We’ve all done it (agree with a link or post we didn’t mean to) before, or at least I’ve done it before.Oh yeah, I just saw it. I didn’t know there was a creeping myth thing. Thanks for clarifying it. I didn’t mean to agree to the link.
The fact of state laws passed in a majority of states by state senators, congressman have all attributed to outlawing the creeping of Islamic Shariah law in their respective states.
So long story short you can’t actually find where Congress has passed laws concerning Sharia because Congress hasn’t actually passed any laws concerning Sharia; and therefore you are resorting to citing states that have and are ignoring the fact that these laws have been deemed unconstitutional by the SC are being challenged as such.
Unless one understands what the Islamic sharia law is, which infringes and violates existing constitution human right laws, one would follow their local state representatives and vote to outlaw Islam’s shariah law.
Thank you for proving the other poster’s point.
I respect your opinion that appears to reject the reality. I think I have proven that Congress in their respective states outlawed Sharia law.
If so that’s good to know. But it doesn’t mean no more attempts to change the courts would be made.
Is there something fundamentally different between Muslims wishing to shape society and our legal system to better reflect their values and beliefs and any other group doing the same?
Congress Passing legislation according to the Constitution, which Shariah law violates Constitutional law, introducing a bill and passing a law which is challenged by the Current administration remains to be seen both at the State and Federal levels. These passed laws rejecting Shariah law may not be enforced today due to Muslims contesting them, is all the justice your post have served here.
You have yet to prove anything you have said in this thread. Even when it seems like posters are begging for links to what you are talking about. Please, don’t call me ignorant.
I never called you ignorant, forgive me if you misread my post. If any one who is ignorant of Sharia law, is what my post relates too.
Congress hasn’t actually passed any laws concerning Sharia. States have, but these laws have either been deemed unconstitutional or are currently being challenged as such. I don’t know how much plainer I can state that.
Apparently you did not read the link I provided and failed to follow up the states and their local congressman.
Do you understand the difference between state and federal government and the difference between the federal legislative body (i.e. Congress) and state legislative bodies?
These laws and many more from Shariah law creep in a free society, by the ignorant of Islam who convert to Islam and who many find it too late to leave Islam because of the death law from Shariah.Never mind about religious freedom or whether Congress outlawing Sharia Law or not, as such arguments are senseless when I read more about the Sharia Law. There is no place in this world for Sharia Law to have any jurisdiction.
According to the Sharia law:
• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls’ clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad’s words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband’s consent to divorce.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman’s testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man’s.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be Halal.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
The list goes on. Even as non-Muslims, we will be subjected to the Sharia Law to a certain degree if not fully. For Muslims, they are not subjected to our laws but their own.
I cannot help noticing that among the wars and the persecution of Christians in the Middle East, adding to that the Sharia Law issue in the Western countries…it makes me think that the people fighting for the Sharia Law to take effect are under the influence from the urging of the political parties of the Middle East.
No matter how I try to look at these issues, they always seem bound together like a package. If the Sharia Law is allowed in any country, it will path a way for Islam to enter politics and even dominate the country. The way I see it, the Sharia Law is like dark heavy clouds before a huge storm.
NO to Sharia Law.
Thanks for the clear illustration of Sharia LawNever mind about religious freedom or whether Congress outlawing Sharia Law or not, as such arguments are senseless when I read more about the Sharia Law. There is no place in this world for Sharia Law to have any jurisdiction.
According to the Sharia law:
• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls’ clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad’s words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband’s consent to divorce.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman’s testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man’s.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be Halal.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
The list goes on. Even as non-Muslims, we will be subjected to the Sharia Law to a certain degree if not fully. For Muslims, they are not subjected to our laws but their own.
I cannot help noticing that among the wars and the persecution of Christians in the Middle East, adding to that the Sharia Law issue in the Western countries…it makes me think that the people fighting for the Sharia Law to take effect are under the influence from the urging of the political parties of the Middle East.
No matter how I try to look at these issues, they always seem bound together like a package. If the Sharia Law is allowed in any country, it will path a way for Islam to enter politics and even dominate the country. The way I see it, the Sharia Law is like dark heavy clouds before a huge storm.
NO to Sharia Law.
KendraDZ a good short summary of some of the laws of Sharia by I believe guynextdoor. Lot’s of death and injury happen to those who even mention anything remotely negative about it. The first thing to go is the right of free speech if it get’s a hold of our nation. Then as one poster stated we will be engulfed in a dark, black cloud.
Not really since what constitutes Sharia actually differs between the two main Islamic faiths (Sunni and Shia) as well as within those two faiths themselves. Let us assume that the Westboro church puts forth a list of Christian laws and requirements that Christians need to live by. Would you claim that this Westboro list represents all Christian laws and requirements that Christians need to live by?