D
Dr_Meinheimer
Guest
Why would they riot in 2016?
For the reasons that they did.Why would they riot in 2016?
Yes.I find it interesting that Bret Kavanaugh had no other friends he ever hung out with besides Mark Judge
Keep drinking the koolaid. It is so obvious what is happening. Of course, they are individuals, people, being used by the democrats to delay, derail, impede the nomination.7_Sorrows:![]()
If you look at these stories you will find individuals, not ™teh Democrats.The democrats trying to block the nomination
I realie that the Republican meme is that this is a coordinated effort. But the stories of how these reports developed doesn’t support that in the least. It is a phony meme.
Of course it is clear. People are coming forward with their experiences that challenge the image of Kavanaugh and his suitability to sit on the SCOTUS. Republicans are seeking to avoid an investigation minimize testimony and rush the vote before the cases - now ranging in time from 1982 to 1998 - are fuly developed understood, or more come forward.It is so obvious what is happening.
Senate probed new allegation of misconduct against Kavanaugh
It would seem an anonymous letter would be below your demonstrated standards of evidence. Just reporting the news or do you find the letter credible?The sender of the complaint described an evening involving her own daughter, Kavanaugh and several friends in 1998. “When they left the bar (under the influence of alcohol) they were all shocked when Brett Kavanaugh, shoved her friend up against the wall very aggressively and sexually.” “There were at least four witnesses including my daughter.”
As many as they need. Of course, they might be relying on Avenatti to provide them.How many more do they have lined up to
make accusations?
And you don’t find it suspicious they have waited until they are ready to vote?7_Sorrows:![]()
Of course it is clear. People are coming forward with their experiences that challenge the image of Kavanaugh and his suitability to sit on the SCOTUS. Republicans are seeking to avoid an investigation minimize testimony and rush the vote before the cases - now ranging in time from 1982 to 1998 - are fuly developed understood, or more come forward.It is so obvious what is happening.
Reporting. It is easy to understand in this climate the desire for anonymity. But there will have to be a point at which, like Ford, the witness will have to come forward for this to gain traction.It would seem an anonymous letter would be below your demonstrated standards of evidence. Just reporting the news or do you find the letter credible?
Suspisious? No Tactically smart? Yes. If the nomination imploded during the original hearings, there would be no need for opponents to come forward with this evidence, which was given in confidence. When it appeared certain that he would be voted in, some opponent or opponents with access to the information leaked it. The led other journalists to dig deeper: Ramirez was approached by the New Yorker. It emboldened others to speak out. The ensuing flood of information appears to be spontaneous, not coordinated. I don’t think a single Democratic Senator would want Avenatti in on the this.And you don’t find it suspicious they have waited until they are ready to vote?
So you approve of these tactics of smearing a man and ruining his reputation to prevent a vote on his nomination?7_Sorrows:![]()
Suspisious? No Tactically smart? Yes. If the nomination imploded during the original hearings, there would be no need for opponents to come forward with this evidence, which was given in confidence. When it appeared certain that he would be voted in, some opponent or opponents with access to the information leaked it. The led other journalists to dig deeper: Ramirez was approached by the New Yorker. It emboldened others to speak out. The ensuing flood of information appears to be spontaneous, not coordinated. I don’t think a single Democratic Senator would want Avenatti in on the this.And you don’t find it suspicious they have waited until they are ready to vote?
If they are false, no. If they are true, I am grateful that people had the courage to step forward.So you approve of these tactics of smearing a man and ruining his reputation to prevent a vote on his nomination?
Sure. Like Pizzagate. And that definitely explains Avenatti’s involvement.This IS a coordinated effort by the Dems
Seared into memory yet not remembered until a therapy session. not exactly “seared into memory” if you ask meBut the details about that night that bring me here today are ones I will never forget. They have been seared into my memory and have haunted me episodically as an adult.
Now you know how Kavanaugh and his family feel.At the same time, my greatest fears have been realized – and the reality has been far worse than what I expected. My family and I have been the target of constant harassment and death threats. I have been called the most vile and hateful names imaginable. These messages, while far fewer than the expressions of support, have been terrifying to receive and have rocked me to my core. People have posted my personal information on the internet. This has resulted in additional emails, calls, and threats.