Sigh. Perhaps it hasn’t occurred to some of you that Jesus associated with, ate dinners with, and generally hung out with thieves, prostitutes, and sinners – because he truly
liked them, and
loved them, generously and convivially.
That doesn’t mean condoning anything, but if you believe you are to be judged before the most high, which of these failings would you rather plead to? ‘I didn’t express my joyful love of my fellow humans, and my children enough’ or ‘I didn’t rebuke and condemn others enough’ ?
If you answer the latter, and truly think it more acceptable to your Lord, then I am more sorrowful then I can say. Life is so short, and I would have thought that those who claim to be followers of the Moralist of Galilee would be particularly aware of that.
‘A
little research’ is right! Like Mormons? Hahaha - WHAT? Way, way off. The SoF are often referred to as the Quakers (you know, like the guy on the oatmeal box

). Like many of the founding fathers of the USA, they were and are Deists, with strong views about the freedom, dignity and equality of all humankind, the importance of education. William Penn was a Quaker, and the colony of Pennsylvania was founded as a haven for the Friends, like Maryland was for Catholics, and indeed the two states had close ties.
Tsk, look this stuff up yourself. I don’t know where you did your ‘research’ but I suggest if your source also says the sky is blue, check your window just in case…
By the way, neither Mirdath nor I are either Protestant or Catholic. But were we to become Christians, we would most likely want to be Quakers.
As for the rest of your fallacious nonsense, we have addressed the ethical issues of consent with other posters here, ad nauseam, in other threads. Maybe we’ll get back to you after breakfast, but really I’d rather go for a walk on the beach right now!