"Sex forms a permanent bond between two individuals"

  • Thread starter Thread starter DarkLight
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

DarkLight

Guest
That’s always what I was taught anyways - that sex formed a permanent physical and emotional bond between two people. And that was why it was so important to stay chaste, so you could save that bond for just one person.

The trouble comes for people like me whose first sexual experiences were, shall we say, less than consensual. It can be hard to understand the importance of sex in a proper marriage when it seems like there’s already a bond from prior experiences. And yet, I don’t really know how else to explain sex being sacred and special, really.

Any advice/guidance on this matter?
 
The only advice I have is to pray to God to break the soul tie

Angie
 
I’m sorry but rape is an act of violence. There is no way there is any sort of ‘soul tie’ between a rapist and a victim.

I think what you were taught isn’t necessarily accurate. Sure, sex brings you closer to another person when it’s consensual but in my experience sharing daily life with another person who knows you inside out is more binding.

Sex should be reserved for marriage because its purpose is unity and procreation both. Marriage protects the sacredness of being able to be a part of God creating new humans while simultaneously protecting the family unit and hence ensuring that the child is well looked after.
Sex isolated from marriage is more likely to be based on lust.
 
I would add that it is the voluntary vulnerability and bearing of oneself in front of another person combined with the positive hormones that make sex a bonding experience. By that same logic, rape is made exactly the opposite of a bonding experience.
 
Well, that phrase is a bit too absolute. Healing that fixes the damage after non-consensual sex can be obtained with the right circumstances.

The chemical events that occur in the brain certainly bond two people who have sex, but if that was in a non-consensual situation, it is less of a bond and more of an injury. It is not necessarily impossible for you to form a true bond with a future spouse, but it may just be a bit more painful in the process towards healing.

I’m not a professional in this matter, and anyone who really has wounds to heal should see one to work through any issues they may have. The only advice I can give is to pray and offer up your sufferings to Christ.
 
Did you willingly defy God’s commandments? Did you both know of this “bond” and fully intend to form it? Did you confess with contrition and receive absolution? Then maintain your contrite heart and move on. If you received absolution, the guilt is gone. What you may do for the rest of your life is mourn your behavior. And, as we know, blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted.
 
That’s always what I was taught anyways - that sex formed a permanent physical and emotional bond between two people. And that was why it was so important to stay chaste, so you could save that bond for just one person.

The trouble comes for people like me whose first sexual experiences were, shall we say, less than consensual. It can be hard to understand the importance of sex in a proper marriage when it seems like there’s already a bond from prior experiences. And yet, I don’t really know how else to explain sex being sacred and special, really.

Any advice/guidance on this matter?
It’s not actually true that sex “forms a permanent bond between two individuals”.
I think there is this idea that is promoted by some chastity speakers that once you have sex with a person you are somehow permanently attached to that person on some level. Yes, sex is special and sacred in marriage, and there is an aspect that allows the husband and wife to bond and become closer to each other. However the bond needs to be renewed and maintained and reinforced through continual acts of love, many of them non-sexual.
There does need to be healing that takes place if someone has a sexual experience that is either non-consensual or prior to marriage with a person who is not your spouse. However it is entirely possible to be healed of those things through prayer and grace, and indeed, discussing it with your spouse.
Any other attitude leads to the false idea that a person is “damaged goods” if they have sex before marriage.

Yes, there is a bond, but it’s not some magical unbreakable bond that leaves a person scarred if they don’t have their first sexual experience on their wedding night.
 
I do think it’s true that our past experiences, whatever they are, will have some impact on us in the present and the future. Those experiences, good or bad, shape us into the people we are.

I had sexual experiences, consensual and non, prior to marriage. I’ve been through therapy and confession, and have been living chastely in marriage for many years. Still, though, occasionally I’ll have a weird dream, or my brain will suddenly bring to mind something that happened years ago. I’ll probably have to deal with that in some way or another for the rest of my life. But I don’t think that I’m “ruined” or that I’m permanently bonded to those people. I have memories of other things too that aren’t part of my experience now (anyone else get flashbacks of the really, really stupid things you’ve said when you were in middle school? I wouldn’t mind if those went away! 😊 :p) I still may feel a twinge of regret or embarrassment, but I can shake it off.
 
Rape is not a sex act no matter how often demented people try to make it into one. Rape and other forms of sexual abuse are violence to the extreme and extremely damaging in ways no other acts of violence are. Praying for your healing.
 
I would add that it is the voluntary vulnerability and bearing of oneself in front of another person combined with the positive hormones that make sex a bonding experience. By that same logic, rape is made exactly the opposite of a bonding experience.
That is exactly why I recommended praying to God to break the soul tie. Soul ties are meant to be a positive thing, but they can be negative. We need to break the negative ones
 
That’s always what I was taught anyways -** that sex formed a permanent physical and emotional bond between two people. **And that was why it was so important to stay chaste, so you could save that bond for just one person.

The trouble comes for people like me whose first sexual experiences were, shall we say, less than consensual. It can be hard to understand the importance of sex in a proper marriage when it seems like there’s already a bond from prior experiences. And yet, I don’t really know how else to explain sex being sacred and special, really.

Any advice/guidance on this matter?
Mostly just that this view isn’t Catholic teaching. I think that this view grew up as a way of “building a fence” around chastity to protect it, but it’s really gotten out of hand

Really, is there an unbreakable permanent bond formed between a serial rapist and all of their victims? Blech. Or, let’s say a permanent bond between a subway groper and his victims? Not very likely. Or a flasher and the people he flashes?

I’d suggest reading the Catechism on marriage and sex instead and see if some good ideas don’t flush out the bad ones.
 
If you are thinking in terms of a new age type of karmic bond, this does not exist in the way you are thinking of. As Bitterhope said, rape is not a sex act.

There are influences, anger, etc., that can be passed on, but these can be negated through prayer, such as deliverance prayers. Asking for the intercession of our Lord through his Mother can work to dissolve this.

Pray the Rosary, say prayers, and if you are Catholic, go to confession and Communion.
 
It’s not actually true that sex “forms a permanent bond between two individuals”.
I think there is this idea that is promoted by some chastity speakers that once you have sex with a person you are somehow permanently attached to that person on some level. Yes, sex is special and sacred in marriage, and there is an aspect that allows the husband and wife to bond and become closer to each other. However the bond needs to be renewed and maintained and reinforced through continual acts of love, many of them non-sexual.
There does need to be healing that takes place if someone has a sexual experience that is either non-consensual or prior to marriage with a person who is not your spouse. However it is entirely possible to be healed of those things through prayer and grace, and indeed, discussing it with your spouse.
Any other attitude leads to the false idea that a person is “damaged goods” if they have sex before marriage.

Yes, there is a bond, but it’s not some magical unbreakable bond that leaves a person scarred if they don’t have their first sexual experience on their wedding night.
By the way, y’all are adorable!!!

Love the new photo!
 
Did you willingly defy God’s commandments? Did you both know of this “bond” and fully intend to form it? Did you confess with contrition and receive absolution? Then maintain your contrite heart and move on. If you received absolution, the guilt is gone. What you may do for the rest of your life is mourn your behavior. And, as we know, blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted.
Setting aside the question of whether a victim of rape has anything to be contrite about, I do have to question the wisdom of meditating on past sexual sins.

A priest we used to know cited some old spiritual advice (I do not know from where) saying that while it is an excellent thing to meditate on past sins in general, it is a very bad idea to meditate on past sexual sin.

And you can see why–the “repentant” meditation on past sexual sin could become an occasion for new sexual sin.

So, the less one thinks about past unchastity, the better.

(And, on reflection, I think the same advice probably applies to any sort of addictive, habit-forming activity.)

But, again, this is just an aside, not relevant to the OP.
 
Rape is not a sex act no matter how often demented people try to make it into one. Rape and other forms of sexual abuse are violence to the extreme and extremely damaging in ways no other acts of violence are. Praying for your healing.
Exactly. Nobody says they have a “financial relationship” with the guy who robbed them, nor do they even consider the person they had to fire for embezzlement a “business associate.”

The concept of setting up a permanent relationship by sexual consort comes from passages like this:

*Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take Christ’s members and make them the members of a prostitute? Of course not! Do you not know that anyone who joins himself to a prostitute becomes one body with her? For “the two,” it says, “will become one flesh.” But whoever is joined to the Lord becomes one spirit with him.

Avoid immorality. Every other sin a person commits is outside the body, but the immoral person sins against his own body. Do you not know that your body is a temple of the holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God, and that you are not your own? For you have been purchased at a price. Therefore, glorify God in your body.* 1 Cor. 6:15-20

We are to be chaste not because we become spiritually married to everyone with whom we engage in sex. We are to be chaste because we belong to the Holy Spirit and violate our relationship with God when we sin against our bodies in this way, because our bodies are rightfully the dwelling place of the Holy Spirit.

That is why St. Paul also said:
Now the works of the flesh are obvious: immorality, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery, hatreds, rivalry, jealousy, outbursts of fury, acts of selfishness, dissensions, factions, occasions of envy, drinking bouts, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.
Gal. 5:19-20

It is a mistake to think of a sinful sexual history as being uniquely damaging to future prospects of marriage. If you have an attachment to self-centeredness, greed, pride, sloth, or any of the capital sins, that is going to make the married life more difficult to live fruitfully as surely as a past history of indulging in the works of lust. The temporal effect of sin–both yours and the sins of others–is going to make it more difficult to give of yourself fully.

To have been victimized, however, is a work of healing that becomes your spouse’s work to do just as surely as it is yours. If you think about it, you will willingly take on these things in your spouse, correct? If he is the child of alcoholics, he will no longer have to take that on alone, but will have you to help him.

If he comes into your married life with debt or lacking any savings, you will carry that together without regard for who is to blame for it. If he is fighting a past habit of sloth of the effects of poor choices in friends, you will face that together. If he has had a crippling injury, you will make the best of that together and will win the merit of coping with it and even profiting from the trial together.
 
Exactly. Nobody says they have a “financial relationship” with the guy who robbed them, nor do they even consider the person they had to fire for embezzlement a “business associate.”

The concept of setting up a permanent relationship by sexual consort comes from passages like this:

Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take Christ’s members and make them the members of a prostitute? Of course not! Do you not know that anyone who joins himself to a prostitute becomes one body with her? For “the two,” it says, “will become one flesh.” But whoever is joined to the Lord becomes one spirit with him.

Avoid immorality. Every other sin a person commits is outside the body, but the immoral person sins against his own body. Do you not know that your body is a temple of the holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God, and that you are not your own? For you have been purchased at a price. Therefore, glorify God in your body. 1 Cor. 6:15-20

We are to be chaste not because we become spiritually married to everyone with whom we engage in sex. We are to be chaste because we belong to the Holy Spirit and violate our relationship with God when we sin against our bodies in this way, because our bodies are rightfully the dwelling place of the Holy Spirit.

That is why St. Paul also said:
Now the works of the flesh are obvious: immorality, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery, hatreds, rivalry, jealousy, outbursts of fury, acts of selfishness, dissensions, factions, occasions of envy, drinking bouts, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.
Gal. 5:19-20
The sentence in bold would also imply that whoever has previously sinned and then repented and joined themselves to Christ is therefore healed, or capable of being healed.
 
It’s not actually true that sex “forms a permanent bond between two individuals”.
I think there is this idea that is promoted by some chastity speakers that once you have sex with a person you are somehow permanently attached to that person on some level.
That’s definitely the message we got - that the importance of sex was being able to fully give yourself to your husband. And if you’d been intimate with another man you couldn’t fully give yourself because you’d already given part of it away. I remember an example in one book (I think it was I Kissed Dating Goodbye, but I’m not sure) of a girl on her wedding, but all her exes were coming up too because the guy couldn’t just marry her, he was taking on all her exes that she had been intimate with as well.
*Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take Christ’s members and make them the members of a prostitute? Of course not! Do you not know that anyone who joins himself to a prostitute becomes one body with her? For “the two,” it says, “will become one flesh.” But whoever is joined to the Lord becomes one spirit with him.

Avoid immorality. Every other sin a person commits is outside the body, but the immoral person sins against his own body. Do you not know that your body is a temple of the holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God, and that you are not your own? For you have been purchased at a price. Therefore, glorify God in your body.* 1 Cor. 6:15-20
That’s definitely the verses we were taught - that the Bible said anyone you had one sex with, you were becoming one flesh with and that was binding in God’s eyes.
 
That’s definitely the message we got - that the importance of sex was being able to fully give yourself to your husband. And if you’d been intimate with another man you couldn’t fully give yourself because you’d already given part of it away. I remember an example in one book (I think it was I Kissed Dating Goodbye, but I’m not sure) of a girl on her wedding, but all her exes were coming up too because the guy couldn’t just marry her, he was taking on all her exes that she had been intimate with as well.

That’s definitely the verses we were taught - that the Bible said anyone you had one sex with, you were becoming one flesh with and that was binding in God’s eyes.
Did the line include the banker that held the bride’s student loans? The judge that sentenced the groom for a DUII? The employer that helped them earn a steady paycheck? The parents who gave them their internal self-talk? The priests who helped them believe (or didn’t help them believe) in God’s mercy?
 
That’s definitely the message we got - that the importance of sex was being able to fully give yourself to your husband. And if you’d been intimate with another man you couldn’t fully give yourself because you’d already given part of it away. I remember an example in one book (I think it was I Kissed Dating Goodbye, but I’m not sure) of a girl on her wedding, but all her exes were coming up too because the guy couldn’t just marry her, he was taking on all her exes that she had been intimate with as well.

That’s definitely the verses we were taught - that the Bible said anyone you had one sex with, you were becoming one flesh with and that was binding in God’s eyes.
I guess marrying as a widow or widower is out then…
 
I guess marrying as a widow or widower is out then…
It is interesting to think, isn’t it, that someone might be put off by a past relationship that was not off-putting to the Holy Spirit even as it was going on? If the relationship was pleasing to God, so much so that He made it a source of grace, who are we to say that even the knowledge of it is displeasing to us?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top