking.
  1. This is about your explanation. The original poster may be able to account for the remark much better than your did. Or may agree to temper the post in question.
  2. If some one one’s to post about the appearance of contradictions - rather than claiming a case for lying that has, remarkably gone unpunished. Fine - although it could very well be that other explanations for that “appearance” might be given.
This.
40.png
Trump reimbursed Michael Cohen's $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels, Giuliani says World News
I think there are many, many more allegations of lies than there are lies. Consumption of the steady diet of lies is what undercuts the trust. A possible antidote is to hold people accountable for the allegations. Sadly, it seems that many people prefer to risk remaining captive to the lies that upholding a standard of accountability
 
Last edited:
I realize you want to characterize Trump’s statements about Daniels as lies, but there’s no good reason to think so.
 
I realize you want to characterize Trump’s statements about Daniels as lies, but there’s no good reason to think so.
Some of the Trump team’s comments on the subject are already shown as lies.
Others await further fact finding.
But their lies are by no means limited to the Stormy affair.
 
  1. In Air Force 1, he claimed to not know an thing about Stormy Daniels, and said to talk to his lawyer.
  2. On Fox and friends he said that his lawyer Michael Cohen was defending him on this Crazy Stormy Daniels thing.
  3. Giuliani (his new lawyer) said to Hannity, that Trump had reimbursed Cohen for the Stormy.
  4. Trump tweeted this:
“Donald J. Trump
✔️
@realDonaldTrump
Mr. Cohen, an attorney, received a monthly retainer, not from the campaign and having nothing to do with the campaign, from which he entered into, through reimbursement, a private contract between two parties, known as a non-disclosure agreement, or NDA. These agreements are…”

So all these things are true?

Please.
 
Trump has more than 30,000 employees and contractors with a payroll the billions.

[Or he did before he got elected and distributed stuff to his children and others.]

It is difficult to believe he kept track of every item of expense.

Most probably other people did the actual bill-paying.
 
Not always. Sometimes, as in Scooter Libby’s case, you make a statement, they pressure somebody else to say it was incorrect, you go to jail.
It is called “a process crime”.

They ask you what time it is and if you give them the wrong answer, then “YOU LIED” … and off to prison you go.

In the case of Scooter Libby, they KNEW the truth but they maneuvered Libby into making a “false statement”.

I was exceedingly disappointed that President Bush allowed Libby to take the false hit.

Libby was prosecuted by Patrick Fitzgerald, a longtime career prosecutor, appointed to investigate the leak of the CIA officer’s identity by then-Deputy Attorney General James Comey.

Comey went on to become FBI director and was fired by Trump, a move that led to the appointment of Robert Mueller, another former FBI director whom Trump almost daily accuses of conducting a “witch hunt.”

The saga that led up to Libby’s conviction began in 2003 when Joseph Wilson, a former diplomat, wrote a New York Times op-ed column, contending that Cheney had deliberately ignored evidence showing that Iraq was not seeking to acquire material needed to build nuclear weapons.

Wilson’s claim, undercutting the justification for waging war against Iraq, was based on material he gathered in Niger for the CIA.

To undercut Wilson’s claim, administration officials told reporters that he had been sent on the fact-finding mission at the behest of his wife, Valerie Plame, who worked at the CIA.

Publication of that leak blew her cover, a potential federal crime. Libby was not charged with disclosing a CIA officer’s identity, however. Nor was the man who actually did blow Plame’s cover, former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage. But Armitage readily admitted his involvement to prosecutors and a grand jury.

Libby, however, was convicted on four counts of obstruction of justice, lying to the FBI and lying to the grand jury. He maintained that the differences between his testimony and others was just a matter of a different recollection of events.

[source: President Trump Pardons 'Scooter' Libby, Former Cheney Chief Of Staff : NPR]
 
Last edited:
They certainly can be, and there’s no particular reason other than the desire of some to say Trump lied, to think otherwise…
 
I agree. He commuted the unjust sentence, but didn’t pardon, which he should have done.
Bush refused to play politics.

And his supporters paid the price.

And Bush refused to get rid of The Mistress of Disaster … Jamie Gorelick.
 
Libby, however, was convicted on four counts of obstruction of justice, lying to the FBI and lying to the grand jury. He maintained that the differences between his testimony and others was just a matter of a different recollection of events.
@dvdjs Didn’t you tell me that misremebering wasn’t a lie but an untruth which wasn’t the same as a lie and still the FBI sent the guy to prison. You told me they don’t work like that… ???
 
@dvdjs Didn’t you tell me that misremebering wasn’t a lie but an untruth which wasn’t the same as a lie and still the FBI sent the guy to prison. You told me they don’t work like that… ???
Show me where I said that.
 
No, Monte, it was dvdjs… I was just using the quote from you because that is exactly what we were talking about–about an untruth does not equal a lie… because they remembered the facts differently and that’s exactly what the FBI got him for!!!
 
No, Monte, it was dvdjs… I was just using the quote from you because that is exactly what we were talking about–about an untruth does not equal a lie… because they remembered the facts differently and that’s exactly what the FBI got him for!!!
Are you referring to “process crimes”?

[Don’t talk to the FBI unless you can afford up to $1 million in legal fees, are indemnified for all and any losses, demand a FISA warrant, and a secure facility, of which there are very few, and use Hillary’s tactic of not remembering.]

Two or three of the current subjects of FBI questioning have opened “go fund me” pages.
 
Last edited:
While your point is valid for every day communication, I don’t think it matters when being interviewed by the FBI. Claiming you misremembered doesn’t cut it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top