Sex abuse in the Eastern Churches?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Myrrh23
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Lucy.

I offer my prayers for the healing of your spirit, your mind, and your body.

This is not a topic on which I ordinarily post, not because I don’t believe it to be important but because it is one regarding which I feel generally inadequate to provide comfort and solace to those who have been victims. But, your post was the first thing I read tonight after logging into the forum and I was struck by the sincerity of your words.

You have, I believe, answered your own question as well or better than anyone else can do. The Catholic Church’s handling of clerical sexual abuse can not be defended nor can the handling of similar scandals in other faiths by their respective hierarchs or leaderships. And I do not offer that last comment as a “it’s not just us” excuse - because I do not believe there is any excuse. It’s just that I strongly believe that the same factors have been at play in impeding all established ecclesia in responding to such events.

When the day is done, one fact is clear. Irrespective of the dogmatic, doctrinal, theological, spiritual, and praxis elements embodied in any religion, the principals who represent the religion to its followers - who effectively are perceived to be God’s representatives, however its faithful perceive God, are men and women - human beings. While Catholics believe, as do many other persons of faith, that their clergy, particularly their hierarchy, occupy a position of special standing in God’s sight (and, hopefully, they do), they are still - before all else - humans subject to all the vagaries, weaknesses, and illusions that plague all of the creatures with whom God has populated the earth.

Putting aside the weaknesses of character and the moral, spiritual, and mental defects that obviously afflict those who engage in such behavior, one has to look to the leadership of any given Church and wonder how it could:
  • fail to recognize that this was happening,
  • choose to not accept that it could happen,
  • respond inadequately when made aware of it,
  • deny the existence of it,
  • facilitate its ongoing continuance,
  • seek to minimize its extent at victim expense,
  • make excuses as to why it happened
  • fail to implement adequate measures to prevent recurrences.
And, yes, the Catholic Church - among others - has done all of these things.

As we both know, God has given man, including those charged with guiding His Churches, free will. Often, we only consider what that means in terms of whether it is exercised to sin or not sin. However, it also represents the capacity to exercise one’s talents to their fullest, not at all, or to any extent along the continuum between those two extremes. We see this every day, when persons acknowledged as “smart” do “stuipid” things. What does this have to do with the issue?

Consider how many individuals, committed to God’s work here on earth, are so incredibly seized with naivete that they cannot perceive of evil done by a peer in God’s service and fully imagine that anyone alleging it is somehow seeking to sabotage the work of God Himself.

Consider how many individuals in positions of authority in a Church perceive themselves obliged to assure that God’s Church not be embarrassed - as if allowing such would somehow cause God to be embarrassed.

Consider that men in positions of authority in the Church did not necessarily achieve that role because of their ability to deal with the sometimes ugly realities of the world and, faced with same, are clueless as to how to resolve them.

The answer to why and how this happened, why and how it was allowed to happen, why and how the opportunity to prevent it was allowed to slip past, why and how the opportunity to deal with it was allowed to slip past - the answer is the same. The Church may be of God, but it is comprised of men - humans - fallible, sinful, weak, humans.

Any Catholic who claims that the sin of this which rests upon so many in our Church has been overblown ought to seek out the Mystery of Penance and confess pridefulness and arrogance. That our Church has been besmirched to the extent that it has should be cautionary to all of us - the perception of the Church lies in how Catholics present themselves and their Church to the larger world. While there may be a statistically equal opportunity for one to be molested by a lifeguard, a plumber, a teacher, a television anchorperson, or an accountant, none of those are representative of a worldwide entity which portrays itself as the avenue to salvation. We are judged as what we put ourselves forth to be - and, in the case of a Church - of a Faith - the standard is raised accordingly. Persons who don’t recognize that are blind in their faith about their Faith - not anything God ever asked of us.

Many years,

Neil
 
Sure, Protestant churches do have other problems, but they don’t seem to have this one. Why us?
They have their sex scandals… they just aren’t as well publicized :rolleyes:
 
The word to use is “fornication” or “pederasty” not “sex abuse”.
 
Hey!

Have the Eastern Catholics or Eastern Orthodox had any or as much trouble with pedophile priests as the Roman Catholics have? Thanks!

Myrrh23
Yes…there is a site that catalogues a number of scandals involving Orthodox Clergy. But remember that this issue is NOT limited to Roman Catholics. It is a societal problem that crosses denominational lines (there is another site that catalogues abuses by denomination). Sorry I cannot recall each site. The Catholic Church just happens to be the elephant in the room in terms of size.

Note: This in no way absolves the Church of its mishandling of the issue.

We should all be sad when any situation happens (sex scandals to financial scandals) when it is linked to the cause of Christ regardless of denomination.

PS Here is the dealing with issues of Abuse in the Orthodox Church: pokrov.org/

RevNorth
 
THE SILENCE IS DEAFENING…

I don’t know why my question, sincerely, and I think fairly, asked has been all but ignored. Maybe because it got bumped back to a previous page

…or maybe the silence is the my answer…I have a list of answers in my own head that I do not want to believe, have been told not to believe; I think if I have worked up the courage to ask, a few could show a little courage to answer.
I am going to get…in which case I am left to draw my own conclusions…one more time, and I will bother you no more.
:nope:
I am not trying to pit one side against another, but sincerely have a question that has been on my mind a long time, but have hesitated to ask because I it is such a painful wound, and I understand why Roman Catholics swiftly rise to defend their Church, when this subject is brought up, and is completely understandable.

I believe that Christ founded the one visible Church, and provided all things needed including His presence through the Holy Spirit. Given these gifts of Grace, the Truth of Faith to be guarded and handed down, and the source of Fullness of Grace for the world; all things that should make the Church stand out as a Light to the World, that professes that it cannot teach error or fall into heresy;

On one hand are very bold claims, and to a point, True claims, of her Superior Status, yet when it comes to something as important as the care and guarding of the flock, even to the most vulnerable, She, (I won’t say makes excuses, because she does not excuse, but condemns these sins) but seems to take refuge, comfort, and justification in occupying an even playing field in this situation…that statistically She is no better or worse than any other institution or any other segment of society… as if there no difference between Her and any other institution, sacred or secular.
I have been personally affected by this heartbreaking situation, and do not ask to start any flame war.

This may get me banned, but it is one question I have wanted to ask for a long time, but have been scared to death to ask; But since I have learned and understand most of the other questions that I have had, or at least now know where the reliable sources are to find answers, I’ll risk it; and deem it worth banning to now ask it.

I think the answer must be found among those whose faith has not been shaken by these scandals and no where else…I have looked long and hard for answers and they seem are not to be found anywhere else; but since, bottom line, this is one of the main reasons I haven’t reconciled to the Roman Catholic Church, it is more important to me than any other question.

Please…I would rather have and “I don’t know”, or the an admission that the " indelible mark of the Roman Catholic Priesthood or the fact that Rome is the True Church offers absolutely no special protection or grace when it comes to the human weaknesses that all men suffer due to original sin…if this is how Roman Catholics are able to have a peace about this that I have not been able to find.

I don’t need pages and pages of cut and paste quotes of why the Roman Catholic Church is the True Church; I know all those by heart. And even if the media has been extremely hard on the Church, by everyone’s admission, the statistics seem to say that they are no better or worse than anywhere else; I’ll except that though the media spins it differently; I will give the Church the benefit of the doubt, that problems have been exaggerated and that she is no worse than any other segment of society.
To those whose faithful whose faith has not been shaken or budged on iota, nor any doubt entered their mind…please, how do you reconcile this in light of all the other claims the Church makes.
I am just looking for something to hang on to; that someday may give me the courage to make peace with this.
 
The previously stated guideline for discussion of pedophilia was so eloquently worded by the Eastern Christianity moderator that I present it here for re-iteration. Please take heed of the warning.

…I will not tolerate posts to this thread that attempt to use it as a podium to tout the idea that any Church is less or more culpable than another. There is more than adequate evidence available to suggest that the problem exists in every religious body to some extent - the numbers may vary - the tragedy remains the same. The horror of any one such instance is made no less so by a hundred elsewhere, nor is the horror of a hundred such instances cheapened by the discovery that there was one elsewhere.

More in order than finger-pointing and taking pleasure in the failings of others (“hah, you had more!” or “see, yours did it too!”) would be a rational discussion of why and how this is allowed to happen, what can be done to prevent it, and prayers for those victimized, for their families, for the families of the victimizers, and for both the victimizer and any in authority who were conscious of a victimizer’s abuse and failed to act on it in a timely and responsible manner.
Just an added note, I feel that I am following the guidelines, in both word and spirit. I have tried to word things very clearly…because I WANT an answer, a discussion…I know what the official line is, but I am asking the faithful, the people most like me, whose feelings and questions more closely reflect my own…or not.
Maybe no one questions anything, and I just lack your faith, humility and obedience.
THAT is something, if true, makes me fear for my soul, maybe is why I have waited and agonized over asking this question. I have come to the end, exhausted all my options, and may just have to face my failure…because I have really, truly have tried.
 
Just an added note, I feel that I am following the guidelines, in both word and spirit. I have tried to word things very clearly…because I WANT an answer, a discussion…I know what the official line is, but I am asking the faithful, the people most like me, whose feelings and questions more closely reflect my own…or not.
Maybe no one questions anything, and I just lack your faith, humility and obedience.
THAT is something, if true, makes me fear for my soul, maybe is why I have waited and agonized over asking this question. I have come to the end, exhausted all my options, and may just have to face my failure…because I have really, truly have tried.
Lucy,

I’m sorry that you feel your query has not yet been answered or even addressed. I certaimly thought that I had done so in my prior post to this thread.

Many years,

Neil
 
Just an added note, I feel that I am following the guidelines, in both word and spirit. I have tried to word things very clearly…because I WANT an answer, a discussion…I know what the official line is, but I am asking the faithful, the people most like me, whose feelings and questions more closely reflect my own…or not.
Maybe no one questions anything, and I just lack your faith, humility and obedience.
THAT is something, if true, makes me fear for my soul, maybe is why I have waited and agonized over asking this question. I have come to the end, exhausted all my options, and may just have to face my failure…because I have really, truly have tried.
Seriously, Lucy, your post was so long and had so many caveats and paragraphs, I cant find a question in it. I presume it has something to do with sex abuse in the Eastern Churches as that is the topic of this thread. I have looked at the links provided earlier in the thread and found them plenty edifying about abuse in the Orthodox Churches. It seems they are just dealing with some of the cases with most disciplines of clergy ocurring in the past 6 months. Besides that I am not sure what you are looking for.
 
Hey!

Have the Eastern Catholics or Eastern Orthodox had any or as much trouble with pedophile priests as the Roman Catholics have? Thanks!

Myrrh23
Seems so, but we have to put our own house in order too, not just point out the sins of others.

Source.

Doesn’t matter who’s doing it, that it is being done at-all is a disgrace.
 
** Irish Melkite and surgei,**

Thank you for the time and patience and for sharing your thoughts, you were the were the only one brave enough to tackle it. Everyone else seemed to run for the hills. This thread sat dead for 2 days (yet there is nearly a thousand views)…pretty impressive for one of the subjects that make for the hottest threads in any section of the forum.

It only picked up when my post was no longer on the current page and then the same old arguments and counter arguments started flying.

** XtusVictor,**:confused:

my fault for not stating that last post was an not the main post, but I wanted to make sure that I wasn’t breaking forum rules, and just pushing the question.:ehh:
If you read my post before it, my original question is there. Yes I know it’s long, and people prefer rapid fire debate…

**so here is the condensed version, which is going to sound a lot more polemic.
**
This is not only about the Eastern Catholic Church, but the entire Roman Catholic Church. The Catholic Church claims to be the one and only true Church…cannot err, never will fail, and is the only one who can make any claims on the promises that Christ made to the church.
In every way she is superior, blessed, full of Grace, the chosen one, all Salvation comes through her.
Given these claims, which I don’t dispute, why is it that she is all those things, no other even comes close to the high place she occupies, yet when it comes to the sex abuse scandal, all bets are off…she can defend herself by pointing to statistics that she is no better or worse than any other organization sacred or secular, or any segment of society.
And cries foul when people. media “unfairly” pick on her.

Why is the playing field all the sudden equal when it comes to this?

I wanted to know how the average Faithful Catholic reconciled without if affecting their faith, their trust, or if it did affect it, but just didn’t talk about it. I know more than 2 people have given it a passing thought…and everybody has an opinion, but no one wants to tell me why it’s ok to claim parity in this horrible crime against the most vulnerable of the flock.

I know the church is not sin free, but when there is no difference between christian,non-christian, true church and non christian, or heretical or schismatic churches, and this is even admitted by the Church, as if it makes it OK, or at should exempt them from any more fierce scrutiny or condemnation than one would any other institution.

Does being the one True Church, the fount of all Salvation and Grace make you even a little better? Does Grace and Salvation change anything at all? And why is that acceptable?
Am I the only one asking? Or am I just another (sub-conscience) Catholic Basher.

(read the full pos back from a couple days ago-I have a very personal stake in this, it’s not all hypothetical)
 
I still don’t know what to say luc.
I’m sorry.
It hurts. It stinks.
All I can do is hold on to the faith I received. That is, I can only keep in mind that the suffering of this life is nothing in comparison to the true life that is yet to come. Reading a Papal paper the other day I noticed a literary rule and realized joy and suffering are the same. It is Light and Glory that are their oposites. Joy when it comes is for here. Suffering when it comes is for here. What will be left for eternity is so great that it can be spoken of as only Light or Glory because all else is meaningless before it.
God bless you.
 
** Irish Melkite and surgei,**

Thank you for the time and patience and for sharing your thoughts, you were the were the only one brave enough to tackle it. Everyone else seemed to run for the hills. This thread sat dead for 2 days (yet there is nearly a thousand views)…pretty impressive for one of the subjects that make for the hottest threads in any section of the forum.

It only picked up when my post was no longer on the current page and then the same old arguments and counter arguments started flying.

** XtusVictor,**:confused:

my fault for not stating that last post was an not the main post, but I wanted to make sure that I wasn’t breaking forum rules, and just pushing the question.:ehh:
If you read my post before it, my original question is there. Yes I know it’s long, and people prefer rapid fire debate…

**so here is the condensed version, which is going to sound a lot more polemic.
**
This is not only about the Eastern Catholic Church, but the entire Roman Catholic Church. The Catholic Church claims to be the one and only true Church…cannot err, never will fail, and is the only one who can make any claims on the promises that Christ made to the church.
In every way she is superior, blessed, full of Grace, the chosen one, all Salvation comes through her.
Given these claims, which I don’t dispute, why is it that she is all those things, no other even comes close to the high place she occupies, yet when it comes to the sex abuse scandal, all bets are off…she can defend herself by pointing to statistics that she is no better or worse than any other organization sacred or secular, or any segment of society.
And cries foul when people. media “unfairly” pick on her.

Why is the playing field all the sudden equal when it comes to this?

I wanted to know how the average Faithful Catholic reconciled without if affecting their faith, their trust, or if it did affect it, but just didn’t talk about it. I know more than 2 people have given it a passing thought…and everybody has an opinion, but no one wants to tell me why it’s ok to claim parity in this horrible crime against the most vulnerable of the flock.

I know the church is not sin free, but when there is no difference between christian,non-christian, true church and non christian, or heretical or schismatic churches, and this is even admitted by the Church, as if it makes it OK, or at should exempt them from any more fierce scrutiny or condemnation than one would any other institution.

Does being the one True Church, the fount of all Salvation and Grace make you even a little better? Does Grace and Salvation change anything at all? And why is that acceptable?
Am I the only one asking? Or am I just another (sub-conscience) Catholic Basher.

(read the full pos back from a couple days ago-I have a very personal stake in this, it’s not all hypothetical)
I read what you write and I have much empathy and sympathy for this issue.

What you may not be asking, but what your post almost begins to plea for, is an empiracle demonstration that by being the fullness of the faith and being Holy the Church should suffer the stain of these sins & scandals less as She is holy. Less, being comparative.

Frankly, that is hard to demonstrate.
I know the church is not sin free, but when there is no difference between christian,non-christian, true church and non christian, or heretical or schismatic churches, and this is even admitted by the Church, as if it makes it OK, or at should exempt them from any more fierce scrutiny or condemnation than one would any other institution.
I don’t know that we know there is no difference. I don’t know that it is fair to measure “worst common denominators” as a litmus either. They valleys may be equally deep, are the mountain tips equally high?

It may be better still to look at the levels of sanctity achieved and the great holiness of the saints. From there, however, I still would not invite “us/them” comparisons.

I will keep you in my prayers today at Liturgy. Please do the same for me.
 
As to “How most cope” it is rather simple:

**almost no one is molested.
**

The few who are are traumatized, yes. They are not the majority, nor are the molesters the majority of priests.

Most Catholics won’t and haven’t experienced such, no matter the rite. Nor have most orthodox, nor most protestants.

And the current stupid allowance for prosecution without physical evidence more than a decade on…
 
As to “How most cope” it is rather simple:

almost no one is molested.

The few who are are traumatized, yes. They are not the majority, nor are the molesters the majority of priests.

Most Catholics won’t and haven’t experienced such, no matter the rite. Nor have most orthodox, nor most protestants.

And the current stupid allowance for prosecution without physical evidence more than a decade on…
I wish that you had finished your thought, I want to know what the average Catholic thinks, I can’t navigate a path that is totally dark, and I ask not to condemn, fight, or get take out my feelings, but my words sometimes may sound harsh; Please forgive me in advance

This is not just to you, but just some of my thoughts in general.
First thank you for your honesty and effort to answe.

…as for no physical evidence, if you want pictures, witnesses, ER reports, sperm swabs, and DNA identification, in most cases it doesn’t exist…it’s just the nature of the animal.
But THERE IS PHYSICAL EVIDENCE in this type of crime…the the abuser and the abused. In fact, you are talking to physical evidence right now.

I am not sure I agree that this is not personal for the majority. It may not top 51%, but most people I talk knows someone, who has been affected, but knowing and actually being willing to enter into what the experience is like is something else.

Just a legal note: most states are working to remove the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse…and it is the right thing to do, it’s a form of murder, soul murder.

YOU NEVER GET YOUR LIFE BACK, and study after study supports this. Even if the person is under spiritual care,and even goes through a process of acceptance and forgiveness, there has been an ontological change in the person.

Church teaching on sexual intercourse teaches that it creates an attachment, a permanant effect.

In Marriage, you become one flesh, and the bond in can never be dissolved.

In an act of fornication, Paul says the Christian is committing joins a member of Christ’s body to a harlot…
How can Catholic teaching deny the sexual act between an adult an a child, who has been deprived or the dignity of consent, does not have some similar ontological effect…

Either it is true always, or it’s not true at all.
You can’t have it both ways.

I really do appreciate your candidness.
I wish more people would be give honest, uncensored answers…
Their empathy may be sincere, but any trust is destroyed if they harbor suspicians that a good portion of us are liars and out for a quick buck.
God knows the Bishops and priests get the benefit of the doubt, though many have proved over and over they don’t deserve it, Can’t that same generosity of trust be extended to those who claim to be victims?

I am be banned for this post, but so be it

I think I have said enough, and it might be best to just bow out.

But it might be a good idea, as the moderator suggested, to discuss this, not to find ways to explain, justify or place blame…but maybe honestly ask yourselves if what you say to victims, if what Bishops say to victims, they are saying it because they believe it, or it’s what they should say, must say. And does it match what you truly think in your heart of hearts.

I have no reason to doubt anything anyone has said to me on this thread, and again thank you for your honest concern and thoughtful answers.

But a word of caution to anyone who may have contact with a victim in person or on a forum:, don’t ever say something that you don’t wholeheartedly believe, just because you think it’s the right thing to say, or what we want to hear.

For our very survival we have learned to be extremely accurate readers of people, and there is nothing that is more threatning to us and faith destroying than to have someone tell us one thing, and but believe another…most of the time we can sense the dissonance, or careless words, or actions will soon give your real feelings away.
We are expert wall builders, another survival technique we honed.
Trust doesn’t come easy, in fact, it breaks my heart to admit, trust rarely comes at all, and if it does, it is as more fragile than I have words to express.

By God’s Grace I am learning to trust little by little, but only after about thirty years of trying. I won’t let this rob me of Christ…that’s why I am asking these questions.
It is nearly impossible to be a member of the Church and to be asked to trust without question, nearly, but God does everything to find and bring back the one. 99 is not good enough for Him, He wants us all safe in the fold, and He has been gracious to me.

For a believer and member of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, who wants nothing more than to stay that in it, you can imagine what a precarious path I walk.
 
Dear Lucy,

I have watched the discussion since the beginning of this thread. Perhaps I have no right to enter the dialog. As you know, the Orthodox Church makes similar claims of superiority to the benighted ‘heterodox’. I have asked similar questions to yours but in an Orthodox context. Why did bishops lie, move predators around, silence victims, and marginalize and treat victims like collateral damage or yesterday’s garbage? Dig into the www.pokrov.org site, it’s a real stomach turner. A previous poster suggested that what happened in Catholic parishes just couldn’t happen in Orthodox parishes, Our experience and that of the Pokrov mother’s is quite different. (Just ask them.) Silent clergy, cowed laity, and indifferent bishops … sound familiar?

The worst of it is that almost all Orthodox Christian people can obsess about is the alleged predator and the threatened $$$. If they give a victim/survivor a second thought it is that victims are whiners, gold diggers and an embarrassment to the Good Name of the Church. Judging by their actions, they want us and our children to disappear. Period. Do they see the pain? You’d never know it by their silence. Can they imagine the pain? I dunno. Do they thank God that they and/or their children don’t have to go through this nightmare? Damn straight they do. Do they care whether we ever attend Liturgy again? Again the silence is deafening.

I too am tired of the minimizing and discounting of victims and survivors. My wife, a lifelong Roman Catholic, says its no different in her church. We have made the choice to attend regular SNAP meetings. www.snapnetwork.org I hesitate to give advice, but SNAP members do understand the pain. They were nearly the only ones that stuck by us after our son’s abuse and depression. Some victims don’t survive. Our son committed suicide in March '07. That’s how deadly serious this abomination is, that has affected our churches.

My wife suggested this article. Most here won’t like it, but it’s another perspective about the problem, with a Roman Catholic context:

reform-network.net/?p=1241

I do hope you find answers. I too have kept my faith in Christ, but it’s an awful feeling to have your trust in Church authority shattered. We too are trying to find our way.

in XC,
J
 
Dear Lucy,

I have watched the discussion since the beginning of this thread. Perhaps I have no right to enter the dialog. As you know, the Orthodox Church makes similar claims of superiority to the benighted ‘heterodox’. I have asked similar questions to yours but in an Orthodox context. Why did bishops lie, move predators around, silence victims, and marginalize and treat victims like collateral damage or yesterday’s garbage? Dig into the www.pokrov.org site, it’s a real stomach turner. A previous poster suggested that what happened in Catholic parishes just couldn’t happen in Orthodox parishes, Our experience and that of the Pokrov mother’s is quite different. (Just ask them.) Silent clergy, cowed laity, and indifferent bishops … sound familiar?

The worst of it is that almost all Orthodox Christian people can obsess about is the alleged predator and the threatened $$$. If they give a victim/survivor a second thought it is that victims are whiners, gold diggers and an embarrassment to the Good Name of the Church. Judging by their actions, they want us and our children to disappear. Period. Do they see the pain? You’d never know it by their silence. Can they imagine the pain? I dunno. Do they thank God that they and/or their children don’t have to go through this nightmare? Damn straight they do. Do they care whether we ever attend Liturgy again? Again the silence is deafening.

I too am tired of the minimizing and discounting of victims and survivors. My wife, a lifelong Roman Catholic, says its no different in her church. We have made the choice to attend regular SNAP meetings. www.snapnetwork.org I hesitate to give advice, but SNAP members do understand the pain. They were nearly the only ones that stuck by us after our son’s abuse and depression. Some victims don’t survive. Our son committed suicide in March '07. That’s how deadly serious this abomination is, that has affected our churches.

My wife suggested this article. Most here won’t like it, but it’s another perspective about the problem, with a Roman Catholic context:

reform-network.net/?p=1241

I do hope you find answers. I too have kept my faith in Christ, but it’s an awful feeling to have your trust in Church authority shattered. We too are trying to find our way.

in XC,
J
I have been reading CAF for tone and have been terribly unimpressed with the triumphalism and self righteousness on all sides until I read your post.

Thank you. God Bless and Merry Christmas.
 
Hi Lucy,

I am an “average Catholic” so I’ll probably not give you a better than average answer to your questions.
:o
The Catholic Church claims to be the one and only true Church…cannot err, never will fail, and is the only one who can make any claims on the promises that Christ made to the church.

My first reaction/explanation to this is that it is in the teachings of the Church that the gates of hell will not prevail.

In every way she is superior, blessed, full of Grace, the chosen one, all Salvation comes through her.
Given these claims . . . why is it when it comes to the sex abuse scandal, all bets are off…she can defend herself by pointing to statistics that she is no better or worse than any other organization sacred or secular, or any segment of society.

*The priests, bishops, cardinals et al are all human beings subject to sin the same as everyone else in the world. Yes, they have chosen a vocation to Christ, but so did Judas. The Church is all those things you stated **despite ***the sinful humans who make up the Church.

And cries foul when people. media “unfairly” pick on her.

Yes, the media does like to point out the failings of the Church in this and in other topics. The Church’s consistent teachings on marriage/divorce, birth-control, homosexuality, abortion etc are contrary to what is going on in our sex-saturated society. The Church is a threat to all these things which have become a common way of life.

Why is the playing field all the sudden equal when it comes to this?

Because everyone playing is human and subject to sin.

I wanted to know how the average Faithful Catholic reconciled without if affecting their faith, their trust . . . I know more than 2 people have given it a passing thought…and everybody has an opinion, but no one wants to tell me why it’s ok to claim parity in this horrible crime against the most vulnerable of the flock.

The Catholic Church has the fullness of Truth. I can’t walk away from that because some members (myself included) have not been perfect. Perhaps if I had known anyone personally who was molested by a priest or knew a priest that was accused my trust would be more shaken. And maybe that’s the way it is with most Catholics. I mean, I don’t even know of a friend of a friend for example.

I realize that just because I don’t know of these things personally that they haven’t happened, but maybe that is a factor as well. I do know three people who were molested (by their family members) so I do understand how awful it is for the child (and I know in no way did I come close to expressing how truely horrible it was/is from the previous sentence.)

I think that the idea of “parity” is just to show people that it is not only a Catholic Church problem (which we certainly didn’t get from the media). Not so much to point a finger at other churches/instituitions but to say this is a problem with society (humanity) as a whole so much so that it infects every walk of life.


I know the church is not sin free, but when there is no difference between christian,non-christian, true church and non christian, or heretical or schismatic churches, and this is even admitted by the Church, as if it makes it OK, or at should exempt them from any more fierce scrutiny or condemnation than one would any other institution.

I don’t think the Church or anyone in the Church thinks its OK! Yes, we are called to be salt and light to the world. I think the Church is getting more scrutiny than other institutions because of Her position on sexual sins in particular. Some of Her members have not lived up to the ideal of Her teachings in that respect.

Does being the one True Church, the fount of all Salvation and Grace make you even a little better? Does Grace and Salvation change anything at all? And why is that acceptable?
Am I the only one asking? Or am I just another (sub-conscience) Catholic Basher.

*The Truth and Grace are there but one has to accept them, repent and ammend their lives. *

(read the full pos back from a couple days ago-I have a very personal stake in this, it’s not all hypothetical)
I hope I was able to make some sense for you. I wanted to try and answer some of your questions, and for you to know that you’re not being ignored.

A Blessed and Holy Christmas to you!
 
A reasonable requirement for prosecution is verfiability.

Me, I have a reasonable doubt, the requisite standard for criminal trials, if there is no physical (non-testimonial) evidence. Many sexual abuse cases DO have physical evidence. And those usually go forth to trial or the offender takes a plea.

The problem is that most of the so-called abused lack any verifiability of their claims, but have lawyers who know that a quick and quiet settlement will pay their own house-payments for a year.

You get a lot of “supressed memory” issues. Recent studies have shown suppressed memory to be quite unreliable even when physical evidence has been retained. The problem is the nature of human memory and traumatic event memory. Locally, a guy sued hs father for childhood sexual abuse. Even had physical evidence he’d preserved for years. Swore up and down it was his dad. Right up until trial. The DNA showed it to be someone else (an uncle, as I recall). Case got aquitted.

eyewitnesses are EXTREMELY unreliable, scientifically. Study after study has shown this.

Now, people are coming forward after 20+ years, and claiming abuses, abuses which can not be proven scientifically, and which were often never reported at the time. I can see a 30 year old case where the police report was taken but never acted upon being sued over… but then sue the right people: the offender and the police, and the DA.

If the bishop had numerous reports, and hid the offender, he should be retired to a monastery, along with those he hid after they serve their jail time.

The problem is that many of the so called abuse victims are winning by settlement with nothing more than an allegation that has no face value.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top