P
Pup7
Guest
The Doctor is “Real In”.Pup7:![]()
The older I get, the funnier Lucy’s sign “Psychiatric Care 5cents” seems.They don’t understand the satire in Charlie Brown, whose characters actually mirror much of modern existence
The Doctor is “Real In”.Pup7:![]()
The older I get, the funnier Lucy’s sign “Psychiatric Care 5cents” seems.They don’t understand the satire in Charlie Brown, whose characters actually mirror much of modern existence
But you originally claimed that they “subtly promote…the occult.”I don’t know the producers
I’m not really sure what the difference is.Tolkien did I borrow from pagan stories. But that has really nothing to do with a visual work that uses occult symbols as occult symbols.
Sort of old movie, but there is The Hunchback of Notre Dame.Is there a Disney show that features a bunch of Christian symbols? If there was how would you interpret that?
Fair enough. But they put these symbols there for a reason. What is the reason? It isn’t redeeming them.But you originally claimed that they “subtly promote…the occult.”
That is the point. They ultimately had a Christian message. We know what those authors intended. We don’t know what the people who slip occult/Masonic symbols into so much of our media intend. But we can take a good guess.I’m not really sure what the difference is.
Tolkien and Lewis took oral and written stories based on pagan mythology and used some of their creatures and myths in their own written stories. While their stories may have ultimately held Christian messages, it’s not like the elves or centaurs were some overtly Christianized version of the originals.
And that’s it then, right? But those symbols are essential to the story. You aren’t going to see a cross or anything else Christian in Frozen.Sort of old movie, but there is The Hunchback of Notre Dame.
It’s not. Urban legend. Rack it up there with Walt being cryogenically preserved (also false).I had no idea that disney was associated with the occult until I watched those youtube videos claiming it was
And there are a lot of reasons why someone may use something like the Eye of Providence that don’t come down to support of Freemasonry. From an artistic standpoint, they can say a lot about the character, organization, or situation since a lot of these symbols are essentially easy ways of saying, “This is going to cause trouble for the hero eventually.”We don’t know what the people who slip occult/Masonic symbols into so much of our media intend. But we can take a good guess.
To be fair, all you have is Gravity Falls so far.And that’s it then, right?
So you mean like Gravity Falls making reference to one of the most popular of conspiracy theories?But those symbols are essential to the story.
I don’t see it as the worst possible scenario. There are a lot of people, especially in Hollywood, who are into occultism. I don’t think it is cynical to be very wary of what they produce. I mean the rampant homosexuality in almost all their adult productions is to me evidence enough to the danger.Personally, I don’t really see a point in automatically reaching for the worst possible scenario. Such cynicism is probably not healthy, physically or spiritually.
Fair enough. There are some other things I could point out about Disney. The bottom line is I know I can’t trust their productions to be safe for children.To be fair, all you have is Gravity Falls so far.