“… because his church told him so … hence, I don’t want any of it”
Mr. Estimable, I wanted to chime in along this line, that you should make a clear distinction between what the Catholic Church advised you through its priests and deacons, and what you chose to do by disregarding that advice. At least you should make this clear to your children if it ever comes up in a discussion, lest they get a false impression about what the Church teaches about marriage as ordained by God, and they risk becoming bitter, marriage-hating, God-hating atheists and anti-Catholics. Fact is that the Church advised you that your marriage is likely not valid and the Church authoritatively teaches, through its teaching ministry entrusted by Jesus Christ and guaranteed by the Holy Spirit, that it is not God’s will that one should stay in an invalid or null marriage. You simply cannot imply that you are following God’s will as outlined in the teachings of the Church, and if you don’t make this clear to your children, you risk misleading them. Of course the Church did not make a determination through its Marriage Tribunal, but it cannot make a determination unless you ask for that. This situation is a little bit like the doctor advising a man based on his high blood levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or advising a woman based on a lump in her breast, to get tested for possible cancer. The patient can always refuse to get further testing, it is his/her decision.
When it comes to the teachings of our Church, we are best off checking out the Catechism, and if we disagree with what’s said there, it essentially comes down to “the Church teaches so and so about marriage, and the Church believes that it teaches the will of God authoritatively and without error, but I disagree with its teachings and I believe that I know better”.
I say this because I noticed a number of disagreements between the teachings of our Church and your opinions, Mr. Estimable. First, the Church does not teach that it is always sinful to separate and/or get a civil divorce, in fact it teaches that separation and/or divorce may be necessary in certain circumstances. This is the general teaching and it does not give a yes or no answer to your specific case. Mr. Estimable, do you believe what the Church teaches through its Catechism and Magisterium? Second, nowhere does the Church teach that one should stay in an invalid marriage. Also, it does not give any promises that staying under one roof with someone who is not validly married to us, we will facilitate the salvation of said person. True, Our Blessed Mother said at Fatima, and Jesus said to St. Faustina, that we should pray for sinners and for unbelievers. But that’s not the same thing as staying under the same roof with someone who is not validly married to us. I am speaking here in general terms, not trying to prejudge your particular case after your deacon suggested that you have grounds for a declaration of nullity, but an actual determination by a Church Tribunal was not made.
If you refuse to find out whether your marriage is valid or not, after it was indicated by priests and deacons of the Church that it is possibly invalid, then you are on your own, making up and following your own rules apart from what the Church teaches. You might be suffering unnecessarily and the Church offered to help you, but you don’t want to be helped. Again, you may disagree with the Church, you may believe that the Church is in error when it says that you have no obligation whatsoever to stay in an invalid marriage, you may believe that you know God’s will better than the Church does, but I think you should acknowledge that you are in disagreement with the Church’s teachings at this point. Of course, there’s no determination of the validity of your marriage at this point, but this is because you chose not to find out the truth, much like a patient who gets a lab result of high PSA, and then refuses to follow up and find out whether he has early stage curable prostate cancer, advanced and untreatable cancer, or possibly just benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Would it have any redeeming value for me if I refused to have my health checked out more thoroughly after there was suspicion of disease? Is there value to letting a health problem go untreated and possibly succumb to the disease due to neglect? Should Israel had refused to be released from bondage in Egypt? Should Peter had stayed in prison when God sent his Angel to release him? Staying in a null marriage is like these - it’s like Israel refusing to be released from captivity.
Once the representatives of the Church indicated that your marriage is possibly invalid, and offered their help in making a determination, you cannot claim that you are following God’s will as the Church understands it. You are following what YOU believe is God’s will, and your beliefs are in disagreement with the Church’s teachings.
I think it is really important that you make a decision: do you want to follow the Catholic Church’s teachings, or do you want to follow your own beliefs, when the two contradict each other? Reading your posts, I came to enjoy them, the intellectual and analytical bent of these posts. So, I am trying to challenge you in this sense, but I am certainly motivated by friendly feelings.
I would like to mention a practical matter, too. You found a letter in which that woman calls your wife her soulmate. You have also other grounds to suspect infidelity. This is what I would do in this situation: I would flat out confront my wife, ask her to put an end to her affair, and honor her marriage vows. And if she refused, I wouldn’t stay under one roof with her. Regarding marital intimacy, I wouldn’t try before I was sure my wife ended her affair and she got thoroughly checked for STDs. You don’t know her status at this point, and you don’t want to find it out the hard way.