S
SeriousQuestion
Guest
I don’t think people should have a right on deciding whether someone wants to live in certain conditions or not.
Last edited:
Sorry, typo. Fourteenth Amendment.It looks like ConstantLerner is focusing on the “secure in their persons”. That has nothing to do with abortions; it concerns searches and seizures by a government entity.
Some people born in the direst of situations have risen to great heights. I don’t think that’s a good argument, and the abortion issue, at any rate, in the US, is a legal issue. It will be settled according to how the SC justices interpret the Constitution and only that, and even that will have to wait till they are presented with an appropriate case.Take a look at some of the situations that the children would be born into, and ask yourselves… would it really be better for the children to be born into that?
Sure, she would.Wouldn’t the mother have similar problems too?
Oh, yes, many babies born to drug addicted moms live normal lives, and doctors can minimize the initial suffering. Others have some lasting problems that need treatment, but I’ve never met a person who said they’d rather have been aborted.Wouldn’t the mother have similar problems too? Long lasting implies that this ends, so there might be hope for them.
The Court made clear that as a basic right to privacy protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the woman’s right is “fundamental,” meaning that governmental attempts to interfere with the right are subject to “strict scrutiny.”I thought that amendment gave people a right to life.
That would be the ideal.My opinion is that abortion should be illegal. My wish is that it didn’t matter because the practice was so universally condemned and outmoded because fathers, mothers, children and families were so valued, honored, and revered by our society that the LAST thing anyone would ever think of when it comes to an unborn baby is killing it.