Should Catholics be concerned about animals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marfran
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
So, if my opinion differs from that of the film that I am not a Christian?
No Drawmack!! This is what Christians are discussing. This is what clergy is discussing. You should view the film and see if it resonates with you, or not. That’s why we are here, why we exchange our thoughts, ideas, and feelings on these threads.
 
Ridgerunner;5524937:
Ridgerunner
: I just have to say this: You and I have been in many of the same threads. Obviously I don’t eat meat, obviously you produce it. But I have to say, despite our differences, I really appreciate your honesty and the truths that you bring to the discussions. I do get frustrated with people who spout off opinions based on air–who refuse to learn about how our food is produced, who refuse to learn about nutrition yet are very opinionated about it, who subscribe to myths rather than actively learning the realities… You have proven yourself in these threads to be a sincere contributor, your honesty shines through your words. I really do appreciate your (name removed by moderator)ut. If there is any way you can see that documentary film Food Inc., I wish you would. I would really like your opinion/perspective on the piece.

Peace,

It was very kind of you to say these things. If the film comes around here, I will try to see it. However, given the kind of area I live in, and the familiarity so many people here have with farming and the food industries, I would question whether any of the theater owners would bother to run it.

Let me say again, that I have no problem with people who want to be vegetarians or vegans. That’s their choice, for whatever reasons they have. My only comment about it is that it is my impression that people who don’t know anything about nutrition shouldn’t just jump in and do it without really studying it, particularly if they give their children the same diet.

I do not want to create the impression that I approve, carte blanche, of all food industries. I don’t. I was particularly appalled, for example, by what I saw in a factory that processes spices from overseas (where most of them come from). As a consequence of that, my wife and I became very particular about the spices we buy and use.

But let me also add this “philosophical” note. I am of European descent. It’s just a fact that Indo-Europeans lived out on the Eurasian plains for tens of thousands of years, and were herders. It is to me then, no coincidence that Indo-Europeans are relatively tolerant to bovine lactose, whereas most of the other people in the world are not. It is also true that there are animal vector diseases of man, including cattle vector diseases. To some of the latter, Europeans are relatively immune or tolerant compared to some others of the world’s people. Quite likely, on the other hand, peoples of other origins have acquired tolerances and immunities to animal vector diseases which Europeans do not have.

Interestingly, the study in Germany examined the relative tolerance to the resistant varieties of e coli-the ones that cause the trouble for people. It disclosed that people who were raised on farms where there were cattle were relatively immune to the “killer e coli” varieties. The reason, the study concluded, was that children who played in cattle yards caught various varieties early in life and suffered little from it, and that the later in life one is exposed, the more serious it is. I used the comparison with polio, which is endemic in the third world, but was not the crippler that it was in the first world. The reason being that in the third world, where sanitation is bad, children actually contract polio very young when, for various reasons, full recovery is more likely. This will strike you as silly, perhaps, but I have made certain that my children and grandchildren have had ample opportunity to be exposed to cattle and cattle manure. Hopefully, then, if they eat a “bad burger” as adults, they will have acquired relative immunity. It may well be, then, that it is not so much the “filthiness” of meat production, but the sanitation of our urban and suburban lives that cause us to be susceptible to things we would have shrugged off as herders on the Eurasian plains or as ranchers on the American grasslands.

It is interesting, then, for me to speculate that we might have “bought our birthright” to survive certain animal vector diseases; further, that some of us may have a natural symbiosis with cattle; a symbiosis which our increasing isolation from animals can cause us to lose. As with lactose tolerance, there may be other adaptations our bodies have made over the millenia that could be helpful to us. Strange as it may seem to some, meat-eating might actually be better for Indo-Europeans than being vegetarians, for reasons we don’t even know, but which have been acquired over an immense period of time. Perhaps I am a fool, but I do feel as if my cattle and I do live in symbiosis, but a symbiosis that, on an individual basis, ends sooner than the maximum imaginable extent of their natural lives. And my cattle feed nutritious protein to many, many people, protein made from grass that is otherwise as useless to human nutrition as stones. I know a vegan won’t accept this, but I feel as if God made those animals for me and me for them. I do owe them decent treatment, and I know that.

I can’t address the contention that grain causes certain varieties of e coli to proliferate in a bovine digestive tract. Their digestive tracts certainly do change over time, and more than once. (Colostrum to milk, milk to grass, grass to grain if they’re fed grain) Others occur as well. This grass to that grass, grass to legumes, grass to grain, grain to grain, even grass to acorns…once a year I turn them into the woods for that, and they thrive on them) Certain “natural” foods, (e.g., heavily seeding grasses and legumes) are not dissimilar from grain, and you can see changes in digestion and weight gain.

I can appreciate a well-marbled steak as much as the next guy, but I do prefer grass-fed. Others would debate this, but my preference is for grass fed young bulls. Awfully lean, but in my mind, the most flavorful of all. Cattle have roughly the same number of male and female offspring. Yet, one dominant bull will be the sole breeder of around thirty cows, and will drive others away; perhaps injuring or killing them in the process.

Perhaps it’s my rationalization, but I think it’s just as well for a young bull to end its life feeding people than it is for him to die of peritonitis from being gored.
 
No Drawmack!! This is what Christians are discussing. This is what clergy is discussing. You should view the film and see if it resonates with you, or not. That’s why we are here, why we exchange our thoughts, ideas, and feelings on these threads.
Then do not tell me that the film is “the Christian perspective” unless it is the Christian perspective. It is a Christian perspective. And, you have the audacity wonder why people get defensive.

I did view the film. I do not agree with what they are saying. I believe that they are using footage from the worst of the worst facilities and then editing that footage to make it look even worse. In other words, I think that this film is propaganda. As for Food Inc, I’m not going to spend my money to see it.
 
Michaelo: Thanks for the E coli stats:

**Incidence (annual) of Escherichia coli O157:H7: estimated 73,000 annual cases of infection in USA (DBMD)
Incidence Rate: approx 1 in 3,726 or 0.03% or 73,000 people in USA [about data]
Prevalance of Escherichia coli O157:H7: An estimated 73,000 cases of infection and 61 deaths occur in the United States each year.1 … An estimated 73,000 cases occur annually in the United States. Uncommonly reported in patients in less industrialized countries. 2 **

Well, that doesn’t seem so bad. Only **73,000 **people in the US get sick every year from eating E coli tainted food. And only 61 people die. Seems reasonable. For the pleasure of eating meat only 61 people per year have to die. What year are the stats from? We’ve had a lot of outbreaks this year. I would think we’ll lose a few more than 61 this year.

Where are the people who say that we are designed to eat meat?? Why are we cooking the life out of it to kill the E coli anyway??? Well I suppose that if we didn’t cook it, and ate it raw like the animals in nature do, the animals that are designed to eat it–we’d lose a few more than 61 people. I don’t mean to make light of the 73,000 who get sick and don’t die. I wonder if they all fully recover or are there permanent effects to having had this illness?

In the film Food Inc. a little boy dies from eating a hamburger. It takes 16 days after his death before the lot of meat that killed him is recalled. His mother is understandibly distraught at losing her son. This is the origin of ***Kevin’s Law. ***

cspinet.org/foodsafety/kevinslawbrochure.pdf

I was just looking at the brochure on Kevin’s Law. In 1993 only 4 children died from E coli food borne illness. I guess the numbers are going up.

Are we*** eating mercifully ***if people, if children are dying from the food?
It must be remembered that people have gotten sick and have died from e coli gotten from vegetables, too. Doubtless those are different varieties of the bug. A physician told me that most of our own feces are composed of e coli bacteria, (80% I think he said) and certain varieties of e coli endemic to humans in one place may well cause problems for people in another place. My wife scrubs our vegetables VERY well, particularly those from south of the border. My resistance to, e.g., the human e coli prevalent in Jalisco, would be pretty doubtful. And, of course, since you can buy antibiotics over the counter there and self-treat with methicillin or anything else, there are doubtless some very resistant strains around.

One of the oddities of food production is that, in meat processing plants, they have “bathroom monitors” whose sole job it is to sit by the bathroom door. People emerging from the bathroom must open the door after they heed the call of nature, and wash their hands in front of the “potty monitor”, to make sure they do it, and do it thoroughly, with anti-bacterial soap. Human e coli is the reason they do that.

Unfortunately, in last year’s vegetable e coli outbreaks, one doubts there were “potty monitors” in the fields where the vegetables were picked.

Finally, it ought to be noted that some people are much more susceptible to e coli infection than are others, just as they are to other bugs.
 
In any case, we’re beginning to stray from the topic, the concern about animals.
True, I will stop straying.
There are improvements that should be made, no doubt. But for purposes of this discussion, I don’t think feeding cattle corn is necessarily bad for them, as evidenced by their ability to convert it into a food source for mankind.
IMO grass-fed is the way to go 👍

Marfran

Perhaps I didn’t search thoroughly enough, but I couldn’t find too much more updated information about E. coli cases.
 
The way humanity treats the environment influences the way it treats itself, and vice versa. This invites contemporary society to a serious review of its lifestyle, which, in many parts of the world, is prone to hedonism and consumerism, regardless of their harmful consequences. What is needed is an effective shift in mentality which can lead to the adoption of new lifestyles "in which the quest for truth, beauty, goodness, and communion with others for the sake of common growth are the factors which determine consumer choices, savings, and investments. Every violation of solidarity and civic friendship harms the environment, just as environmental deterioration in turn upsets relations in society (emphasis in original) (51).

thedivinemercy.org/news/story.php?NID=3683&PLID=71
 
It is more than likely either the cause of inorganic farming methods or community streams.

The e.coli comes from the manure being used as fertilizer. The fertilizer gets washed off but the bacteria remains. Some of the e.coli comes from water which is shared with factory farms. In every instance of vegetables being tainted with e.coli or salmonella there is more than likely an animal or bird facility near by. It doesn’t take much to transfer the bacteria, either. A gust of wind could feasibly carry it as could a fly. But, as I said, it more than likely comes from inorganic farming.
 
Then do not tell me that the film is “the Christian perspective” unless it is the Christian perspective. It is a Christian perspective. And, you have the audacity wonder why people get defensive.

I did view the film. I do not agree with what they are saying. I believe that they are using footage from the worst of the worst facilities and then editing that footage to make it look even worse. In other words, I think that this film is propaganda. As for Food Inc, I’m not going to spend my money to see it.
My thoughts, too.Food, Inc. is a PETA produced film, if I remember correctly.Both in my humble opinion, propaganda.And you can see it for free on the internet.(I have watched both.)
You could visit nursing homes or hospitals & find abuses, too, & paint the whole industry with the same brush.
Good to know about abuses, but not a true portrayal of farming on the whole.
 
It is more than likely either the cause of inorganic farming methods or community streams.

The e.coli comes from the manure being used as fertilizer. The fertilizer gets washed off but the bacteria remains. Some of the e.coli comes from water which is shared with factory farms. In every instance of vegetables being tainted with e.coli or salmonella there is more than likely an animal or bird facility near by. It doesn’t take much to transfer the bacteria, either. A gust of wind could feasibly carry it as could a fly. But, as I said, it more than likely comes from inorganic farming.
My understanding was that last year’s outbreak was due to human sewage flowing into an irrigation ditch; a decidedly unattractive prospect. But I guess that was an “organic” source, and probably made the vegetables grow better. They just made people sick is all.
:rolleyes:

Does anybody really, really think they aren’t exposed to e coli daily? Our own intestines are full of it, and we would die without it. It’s not too good to ingest, though, and the human varieties are no exception to that. I would personally worry a lot more about resistant bacterias from people taking excessive antibiotics and not washing their hands sufficiently after going to the toilet than I would about animal manure. And I am concerned about that. And people sure should be who eat vegetables or fruit from foreign countries or picked by people who buy antibiotics over the counter in Mexico. Is that why MRSA is so prevalent now? Could be.

Actually, not much land is fertilized with manure, which is a shame, really. Chemical fertilizers have problems all their own. My cattle do their duty in my fields, and they are fairly profuse about it over time. I have a stream running through that I test every now and then. Zip e coli. Zip coliform. I test the wells too, with the same result. There are two poultry farms about a quarter to a half mile away, and have been for years. The Dept of Natural Resources is pretty demanding about what they can do with the chicken litter.
 
My understanding was that last year’s outbreak was due to human sewage flowing into an irrigation ditch; a decidedly unattractive prospect. But I guess that was an “organic” source, and probably made the vegetables grow better. They just made people sick is all.
:rolleyes:
Well, feces or manure which comes from a meat eating diet is not considered organic.
Does anybody really, really think they aren’t exposed to e coli daily? Our own intestines are full of it, and we would die without it. It’s not too good to ingest, though, and the human varieties are no exception to that. I would personally worry a lot more about resistant bacterias from people taking excessive antibiotics and not washing their hands sufficiently after going to the toilet than I would about animal manure. And I am concerned about that. And people sure should be who eat vegetables or fruit from foreign countries or picked by people who buy antibiotics over the counter in Mexico. Is that why MRSA is so prevalent now? Could be.
Actually, not much land is fertilized with manure, which is a shame, really. Chemical fertilizers have problems all their own. My cattle do their duty in my fields, and they are fairly profuse about it over time. I have a stream running through that I test every now and then. Zip e coli. Zip coliform. I test the wells too, with the same result. There are two poultry farms about a quarter to a half mile away, and have been for years. The Dept of Natural Resources is pretty demanding about what they can do with the chicken litter.
The only real suggestion I can make for persons who are concerned about this is to buy as LOCAL as you can, or raise your own, if possible.

I also think that private institutes should be created to do the inspecting. Each one answerable to it’s own county or state. Free enterprise/capitalism will see that the food processing facilities will be inspected thoroughly as the jobs and reputations of the inspectors would be on the line. Whereas, a government employee who is lackadaisical is almost impossible to fire unless they commit a crime. The food trail would be easier to trace, and possibly the threat of tainted food could be detected earlier before it reaches the consumer.
 
My thoughts, too.Food, Inc. is a PETA produced film, if I remember correctly.Both in my humble opinion, propaganda.And you can see it for free on the internet.(I have watched both.)
You could visit nursing homes or hospitals & find abuses, too, & paint the whole industry with the same brush.
Good to know about abuses, but not a true portrayal of farming on the whole.
This is a Robert Kenner Participant Media film.
robertkennerfilms.com/films/files/detail_current.php
 
The way humanity treats the environment influences the way it treats itself, and vice versa. This invites contemporary society to a serious review of its lifestyle, which, in many parts of the world, is prone to hedonism and consumerism, regardless of their harmful consequences. What is needed is an effective shift in mentality which can lead to the adoption of new lifestyles "in which the quest for truth, beauty, goodness, and communion with others for the sake of common growth are the factors which determine consumer choices, savings, and investments. Every violation of solidarity and civic friendship harms the environment, just as environmental deterioration in turn upsets relations in society (emphasis in original) (51).

thedivinemercy.org/news/story.php?NID=3683&PLID=71
This is a great resource!! Thanks Bill!!!
 
Marfran;5525095:
I can appreciate a well-marbled steak as much as the next guy, but I do prefer grass-fed. Others would debate this, but my preference is for grass fed young bulls. Awfully lean, but in my mind, the most flavorful of all.
Ridgerunner: I take it that you grass feed your cattle. And that’s what cattle ***are ***designed to eat. The problem is when cattle are fed corn. Here’s a trailer from the film Food, Inc. The film goes into much more depth than the trailer, but here’s the gist of it.

This is a Robert Kenner Participant Media film.
robertkennerfilms.com/films/f…il_current.php
 
This is a great resource!! Thanks Bill!!!
No problem. I mean if we are supposed to be Catholics then we should understand what the church teaches. Even if it makes people a little uncomfortable. The Rush Limbaugh fans won’t be able to stand it. But, you know, Jesus created quite a stir in his day,… and we are supposed to be just like him…😛 (If only I could pull THAT off…)

Anyway, The Pope is pretty adamant about animal welfare. Of course I wish he were an abolitionist…But, He’s probably willing to allow it to sink in slowly. After all, you can’t teach an old dog new tricks.
 
Thank you for your disingenous post .

This is a Robert Kenner Participant Media film.
robertkennerfilms.com/films/files/detail_current.php
You are welcome.Not sure exactly what “disingenous” means,(my best undereducated guess is it might be a ten dollar word for dishonest), but it was an incorrect post. I apologize.You are right about Food, Inc." I was thinking about the Meat film from PETA.
I’ll need to watch the Food, Inc to be able to discuss it “ingenously.”:)Just a quick glance wasn’t real appealing though-looks quite political.
Why do social justice posts end up being political?:confused:
 
Waaaaayyyy off topic… But, another really good movie people should watch is “the Gods must be Crazy”. It isn’t about animals but it does make a good social commentary on what modern society values…😊
But, to get back on subject.
St Francis cared about animals.Samuel had a favorite lamb that he killed some guy over… Jesus was the Lamb of God. Of course we should care about animals. Humans may have been born under original sin, but that doesn’t imply we were born to be mean… (although I do have to wonder sometimes…)
 
You are welcome.Not sure exactly what “disingenous” means,(my best undereducated guess is it might be a ten dollar word for dishonest), but it was an incorrect post. I apologize.You are right about Food, Inc." I was thinking about the Meat film from PETA.
I’ll need to watch the Food, Inc to be able to discuss it “ingenously.”:)Just a quick glance wasn’t real appealing though-looks quite political.
Why do social justice posts end up being political?:confused:
Your postings are disingenous, please refrain from posting here. You were asked to refrain at the beginning of this thread, I am surprised that the request must be repeated.
 
Waaaaayyyy off topic… But, another really good movie people should watch is “the Gods must be Crazy”. It isn’t about animals but it does make a good social commentary on what modern society values…😊
But, to get back on subject.
St Francis cared about animals.Samuel had a favorite lamb that he killed some guy over… Jesus was the Lamb of God. Of course we should care about animals. Humans may have been born under original sin, but that doesn’t imply we were born to be mean… (although I do have to wonder sometimes…)
Welcome to the thread Bill! St.Francis is my fav! I wish he were here to steer our ship! Oh, I guess we’ll have to manage on our own!
 
Your postings are disingenous, please refrain from posting here. You were asked to refrain at the beginning of this thread, I am surprised that the request must be repeated.
disingenuous?
  1. Not straightforward or candid; insincere or calculating:
  2. Pretending to be unaware or unsophisticated; faux-naïf.
  3. Usage Problem Unaware or uninformed; naive.
Sister Mary Francis… I am surprised at you…:tsktsk:
 
No problem. I mean if we are supposed to be Catholics then we should understand what the church teaches. Even if it makes people a little uncomfortable. The Rush Limbaugh fans won’t be able to stand it. But, you know, Jesus created quite a stir in his day,… and we are supposed to be just like him…😛 (If only I could pull THAT off…)

Anyway, The Pope is pretty adamant about animal welfare. Of course I wish he were an abolitionist…But, He’s probably willing to allow it to sink in slowly. After all, you can’t teach an old dog new tricks.
Yes, this topic does make people uncomfortable. But that’s why we’re here to hash things out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top