J
jmcrae
Guest
Given the choice, I’d rather have the 8 children. Can you imagine the grandchildren you’d have?Some people are extremely productive, most of us would not be able to have 8 children and earn 2 advanced degrees.
Given the choice, I’d rather have the 8 children. Can you imagine the grandchildren you’d have?Some people are extremely productive, most of us would not be able to have 8 children and earn 2 advanced degrees.
Personally I am on the fence between having 1 child or none at all. Having any more seems like it would be far too stressful. But that’s obviously a personal preference.Given the choice, I’d rather have the 8 children. Can you imagine the grandchildren you’d have?![]()
I don’t think so. If God cares about the marital act, that’s all the more for secularists to not care.Hello! Can someone help me to compile solid reasons why contraception is immoral without mentioning God? Basically, I want to know why an atheist wouldn’t use contraception.
Kids are fun. More kids = more fun!Personally I am on the fence between having 1 child or none at all. Having any more seems like it would be far too stressful. But that’s obviously a personal preference.
For you, but this is not how everyone feels. Most people today have small families of 1-2 children, maybe 3. I can only assume that this is by choice. Before birth control or effective methods of NFP, women wouldn’t have had much of a choice. Especially since at that time women also were not treated as quite human, and so had very limited career options and likely really needed husbands for their livelihoods. Being a single woman back when women couldn’t be successful professionals, and earlier still couldn’t work in most professions would have meant a very sad existence. Being a married woman would have meant nearly constant pregnancy during the fertile years. A raw deal either way.Kids are fun. More kids = more fun!![]()
A distinct possibility.Being a married woman would have meant nearly constant pregnancy during the fertile years.
An opinion.A raw deal either way.
Yep, having lot of children just isn;t for everyone. In fact I think you could make the argument it;s not for most people. For most people I imagine that trying to care for a large family is stressful not fun.For you, but this is not how everyone feels. Most people today have small families of 1-2 children, maybe 3. I can only assume that this is by choice. Before birth control or effective methods of NFP, women wouldn’t have had much of a choice. Especially since at that time women also were not treated as quite human, and so had very limited career options and likely really needed husbands for their livelihoods. Being a single woman back when women couldn’t be successful professionals, and earlier still couldn’t work in most professions would have meant a very sad existence. Being a married woman would have meant nearly constant pregnancy during the fertile years. A raw deal either way.
There’s a surefire way not to have kids. God has only intervened once.But there was still plenty that didn;t. The main issue was the lack of any real choice.
Right, though on average those women didn’t have many children, just many pregnancies. The child mortality rate pre-vaccinations/modern medicine was so high that on average only 2 children would survive to adulthood.Course even back in those days that you speak of I am sure there were some women that enjoyed such an existance. But there was still plenty that didn;t. The main issue was the lack of any real choice.
And for most marriages having no sex would not work. I mean 25-30 years is a very long time to be married to someone and not be intimate in that way. Not to mention if I remember correctly marital rape wasn;t illegal in the USA until like the last few decades in some states. So a wife could be forced too as well.There’s a surefire way not to have kids. God has only intervened once.