P
pfoos
Guest
The following commentary appeared on the Seattle News Channel’s website. The news show also airs a video version of this man’s commentaries.
Ken Schram Commentary: Putting Pedophilia On A Pedestal?
September 29, 2005
By Ken Schram
SEATTLE - It’s not about the penis.
It’s about the not-so-subtle idea of putting pedophilia on a pedestal.
When an art lover left a million dollars to the City of Seattle, it came with the stipulation that the money had to be used for a public fountain.
And the fountain had to include at least one realistic male figure.
No problem there.
The problem is what the Seattle Art Museum came up with: A nude man reaching for a nude boy.
Now, I am all in favor of artistic expression.
http://www.komotv.com/news/images/naked_art_092805.jpg I recognize that some art, by its nature, is going to offend some people.
Oh well.
But when public art becomes offensive because it has an aura of pedophilia about it, I see that as a problem.
Remember, this isn’t some sculpture that’s going to be sequestered away on the fifth floor of a museum.
It’s in a park. A public park right on the Seattle waterfront.
Esoteric museum officials can tout the work as representing the vulnerable nature of a father and son all they want.
But a naked guy reaching for a naked kid has far more sordid interpretations in this day and age.
The sculpture might as well be called the priest and the altar boy.
Now, if you think I’m wrong, just some uptight prude, let me know.
But if you think I’m right, then let the Seattle Art Museum know at webmaster@seattleartmuseum.org
*Want to share your thoughts with Ken Schram? You can e-mail him at kenschram@komo4news.com*
Ken Schram Commentary: Putting Pedophilia On A Pedestal?
September 29, 2005
By Ken Schram
SEATTLE - It’s not about the penis.
It’s about the not-so-subtle idea of putting pedophilia on a pedestal.
When an art lover left a million dollars to the City of Seattle, it came with the stipulation that the money had to be used for a public fountain.
And the fountain had to include at least one realistic male figure.
No problem there.
The problem is what the Seattle Art Museum came up with: A nude man reaching for a nude boy.
Now, I am all in favor of artistic expression.
http://www.komotv.com/news/images/naked_art_092805.jpg I recognize that some art, by its nature, is going to offend some people.
Oh well.
But when public art becomes offensive because it has an aura of pedophilia about it, I see that as a problem.
Remember, this isn’t some sculpture that’s going to be sequestered away on the fifth floor of a museum.
It’s in a park. A public park right on the Seattle waterfront.
Esoteric museum officials can tout the work as representing the vulnerable nature of a father and son all they want.
But a naked guy reaching for a naked kid has far more sordid interpretations in this day and age.
The sculpture might as well be called the priest and the altar boy.
Now, if you think I’m wrong, just some uptight prude, let me know.
But if you think I’m right, then let the Seattle Art Museum know at webmaster@seattleartmuseum.org
*Want to share your thoughts with Ken Schram? You can e-mail him at kenschram@komo4news.com*