Sean Hannity rails against James Comey, Hillary Clinton and “deep state crime

  • Thread starter Thread starter MonteRCMS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
7_Sorrows said:
if my husband had been director of the FBI, i would want him to respect his office and the agency and not sink so low as to partaking in petty political retributions.
Click to expand...
I notice you are keeping it quite general, whereas I asked a specific question. If he worked for the FBI and was fired by President Michael Moore for not supported a liberal agenda, you would consider going public about his firing as “partaking i petty political retributions.” Be specific and state your claim as applied to the hypothetical President Moore.

Isn’t it possible that Comey is going public because he cares about the good of the country and is not just trying to partake in petty political retributions?
 
Last edited:

Fox News - Breaking News Updates | Latest News Headlines | Photos & News Video

Breaking News, Latest News and Current News from FOXNews.com. Breaking news and video. Latest Current News: U.S., World, Entertainment, Health, Business, Technology, Politics, Sports.
insider.foxnews.com insider.foxnews.com

Alan Dershowitz on Monday slammed James Comey for leaking memos of his private discussions with President Trump.

Dershowitz, a Harvard Law professor emeritus, said the former FBI director “demeaned” the bureau by giving the memos to a law professor who then leaked the content of the memos to the New York Times.

“This is a man without courage,” Dershowitz stated on “Fox & Friends.”

He argued that Comey should have spoken up when Trump allegedly pressured him to end the FBI’s investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn, and also when the president allegedly demanded Comey’s loyalty.

“Instead, he leaked it,” Dershowitz said.
 
Last edited:
LeafByNiggle said:
40.png
7_Sorrows:
if my husband had been director of the FBI, i would want him to respect his office and the agency and not sink so low as to partaking in petty political retributions.
Click to expand...
I notice you are keeping it quite general, whereas I asked a specific question. If he worked for the FBI and was fired by President Michael Moore for not supported a liberal agenda, you would consider going public about his firing as “partaking i petty political retributions.” Be specific and state your claim as applied to the hypothetical President Moore.

Isn’t it possible that Comey is going public because he cares about the good of the country and is not just trying to partake in petty political retributions?
Click to expand...
it is pretty obvious to me James Comey is concerned more about his own ego than for the good of the country. he is self-serving and trying to score political points for the democrats and the little bit his wife divulged spoke volumes.
 
that is a good analysis! i think Jimmy would fit right in with Joy and Whoopi and make his amazing spouse happy at the same time.
 
LeafByNiggle said:
40.png
7_Sorrows:
yes, i am sure.
Click to expand...
To be clear, you would advise your husband not to say anything critical of Michael Moore if Moore were elected president. I find that hard to believe somehow.
Click to expand...
i would tell my husband “we will get through this - the two of us” without
participating in the political 3 ring circus
the democrats have going!
 
7_Sorrows said:
That is why it is called corruption.

Comey described the wrong person as being like a mob boss.

The Obamas and the Clintons are corrupt

I want my country back!
Click to expand...
I live in the U.S.A., and here we have something called a “Constitution”, and it this constitution it says one is innocent until proven guilty. Which country do you live in?
 
Metis1 said:
40.png
7_Sorrows:
That is why it is called corruption.

Comey described the wrong person as being like a mob boss.

The Obamas and the Clintons are corrupt

I want my country back!
Click to expand...
I live in the U.S.A., and here we have something called a “Constitution”, and it this constitution it says one is innocent until proven guilty. Which country do you live in?
Click to expand...
why does that not apply to President Trump?
 
Ridgerunner said:
Alternatively it might mean the DOJ was corrupt during that period. There are reasons to think so, but whether they’ll ever be investigated is unknowable at this point.
Click to expand...
See my last post. Also, how can the entire DoJ be corrupt, especially since most of the people working there are “lifers”.
 
I have not said at any point that Trump is guilty of any criminality, so why are you implying otherwise? Some here may have, I don’t know, but not I.

The hypocrisy in your post is that I supposedly was doing something that you actually did.
 
Last edited:
jagged said:
First 7 Sorrows and now you. Is this a right wing media talking point making fun of Comey’s manliness?
Click to expand...
Comey talked about Trumps appereance, the size of his hands, and put it out there that “It’s possible” regarding the pee incident dispit having no evidence. i am not attacking his manhood, i am simply making an observation about his own words and that it seemed similar to the talk you get on the view.

JAMES COMEY: He had-- impressively coifed hair, it looks to be all his. I confess, I stared at it pretty closely and my reaction was, “It most take a heck of a lot of time in the morning, but it’s impressively coifed.” He looked-- his tie was too long, as it always is. He looked slightly orange up close with small white—half moons under his eyes, which I assume are from tanning googles. And otherwise looked as I had expected him to look from tele-- as I thought he looked on television.

JAMES COMEY: Yeah. I-- I say that in my book 'cause I’m trying to be honest, 'cause that’s the truth there had been all this controversy and mocking about hand size, I can’t remember the details. But as I shook his hand I made a note to check the size and it seemed like he had average-sized hands.

JAMES COMEY: I don’t-- I don’t know. I don’t-- the nature of an investigator is you don’t believe or disbelieve. You ask, “What’s my evidence? What is the evidence that establishes me whether someone’s telling me the truth or not. And ask this allegation–” I honestly never thought this words would come out of my mouth, but I don’t know whether the-- the-- current president of the United States was with prostitutes peeing on each other in Moscow in 2013. It’s possible, but I don’t know.
 
Metis1 said:
I have not said at any point that Trump is guilty of any criminality, so why are you implying otherwise? Some here may have, I don’t know, but not I.
Click to expand...
because right now most everyone on the left believes President Trump is guilty of
probably no less than 25 things relating to business, marriage, his character, Russia, and the list goes on and on.
 
AlNg said:
40.png
niceatheist:
Serious enough that everyone involved wanted to keep his name out of it.
Click to expand...
Hannity made a bad mistake when he condemned the FBI raid on Cohen but did not reveal that he was a client of Cohen or at least getting legal advice from him. It looks like he had a possible conflict of interest.
Click to expand...
Well, it would only be a conflict of interest if Hannity was actually a journalist. Since I don’t actually think Hannity is a journalist, but rather an entertainer, I’m not sure that you can make a professional ethical complaint against him. His personal ethics, yeah, not so hot.
 
Metis1 said:
See my last post. Also, how can the entire DoJ be corrupt, especially since most of the people working there are “lifers”.
Click to expand...
I didn’t say some or all of the DOJ are guilty of anything. What I was trying to communicate, but evidently failed in doing, is that the potential is serious and should be seriously investigated. And, of course, never did I say the 'entire DOJ" is corrupt.
 
I personally don’t see how speaking lovingly about his wife could be unmanly. That’s just me. He speaks about her with love. But that means she wears the pants.

Reading things like that is surreal.
 
jagged said:
I’m sorry, all of this isn’t an indication that Comey is somehow unmanly. Just curious. And, again, it’s not his fault that there was this bizarre accusation against Trump.
Click to expand...
Perhaps the Trump fans would rather deflect to a discussion of Comey - even his manliness, than actual news about the trouble that their man is facing.
 
Last edited:
Well yes. And payments to porno actresses seem to make any weird shenanigans a bit more credible.
 
I agree with Dershowitz, though I suspect it’s a pretty venial sin. The Cohen raid was unannounced and happened very quickly. Hannity might not have known, in his own mind, whether he was a “client” or not in any meaningful sense of the word. Given his description of the conversation or conversations, he might not have been sure whether there actually was anything in Cohen’s office documenting anything related to him.

After Cohen’s office was raided, Hannity raised a fuss about it, and rightly. So did Dershowitz. But Hannity should have said something about his conversations with Cohen. He would have looked stupid if he had claimed “client” status and then nothing relating to him be found by the FBI. There really might not be anything. My guess is that there probably isnt’.

But still, overdisclosure is not a bad approach even if it might make one look overly punctilious later.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top