M
mirandajb
Guest
Amen to thatI would guess the service dog will be much better behaved than many of the other people in the church.
Amen to thatI would guess the service dog will be much better behaved than many of the other people in the church.
Reminds me of a scene in an old movie (was it *Going My Way *or Bells of St. Mary’s?) where a curmudgeon finds a change of heart and goes into a church. While there, he finds man’s best friend and takes him home as a pet.Our director referred to this as a “there’s a dog in the church” situation. This refers to a loose dog that just happens to wander into the church looking for a handout or someone to pet him, etc.
I agree with the poster who said to just let Father know ahead of time that you will be coming to Mass with a service dog. That is all he needs to know but of course answer any of his questions.I guarantee that, personally. When at work, they’re as quiet as a church mouse. You can’t believe the training involved. These dogs are amazing…very, very short in supply, long waits, but soooo worth it.
If you were me, would you ask Father first, or just start bringing the dog?
IMO, other than service dogs, the only time animals should be allowed into church, regardless of who the owner is, is on the Feast of St. Francis when conditions are such that the blessing can not be held outside the church (i.e. raining).I agree with the poster who said to just let Father know ahead of time that you will be coming to Mass with a service dog. That is all he needs to know but of course answer any of his questions.
I think this is so awesome that your daughter is on the list for a service dog.
Brenda V.
I see no need to run it past a pastor - though you certainly can.Run it by your pastor…so he is aware of this and as has been posted previously the dog will probably be better behaved than some of the human parishioners. The only concern would be that the dog could be a distraction, after a couple of weeks, the dog will be a given and most likely ignored by most.
There’s only one way I can compare the two: pet allergies. To a person allergic to dogs, it wouldn’t make a difference.One cannot compare a house dog to a working dog.
I have allergies. My strategy would be simply to not shake hands with the person who has the dog (not to be rude, but I would be assuming that they had recently touched the dog) - if I were to get dog dander on my hands, I would get very sick - I don’t sneeze, but my sinuses swell up to the point where it’s difficult to breathe, and my eyes get red and itchy, which is very uncomfortable. If I don’t get to my medication in time, I can end up being quite sick for several days.There’s only one way I can compare the two: pet allergies. To a person allergic to dogs, it wouldn’t make a difference.
But even then, would being near a service dog for the duration of Mass cause a sneezing fit? I doubt it, but I’m not allergic so I don’t know how sensitive a person can be.
Heh, I suppose if someone’s that allergic, they can offer it up and move to a different pew, right?
Everyone knows this. No need to point this out EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. someone uses the term.Correction:
It is incorrect in to say “Eucharistic Minister(s)” in the context you used. By definition, the only Minister of the Eucharist is clergy: bishops, priests, and deacons. Laypeople who assist by distributing Communion are to be called “Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion”. The term " Extraordinary minister of Holy Communion" is always to be used as opposed to “Eucharistic Ministers” as stated in the Vatican document Redemptionis Sacramentum in paragraphs 154-156
You’re not pouring concrete, let me tell you.I would guess the service dog will be much better behaved than many of the other people in the church.
Using “Eucharistic Minister” as opposed to “Extra ordinary Minster of Holy Communion” is a liturgical abuse that must be politely corrected every single time.Everyone knows this. No need to point this out EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. someone uses the term.
Keep in mind that those terms are so commonly used in almost every parish in the United States that people aren’t even thinking about it when they say it.
Please remember that many of the children that are acting out in church (or public in general) in today’s world were likely to have been institutionalized a couple of decades ago because they have developmental disabilities such as autism. Parents of these children are doing their best, although at times it may not appear they are due to the child’s behavior, to train their children how to act in church (or public).You’re not pouring concrete, let me tell you.
What bugs me is the people with the SCREAMING kids who sit there like everything is fine. I don’t mean a little crying or kids being fidgety. That ties for first place the children who are loud in church (no doubt the same ones who throw the major temper tantrums in stores).
When I was in kindergarten, our teacher (who also may have been Noah’s kindergarten teacher) told us that if we fidigeted in church (moving around, swinging our legs, etc) it was because we thought we were more important than God and wanted people to pay attention to us instead of Him. I still remember it to this day, and that was at least two or three years ago (or a couple of decades, whatever). It may have sounded harsh, but guess what? We didn’t act out during Mass.
My mother went to church in the non-padded kneelers and nun-with-yardstick days, and they didn’t act out, either.
So, it’s something to think about.
I almost forgot the point of the OP. I don’t think service animals would be a problem. If you sit in the same place all the time, then people who are allergic will move around or talk to you about it.