I find it troublesome that if the child is wanted, it is legally protected and if it is not, it can be murdered.
For example. If a pregnant woman is hit by a drunk driver and she loses her life the driver is charged NOT ONLY with killing her but with killing the child in her womb. In that instance, the child was wanted, so the child had human rights.
BUT if the mother does NOT want the child, she herself can have it killed and there is no legal repercussion.
I get it. Pregnancy is scary, child-rearing is even scarier… but I am a FIRM believer that if you can’t take the heat you stay out of the fire (don’t have sex if you’re not willing to accept the risks).
I understand the argument that the child is reliant on the mother’s body.
I don’t understand why that means all of its rights as a human are void and null.
I was raised on Star Trek. Even the opportunity for sentience should be protected. A baby in its most primitive form possesses it’s own unique DNA. It bears ALL the markers of LIFE. Left alone it becomes a sentient human. We have no right to terminate that life, even if the mother is scared or uncomfortable. Her rights do not trump the rights of other humans even if those humans are inside her.
Caveat: I am a woman. I am pregnant. I still strongly believe abortion should be illegal.