Should Catholic colleges strive to be gay-friendly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnq
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

johnq

Guest
Boston College set to adopt language that welcomes gays

By Jenna Russell, Globe Staff | May 10, 2005

Boston College administrators have agreed to change the school’s statement of nondiscrimination to make it more welcoming to gay students and employees, but the revision stops short of prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

The policy changes were agreed on after weeks of meetings between BC’s general counsel, two high-ranking student affairs officials, and student leaders. Jack Dunn, a spokesman for the Catholic university, said the compromise was drafted last week and is expected to become policy after further internal review.

Three weeks ago, a campus rally in support of gay rights drew 1,000 people. Student activists have lobbied for changes in the nondiscrimination policy for more than three years, since BC appeared on a list of gay-unfriendly colleges published by the Princeton Review. The university’s nondiscrimination statement pledges compliance with laws against discrimination based on race, religion, age, sex, and other protected criteria, but because Massachusetts law includes an exemption for religious institutions with moral objections to homosexuality, the policy doesn’t grant the same blanket protection to sexual orientation.

In new language to be added to the statement, BC ''commits itself to maintaining a welcoming environment for all people and extends its welcome in particular to those who may be vulnerable to discrimination on the basis of their race . . . religion, color, age . . . or sexual orientation."

But the revised policy also makes clear that BC will comply with antidiscrimination laws ''while reserving its lawful rights where appropriate to take actions designed to promote the Jesuit, Catholic principles that sustain its mission and heritage."

University officials have said the exemption allows them to withhold funding or recognition from student groups with goals at odds with Catholic principles, without being vulnerable to lawsuits.

Student leaders said in a joint statement that the new policy is ''vastly improved" and ''noticeably more welcoming and affirming to all communities," but not perfect.

''We are disappointed that the revised clause continues to separate sexual orientation from other groups . . . when the welcoming address . . . so accurately and vividly represents the culture of our University," student government president Grace Simmons and other student leaders wrote. ''The new statement is a milestone, but not an end."

A spokeswoman for the Association of Jesuit Colleges and Universities in Washington, D.C., said 21 of the nation’s 28 Jesuit campuses include the words sexual orientation in their nondiscrimination policies. She could not say how many schools offer full protection. The College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, which chose to forgo the state’s religious exemption, does include sexual preference alongside age, race, and gender.

Dunn acknowledged that some students think the policy still needs work, but he said campus reaction has been overwhelmingly positive. ''Students respect the fact that as a Jesuit university, we have an obligation to uphold our religious convictions," he said.

The Rev. John W. Howard, a BC alumnus and a longtime faculty member, said many students feel they have a long way to go until the policy is truly fair. Many of the most vocal students seem to be motivated by Jesuit teachings about the duty to fight injustice, he said.

''I heard one university official say, this is the price we pay for having bright kids coming to BC," said Howard. ''Like it or not, many of them seem to have gotten the [Jesuit] message. I’m not the only one who admires them."

Student activists scored a victory in 2003, when the university’s president, the Rev. William Leahy, agreed to grant official recognition to a gay-straight student alliance on campus.

''The hard work of the movement, including the rally and discussions, have definitely had an impact on the culture at BC, and students are committed to continue the work," said Michael Yaksich, director of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender issues for BC’s student government.

http://cache.boston.com/bonzai-fba/...nzai-fba/File-Based_Image_Resource/spacer.gif
cache.boston.com/bonzai-fba/File-Based_Image_Resource/from_provider_globe.gif

Jenna Russell can be reached at jrussell@globe.com. http://cache.boston.com/bonzai-fba/File-Based_Image_Resource/dingbat_story_end_icon.gif
 
Hi johng!

I guess it depends on what is meant by “gay-friendly.”
 
…what’s wrong with just being friendly… and i think that is the point here… i hope!
 
Chaste homosexuals have no need to declare themselves as homosexual. If they do it’s part of the agenda to create a special class. No Catholic College should find it necessary to embrace this agenda.
 
Boston College is a Jesuit college and thus it is arguable whether or not it is a Catholic college.
 
What ever happened to being simply “human friendly”?

cheers
 
40.png
quijote:
What ever happened to being simply “human friendly”?

cheers
Not good enough for the pc police–
 
What kind of “screwball” who happens to be in charge would CHANGE A CATHOLIC UNIV. to Welcom Gays.

Either it is IS a Catholic University or it is not.

Why would a University change their statement toward Gays when Gays comprise less than 5% of the Population. What will this do to and for the other 95% plus students.

This is going too far and without a reason.
 
40.png
swampfox:
Boston College is a Jesuit college and thus it is arguable whether or not it is a Catholic college.
I attended a jesuit College although its been 30 years ago. They were left leaning then and more so now. i am reminded of a story Columnist georgie ann Geyer told.

Seems Carter sent an emissary to visit Castro. To breakthe ice the emmissary mentioned that he and castro had something in common-they both were educated by the Jesuits. Catro’s reply was “Yes, but I have remained faithfull to their teacahings!”
 
40.png
Exporter:
What kind of “screwball” who happens to be in charge would CHANGE A CATHOLIC UNIV. to Welcom Gays.

Either it is IS a Catholic University or it is not.

Why would a University change their statement toward Gays when Gays comprise less than 5% of the Population. What will this do to and for the other 95% plus students.

This is going too far and without a reason.

If it’s Catholic, then it won’t ignore CCC 2358 🙂 - unlike those Cafeteria Catholics who routinely do precisely that. The teaching of the Church in that paragraph is perfectly clear, and only those with their own agenda will complain.​

After all, the Church is not a democracy 🙂 ##
 
Yep next thing we’ll see is some other wierd behavior welcomed. Let’s see the college welcomes perverts of all kinds, long as you don’t break any laws we’re fine with dominance, S&M, auto erotic asphyxiation…whatever you want to do we want to encourage you to do it at OUR college!

WHY is this homosexual behavior to be encouraged? Why do we even want to know?
Lisa N
 
Hi guys!

I am confused, so perhaps one of you could help me out. If we are to be upset over the fact that Boston College has extended a welcome to those who might suffer from same-sex attraction, should we assume that, by extension, Christ does not welcome them into the Church?
 
Other Eric:
Hi guys!

I am confused, so perhaps one of you could help me out. If we are to be upset over the fact that Boston College has extended a welcome to those who might suffer from same-sex attraction, should we assume that, by extension, Christ does not welcome them into the Church?
Not at all. It’s not the condition it’s the action (sin). Christ welcomes all sinners. He also commands that they follow his ways. “Welcoming” (embracing) SSA and “gay” lifetstyles creates a special class of people for reasons that are disordered. A chaste homosexual has no need to declare his condition, and they have exactly the same rights now as every other citizen. If they declare themselves it is part of an agenda that is being stuffed down our throats in the name of political correctness.
 
Other Eric:
Hi guys!

I am confused, so perhaps one of you could help me out. If we are to be upset over the fact that Boston College has extended a welcome to those who might suffer from same-sex attraction, should we assume that, by extension, Christ does not welcome them into the Church?
Everyone is a sinner. Christ welcomes sinners. He asks them to repent of the sin, whether it be lying, cheating, stealing, sex outside of marriage (including homosexual sex), etc. There is a distinct difference between welcoming the person, whether it be by the Church or a college, and redefining sin.
 
A chaste homosexual has no need to declare his condition, and they have exactly the same rights now as every other citizen.
there is no such thing as sexual orientation. people are not defined by their sexual perversion. God wills all of us to be saints. homosexual desires are inherently evil.

the church has fallen into this error of legitimizing homosexuality. the truth is we are all called to holiness, including homosexuals. homosexual desire is opposed to our call to holiness.
 
Homosexual ‘desires’ are NOT evil.

These are called ‘temptations’.

Only when we ACT on temptations or evil desires, do we sin.
 
40.png
buffalo:
Not at all. It’s not the condition it’s the action (sin). Christ welcomes all sinners. He also commands that they follow his ways. “Welcoming” (embracing) SSA and “gay” lifetstyles creates a special class of people for reasons that are disordered. A chaste homosexual has no need to declare his condition, and they have exactly the same rights now as every other citizen. If they declare themselves it is part of an agenda that is being stuffed down our throats in the name of political correctness.
Hi buffalo!

The way I read the new language, the college is extending its welcome to the person who suffers from same-sex attraction, not the orientation itself. That they have reserved the right to take action “where appropriate . . .to promote [their] Jesuit, Catholic principles” reinforces this distinction.

I am not sure I agree that, in every case, if someone is known to suffer from same-sex attraction that it is always a disclosure made to undermine the Catholic faith. Certainly David Morrison would be surprised. He has disclosed his same-sex attraction in a very public way. He has also spoken at Boston College to promote chastity. Should his welcome similarly have been rescinded?
 
Other Eric:
Hi buffalo!

The way I read the new language, the college is extending its welcome to the person who suffers from same-sex attraction, not the orientation itself. That they have reserved the right to take action “where appropriate . . .to promote [their] Jesuit, Catholic principles” reinforces this distinction.

I am not sure I agree that, in every case, if someone is known to suffer from same-sex attraction that it is always a disclosure made to undermine the Catholic faith. Certainly David Morrison would be surprised. He has disclosed his same-sex attraction in a very public way. He has also spoken at Boston College to promote chastity. Should his welcome similarly have been rescinded?
I still maintain there is no need to make a special welcome to any group like this. This is a slippery slope - next will be Satanists? Cross Dressers? NAMBLA? Alcoholics, Druggies - where does it stop?
 
Catholic colleges should strive to do the same as all Catholics. Love God above all things and Love your neighbor as your self. We have to Love the sinner and hate the sin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top